Sentences with phrase «so goal number»

So goal number one is to be better at promoting myself.

About this blog About my company, Brazen Careerist Penelopes guide to starting a blog Befriend the intern to fire up your career Posted to: Networking Promoting Yourself July 30th, 2010 Del.icio.us So goal number one is to be better at promoting myself.

:) So goal number one is def awesome.

Not exact matches

So maybe your goal is to be the number one residential solar - panel installer in California.

«While our goal is to preserve hashtags on the platform, the safety of our community is our number one priority, so we will take steps to limit the spread of violating content and hashtags that are being abused by making them unsearchable.»

Our budgets are now based on actual numbers, not just percentages, so the team can track progress toward our financial goals.

«Make sure you identify clear and realistic brand and business goals for your site so that you have numbers to optimize against after you go live,» he says.

Their goal was to make marginally more correct decisions than their competitors, in the long haul, and to do so they implemented an analytically rigorous system that not only processed all of the bleeding edge metrics they could find or create, but also heavily incorporated data from old fashioned sources: scouts, who could see things about a player's potential and character that numbers couldn't.

As I've said a number of times before, my goal with The Cannabist — distilled into one sentence — was to create something that avoided the blind activism of High Times and completely ditched the prohibitionist Drug War narratives that had been reported so many times before in mainstream media outlets.

We of course are striving for much higher returns, and so we must be opportunistic and search for extreme value, with the number one goal (and number two goal) of always protecting against permanent loss of capital.

The goal should be that of interpreting the church's program so that the maximum number will know about it, understand it, and be attracted to support it.

I made it my number one goal to make classic dessert recipes for this blog, and so far I have been successful!

but Giroud has a good number of goals already so i love him..

Ozil is not and has never been a n. 10, i don't kniw how this myth started at Madrid he was mainly on the wing, for Germany the same.No.10's score alot of goals Ozil doesn't, so theres no way he's a number 10.

So, my second suggestion, Mr Wenger, is put him in the back five, «cause Ozil is clearly working on his handling skills (as illustrated by the lead up to our third goal) to become our new number one between the sticks (although, he will always be my number one — hope the wife doesn't read this!)

If Arsenal were to lose, it would kill all hopes of a top - four finish, so I believe the approach should be to sit back, defend with numbers, absorb pressure and try and snatch a goal or two when the opportunity presents itself.

Still, the numbers weigh heavily in Chelsea's favour so far, with the Blues getting the best value for money in terms of money paid per goal contribution.

This article, although informative, forgot to mention the number of premier league goals Arsenal have currently scored so we can work out the probability of how long it could possibly take to reach 1000 goals.

He came so close on a number of occasions to both scoring and supplying a goal that would have proved the winner, but couldn't quite get the better of Fraser Forster.

There are so many issues that the memory fades from many of them, however I always thought the Suarez debarcle was one of the worst, Regardless of if Suarez was an «Arsenal Player» or not noone can doubt that he would have scores all of the goals that welbeck, Walcott and Giroud have missed and scored a number on top of that had he played for the AFC, the problem came with the desultory bid of $ 6 million plus a pound, this was always going to get right up the liverpool owners nose and was an insult from the offset in my mind this was done deliberately by Wenger and the board in order to say to the AFC fans that «well we tried to get him but....»

I'm amazed that people are so high on a player who has scored the exact same number of goals as DSP and Chiasson over the last four months.

Yeah we should put a number 10 there so we can have no risk takers, no runs and no goals.

We have G - rude, Walchart & Wellback and a goal scoring Sanchez (LW) so AW will not be buying any new striker over the summer unless Theo leaves as AW and quiet a number on here believe our «strike force» have what it takes to take us to the TOP.: -LRB-

Surprisingly Chambers as the youngest of them but is the most composed of all — regardless getting so much stick from his previous performance — The number of individual error that leads to goal is alarmingly high.

That would already have been broken by our number 11 weeks ago if the likes of Olivier Giroud, Theo Walcott and Alexis Sanchez had not been so profligate in front of goal.

«We have conceded a number of penalties in games where the penalty was the only goal [we conceded], so sometimes you have these runs which are a bit unlucky against you but you would like to do something extra and find one extra save.

The 24 - year - old has a superb record of 14 goals in 15 games in all competitions so far this season, showing why a growing number of elite clubs are being linked with him.

So, our actual source of goal was Giroud who didn't even start the season well... And we have a number 10 that is not exactly known for his goalscoring just the one dimensional style of creating chances...

Our club certainly need to bring in numbers, and our defence has been disastrous so far this term, conceding eight goals in only three Premier League matches already,

I have been more impressed with Santi Cazorla, than with a Ozil, why so, i have said it many times if a player operates in the number 10 slot his goal tally must be in the teens and not single digits.

I realise this is a crude numerical perspective and the figures can be misconstrued but my instincts are to conclude that a decline in performance this season is down to our away performances and the most bleedin obvious explanation for this is the decline in our inability to score goals away from home — with the exception of the 5 away games played so far this year — where we see it is the number of goals conceded away from home that is the main problem.

The 25 - year - old has scored four goals and provided two assists in 16 appearances for Palace so far this season, but beyond the numbers, he is a focal point in Roy Hodgson's plans moving forward.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Understandably so, Hull have conceded 11 goals, while scoring the same number of goals at the other end.

people are going on about the number of goals he scored or lack of them more precisely but morata for the majority of the season was used as an impact player / sub, also like the writer mentioned as both RM&JUVE he was overshadowed by great players / stars so if if he were to sign for us knowing that he is the 1st choice striker he could flourish and surprise us all!!

He got like 20 odd goals for barca so id say hes a bit more than a number 10.

pretty please, its true stats don't lie but it could be manipulated to tell different stories, the simple fact and bottoml line is Ozil created over 190 chances and ONLY 19 was put away by our misfiring duo of Giroud and Walcott, and the fact he had half of the season to match and eclipse the assist record and failed says more about Giroud's and Walcott woeful woeful finishing abilities and nought whatsoever to do with Ozil, am can only do so much, what's next, blame him for number of goals we conceded?

But Arsene will see our possession stats, along with accurate passes and the number of efforts on goal, and think we are doing ok so it must be something that's out of our control.

For another thing, the excellent form of the forward this season, with 17 goals so far, has attracted interest from a number of big clubs.

My issue is what will happen to Aubameyang's goals to game ratio if he signs?Lacazette had very good numbers in France but you wouldn't think so now.Maybe we need something different like a COACH

Czech Republic: Goal Keeper Petr Cech is the Czech Republic's number one and so will definitely be featuring at this year's tournament.

He is so proud, he has spoilt a number of chances and goals due to that, such ATTITUDE hinders development

Whilst I'm therefore pleased that he seems to be progressing well, because the ultimate goal of Wilshere's loan move is to improve his fitness and so he can get regular playing time, you can not tell me that a club of Arsenal's size, didn't think of perhaps reducing the number of hours he does on the training pitch?

Where is the sense in making our second best of not best keeper go on loan, ospina a backup to cech is spoil wrong, the number of goals we have conceded with ospina in between the sticks is alarming, and still wenger allows him to stay and sends out Martinez, how can anyone think ospina is better than Martinez, only someone daft would think so.........

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

It's not slight tho, he's got like a dozen more goals than him, we're breaking r down by minute in re first place because that's to morata benefit to do so, because just pure numbers he's far worse, it's close when you do it by min but lukaku is still better...

The 24 - year - old has seven goals and four assists for his club so far this term, and is another player being watched by a number of Premier League sides at the moment.

The 29 - year - old has scored seven goals and provided six assists in 28 appearances so far this season, and beyond the numbers, all three rumoured targets would offer something else key to Mourinho, which is work ethic.

The goal production rates of Giroud and Costa were actually very close (goals + assists per minutes played)-- Costa was not injured and played more minutes so he produced more in total numbers.

But his league goal scoring numbers for the other 13 seasons of his career goes like this; 0, 9, 6, 5, 5, 11, 7, 11, 9, 18, 26, 12, 8 (so far 2014 - 15) Hmmmmm.