Sentences with phrase «so if your subject»

The V30 doesn't have an editing app to put your movie together, and the zoom mode isn't dynamic, so if your subject moves you end up zooming in on nothing.

Not exact matches

But you also may be subject to the new regulations if you have a large number of so - called full - time equivalent employees.

Now, entrepreneurs are subject to a tax break on the income their businesses generate, but many of them face a key decision: Is it now time to incorporate — and if so, what entity should you choose?

If our device could be moved close to where it is needed, but still on the energy producer's side of that equation, yet just outside the meter, then the energy producers could have millions of these small devices that they own and operate, because grandma doesn't want to become her own utility company because she has a solar panel, but if the utility companies and energy providers could compete with each other to have small units that are so close to the loads, they still get the full advantage of being a supplier of energy, except with just millions of little plants, they can avoid needing transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, et cetera, that everybody is talking about being expensive, unreliable, and subject to issueIf our device could be moved close to where it is needed, but still on the energy producer's side of that equation, yet just outside the meter, then the energy producers could have millions of these small devices that they own and operate, because grandma doesn't want to become her own utility company because she has a solar panel, but if the utility companies and energy providers could compete with each other to have small units that are so close to the loads, they still get the full advantage of being a supplier of energy, except with just millions of little plants, they can avoid needing transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, et cetera, that everybody is talking about being expensive, unreliable, and subject to issueif the utility companies and energy providers could compete with each other to have small units that are so close to the loads, they still get the full advantage of being a supplier of energy, except with just millions of little plants, they can avoid needing transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, et cetera, that everybody is talking about being expensive, unreliable, and subject to issues.

My work on blogs like iAcquire has been an enormous part of establishing myself as both a credible subject matter expert and a talented writer (if I can say so myself).

So often times subjects are edited by anyone online but, if the subject is contentious, an `

So often times subjects are edited by anyone online but, if the subject is contentious, an «editing war» can erupt.

Even so, it's important to remember that such withdrawals may be taxable and, if made prior to age 59 1/2, may be subject to a 10 % penalty tax.

«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»

P.S. I'd love your help naming our new podcast / vlog... If you have a great name please send it to [email protected] with the Subject Line of Name For Your Podcast / Vlog so my team knows what the message is about.

Make sure you clearly define your transfer from your qualified plan as a QDRO because if you fail to do so, the transfer is subject to taxes or penalties.

He assured his audience in Yellowknife that he wouldn't spend so much time on a single subject if he didn't take it seriously.

Refinancing approvals and rates are subject to a credit check, so yours will play a major factor in determining if this is the best option.

In the past we've posted up copious amounts of hedge fund research on gold so definitely check that out if you're looking for more insight on the subject.

If cultured meat weren't able to become cost - competitive with conventional meats, then it may have a very limited impact on the demand for conventional meats and so a very limited impact on decreasing the vast number of animals subject to industrial agriculture.

People love giving feedback, so ask your subscribers for feedback on things like email frequency, content quality, and subject matter to see if there's something you can alter to better suit their needs.

Question: So that if the subject were to exclude the sacramentality of marriage, just as if one were to exclude children, for example, at the moment of the wedding, this could also make the contracted marriage null.

So, all of you that have the nerve to bad - mouth the Lord and the existance of His Kingdom... you might want to research a bit on the subject of «generational curses» because if not for yourselves, for the sake of your children and there children, you might want to know for certain Who or What you're talking about just in case.

If you disagree with my interpretation (and it is sincerely how I interpet the text), ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations and to being taken «out of context», and has so many mistakes in it.

it's comical how religion can take a person with little more than a grade school education — and elevate their mind to the level where they literally believe they can argue subjects for which they are so completely ill - equipped — that virtually everything they posit seems as if it's coming from an 8 year old child.

So personally, I think they got exactly what they deserved for opening their mouths and complaining over 4 busses having a simple basic add that is not offensive at all except to those who believe they have the right to DICTATE (derived from Dictator) to others what they can and can not do and who SCREAM bloody murder if they are subject to the same rules they themselves wish to espouse.

So, since we're on the subject, I would really appreciate it if any pro-lifers out there could tell me how happy they are that Casey Anthony and Susan Smith didn't have an abortion.

So Huebert, if I understand you correctly you are saying that given a reliable subject with a genuine experience, there is no subjective way to determine that his observation and experience are anything other that what he claims.

So what you are trying to say is that your god has taken over from all the other 3500 + gods and because some translation of some old bs I am one of his subjects — truly you are deranged if you believe that sh!t.

Now this would be a valid argument if one understood the self in terms of individual autonomy, so that one's understanding of one's self as subject would be quite distinct from ones understanding of the cosmic or historical situation one confronted as object.

If so, the initial phase of the subjective aim is also the feeling of a proposition of which the occasion itself is the logical subject and the appropriate eternal object the predicate.

If that is your stance on the subject then you can not say without being hypocritical that all Christian dictators who murdered many people did so because they were Christian.

The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.

Try Glenn Miller's article on the issue (if you don't know, his website is the Christian ThinkTank and is another one of my favorites — he's got tons of stuff, so feel free to browse his subject or topical indices).

Her second point was that teenagers are already talking about this, so it is easy for Christians to engage with when we've got such an appealing alternative: «If the church wants to be connecting with young people, we need to be hearing what their concerns are and this has been subject young people have been really willing to open up about.»

My question was aimed for the majority of peope that also disagree with you as much as me and cling to their faith so violently that if someone even broaches the subject, they immediatly lash out and try to either convert the unbeliever, condem him, or bring up the inane, breathtakingly stupid argument of «I can't prove there is a god, but you can't prove there isn't so we're at an impass» — I think that argument is probably the most frustrating thing EVER

In our discussion we shall ask first what theological statements can be made on the subject of private prayer, examining afterwards if liturgical prayer (as distinct from the Eucharist and the administration of the sacraments with which we are not here concerned) can be preferred to it at all, and if so, what such a preference means for the practice of the Christian life.

I know Sabio, you have a lot to say on the subject, so go for it, if you feel like it, but maybe try not to say how stupid they all are, we might as well all pray to the tooth fairies or spaghetti monster.

Nevertheless, the truth which must be whole and authentic for myself must also appear as that of the others, and it is truly free and not subject to being manipulated by my fancy only if it is institutional in the wider sense, so that it is actually, and not only ideally, independent of me.

I do think that Organic churches might degenerate into endless theological debates if we are not careful, and so would love to see what they have written on the subject.

Ever notice how it seems as if every time the subject of religion, God, faith, or any subject even remotely related to them comes up, the conversation always appears to be so «black and white?»

But even if the theology here were rich and deep and uniformly brilliant, I would still be concerned about a Bible with so much ancillary material on a single subject.

Although Whitehead's Category of the Ultimate is meant to lessen the distance, so to speak, between actual occasions and societies of actual occasions, the application of Whitehead's metaphysics to persons seems troublesome; the ancient metaphysical problem of appearance and reality seems to lurk in the background, for the philosopher who wishes to identify res vera in the system soon finds herself perplexed, asking if the subjects of experience are actual occasions, societies of occasions, or sentient beings, such as persons and animals.1

Public discourse on the fallen is going to be an approximation, but if Hayes was going to wonder whether (for instance) troops who died because their Humvee ran over an IED or because they were shot by an Afghan security officer they were training should not be described as heroes, the calendar offers about 320 or so better days to bring up the subject.

If the topic of church buildings is controversial, the subject of professional pastors is even more so.

If so, subject distinguished from superject can only be pure becoming, for it has not yet reached its being.

And then, if you disagree with my interpretation, ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations, and has so many mistakes in it.

I'm not a theologian, so if you want a more professional view i suggest you look for a good book on the subject.

If so, then God's prehension of the occasion is a prehension of the occasion's subjective immediacy: the subject as subject is taken into God.

If it's so awesome, why should everyone interested in joining it be subjected to fraternity like initiation rituals steeped in secrecy?

If, as we have noted, our sole defence against materialism has been the reality of the human subject, so our sole defence against philosophical reductionism has been limited to pointing out that it is in reality a reductio adabsurdum.

What if your son or daughter told you they were gay?Would you follow your narrow - minded, religious bigotry, and curse them to hell?Or, could you find a way to change your mind and continue to love them?Would you slap your kid in the face and kick them out of the house and ask your god why he is so cruel to little - old you?Do yourself a favour and spend a moment thinking on this subject before you spout your hate - fulll nonsense again... and for crying out loud, LAY OFF THE KFC!!

And if you don't, so that according to Berry's own terms most communities will remain basically subject to the market even in the wildest scenarios of Porcher victory, you can not seriously talk of getting beyond Lockean liberalism, nor talk so critically of it that it appears «getting beyond» is an option.

And then, if you disagree with my interpretation re the OT and NT, ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations and to being taken «out of context», and has so many mistakes in it.

Suppose also that if the rung boys subjected to family abuse could have access to this MAOA therapy so that when attaining adulthood they would possess a greater sense of social responsibility exercised through greater self - control.