So nasa decided to stop spending the money on sending commands to the probe and analyzing its data and formally ended the mission.
Not exact matches
The current rate of burning fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere,
so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would take about 300 years — and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the
nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.
So far
Nasa has detected nine confirmed exoplanets, though none that would be in their star's habitable zone.
so where's the
nasa ufo vids... much better than meteor vids.
Julio E Valdivia - Silva, SETI Researcher Associate of
Nasa, who is leading the project's science team, added: «I am excited to put potatoes on Mars and even more
so that we can use a simulated Martian terrain
so close to the area where potatoes originated.»
But > still tend to believe
nasa»
so firsthe estimate of 2 probes to determine requirements and conditions a lander would have to go through before dedicating the budget to a guesswork multi-billion dollar vehicle.
(The
Nasa drama has
so far made $ 165m at the box office.)
The current rate of burning fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere,
so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would take about 300 years — and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the
nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.»
It makes me sad that
Nasa would be
so careless to title any article in this way knowing that many people don't bother to read the article which allows them to draw erroneous conclusions.
After all since it heats and cools faster, has different specific gravity, is unevenly mixed and not even in the areas where most of mans contribution from it is (see article I referenced, and the
nasa pic of this)
so how can it really be involved at all?
So the researchers, Adam Frank from the University of Rochester, New York and Gavin Schmidt, director of the
Nasa Goddard Institute for Space Studies, set out to calculate the future signature of long - vanished human society.
But on its website home page yesterday,
Nasa featured a new study which said there was a hiatus in global warming before the recent El Nino, and discussed why this was
so.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and
Nasa databases, which record anomalies of 0.54 C and 0.58 C respectively, suggest that
so far it's the warmest year on record.
As you can see from all three global datasets (CRU, NOAA and
Nasa) all the months this year for which the data has
so far been collated (January - October) were anomalously warm.
I hadn't realised Hansen was quite
so political (there I was thinking he was merely a
Nasa climate scientist) and seems to pop up everywhere.
So if samsung is copying apple just because they are making a metal case this means that car companies, aeroplanes, heck even
Nasa copied Apple....