Sentences with phrase «social models explain»

Not exact matches

In the key Lavigne vs. OPSEU decision of 1991, Justice Gérard La Forest explained that the unionization model in Canada ensures that unions have «both the resources and the mandate necessary to enable them to play a role in shaping the political, economic and social context within which particular collective agreements and labour relations disputes will be negotiated and resolved.»

Part 2 on Business Environment is where I explain my firm, RTC Advisory Services» proprietary «SPELT - G» model for business environment analysis — a six - level analysis covering SOCIAL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, LEGAL / REGULATORY, TECHNOLOGY and GLOBAL sub-environments, a framework for analysis which is arguably more robust than its global equivalents — PEST, SPEED, etc..

The team fit a mathematical contagion model for the spread of disease to the data and was able to show that the trends in the news media stories explained nearly all of the variation in the social media.

«Social media data have been suggested as a way to track the spread of a disease in a population, but there is a problem that in an emerging outbreak people also use social media to express concern about the situation,» explains study team leader Sherry Towers of ASU's Simon A. Levin Mathematical, Computational and Modeling Sciences CSocial media data have been suggested as a way to track the spread of a disease in a population, but there is a problem that in an emerging outbreak people also use social media to express concern about the situation,» explains study team leader Sherry Towers of ASU's Simon A. Levin Mathematical, Computational and Modeling Sciences Csocial media to express concern about the situation,» explains study team leader Sherry Towers of ASU's Simon A. Levin Mathematical, Computational and Modeling Sciences Center.

People who are open - minded are beginning to realise that the results of our paper are beautiful: simple mathematical models based on standard natural selection are sufficient to explain the evolution of eusociality or other phenomena in social evolution.

«It became clear to me that the standard social science model may not be adequate to explain sex ratio,» Song says.

Using human and animal models, these studies may help explain why position in social hierarchies strongly influences decision - making, motivation, and altruism, as well as physical and mental health.

Shepherd (2017) introduces a skills - based development model for L&D professionals, and explains that a skill has physical, social and cognitive dimensions.

The strategies are modeled using social studies texts, and their importance is explained.

I discuss these ideas in greater detail in Money, Blood and Revolution where I also explain how the circulatory growth model can be used to understand why the excessive use of monetary stimulus — both through low rates and quantitative easing — leads directly to: structurally low economic growth, higher social inequality, deflationary pressures, high government deficits and an inevitable pressure for higher taxation.

helps explain why the Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen predicted in 2013 that as many as half of the nation's universities may go bankrupt in the next 15 years... America's institutions of higher education, is based on a fundamentally unsustainable social and economic model.

As NSU explains, «This course provides hands - on experience for students on a number of key operational aspects of the practice of law, including the business foundation of successful law firm management; security and confidentiality of client information; marketing, public relations, advertising and social media; duties of technological competence under ABA «Ethics 20/20» amendments to the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility; predictive coding and other eDiscovery issues; client intake and case management; and issues related to the scope and composition of representation, including the unauthorized practice of law and unbundled legal services.»

CEO and founder of Common Sense, James P Steyer, explained that these companies can implement damaging decisions: «Their business models often encourage them to do whatever they can to grab attention and data and then to worry about the consequences later, even though those very same consequences may at times hurt the social, emotional and cognitive development of kids.

These full models explained over half of the variance in social participation due to the inclusion of lagged participation.

Moreover, the activity restriction model (Williamson & Christie, 2009; Williamson & Shaffer, 2000) also explains that limitations in functioning (both physical and social) and depressive symptomatology are likely adverse consequences older adults experience in the face of late life stressors, and this model is applicable to the context of poor vision (Bookwala & Lawson, 2011).

Controlling for previous levels of social participation also significantly increased the explanatory power of the model; more than 50 % of the overall variance was explained for both formal and informal social participation.

A previous study found that the Deterioration Model of Social Support has been useful in discriminating the potential of stressors to reduce support.57 They found that disaster - induced erosion of perceived social support increased symptoms of depression among both primary and secondary victims; the loss of perceived social support also mediated psychological consequences.58 The Deterioration Deterrence Model of Social Support, which is similar to support - mobilisation models, has been used to explain how the perceived deterioration of social support can be counteracted by higher levels of received social support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received suSocial Support has been useful in discriminating the potential of stressors to reduce support.57 They found that disaster - induced erosion of perceived social support increased symptoms of depression among both primary and secondary victims; the loss of perceived social support also mediated psychological consequences.58 The Deterioration Deterrence Model of Social Support, which is similar to support - mobilisation models, has been used to explain how the perceived deterioration of social support can be counteracted by higher levels of received social support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received susocial support increased symptoms of depression among both primary and secondary victims; the loss of perceived social support also mediated psychological consequences.58 The Deterioration Deterrence Model of Social Support, which is similar to support - mobilisation models, has been used to explain how the perceived deterioration of social support can be counteracted by higher levels of received social support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received susocial support also mediated psychological consequences.58 The Deterioration Deterrence Model of Social Support, which is similar to support - mobilisation models, has been used to explain how the perceived deterioration of social support can be counteracted by higher levels of received social support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received suSocial Support, which is similar to support - mobilisation models, has been used to explain how the perceived deterioration of social support can be counteracted by higher levels of received social support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received susocial support can be counteracted by higher levels of received social support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received susocial support.58 59 If post — disaster support mobilisation is implemented, stress should be positively correlated with received support.

Fischer and colleagues [21] proposed a theoretical framework that extends socio - cognitive models of learning [22] and the more recent General Learning Model [23], and explains elevated levels of risk taking in relation to media exposure not only through priming effects of risk - positive cognitions and emotions, but also through changes in the self - concept, due to (1) situational cues in the media that risk taking is rewarding instead of potentially dangerous, (2) through habitation processes and changes in risk - related social norms, and (3) through identification processes that are stronger in active vs. passive media consumption.

Eysenck's general arousal theory, which suggests such an interaction, could be modified to encompass the social learning theory, providing a more complete model to explain how upbringing and inherited traits interact to influence criminal behavior.

(Available in English and Spanish) In this 11 - minute presentation, the components of the Pyramid Model are explained, including how the model corresponds to the range of children's social - emotional needs, from nurturing relationships to addressing challenging behavModel are explained, including how the model corresponds to the range of children's social - emotional needs, from nurturing relationships to addressing challenging behavmodel corresponds to the range of children's social - emotional needs, from nurturing relationships to addressing challenging behaviors.

Written by the Yale University team that developed The RULER Approach, Creating Emotionally Literate Classrooms explains how to use the model to teach emotional skills and create the kinds of safe, supportive, and empowering environments essential for social emotional learning to occur.

explains how to use the model to teach emotional skills and create the kinds of safe, supportive, and empowering environments essential for social emotional learning to occur.

The authors explain how to use the PTR - YC model with any child who engages in repeated pattern of challenging behavior that clearly interferes with the child's social - emotional development.»

An alternative to the Romeo and Juliet effect is the social network effect, which research has shown to be a better model to explain relationship satisfaction (Bryant & Conger, 1999; Lehmiller & Agnew, 2007).

Structural equation modeling revealed that parent - child discrepancies in parenting reports could be explained by a latent factor which was a significant predictor of child internalizing problems and social competence, but not of externalizing problems, after adjusting for initial internalizing and externalizing problems.

bThe explained fraction (XF) of the social network differential in the coefficient of depressive symptom for widowed elders was calculated by the following equation: (coefficient of Model 1 − coefficient of Model 2) / coefficient of Model 1.

In the case of mania the model accounted for 52 % of the total variance for this love attitude but even on the Storge where the model had its lowest predictive value of 22 % it is worth remarking on how a significant amount of love can be explained by social rather than personality factors.

Nath, Borkowski, Whitman, and Schellenbach (1991; Schellenbach, Whitman, & Borkowski, 1992) have adapted Belsky's model to more appropriately explain parenting processes in the adolescent social environment by placing a strong emphasis on social support systems that incorporate the family of origin and peer groups and by giving social support systems a more central role in their model than does Belsky (1984).

Social isolation variables had a weaker relationship with Emotional Symptoms: once demographics and social isolation variables were controlled for, the model explained 17 % of the variation between cases, compared with 2 % when only demographics were modSocial isolation variables had a weaker relationship with Emotional Symptoms: once demographics and social isolation variables were controlled for, the model explained 17 % of the variation between cases, compared with 2 % when only demographics were modsocial isolation variables were controlled for, the model explained 17 % of the variation between cases, compared with 2 % when only demographics were modelled.