The National Republican Congressional Committee sent an unusual gift to a Democrat running for Congress in Pennsylvania: a book titled Why
Socialism Works.
And
socialism works quite well in some European countries, so does universal healthcare.
the largest flaw in socialism is their constant lying to themselves that
Socialism works and therefor there is never a self examination to try and determine why their policies are consistently, failing.
Back then, communism MEANT something — even most liberals saw great evil in Stalin's regime, and scaring voters with the specter of
socialism worked because there really WAS a socialist model attempting to compete with capitalism.
Not exact matches
Price has been pilloried on Fox News and trashed by the multimillionaire Limbaugh («I hope this company is a case study in MBA programs on how
socialism does not
work, because it's gonna fail»).
«Actually Marx already predicted that there could be a kind of
socialism which combined socialist principles with the achievements of Western capitalist civilizations but he didn't say how this kind of
socialism would
work since there was no evidence available during his lifetime,» Su Wei, a professor at a party school for ideological training in Chongqing, in southwestern China, told the Global Times.
INcreasing your workers wages because you are prospering and their hard
work helped get you there is not
socialism, it's just good Capitalism.
People seem to miss this is really just another piece of
socialism, where
working Americans pay for free birth control for 20 something's while the latter go buy the latest iPhone and drink at bars.
Socialism seems to be
working very well for the corporate, banking and government elite.
The only way
socialism can possibly
work at all, we are told, is by being authoritarian.
Under
socialism no one goes hungry; everyone who is able
works; those who
work receive benefits commensurate with their social contribution; and there are not the radical disparities in wealth and opportunities characteristic of capitalism.
And to the one who wrote
socialism is
working in Europe: it is now 4 years later and Europe is in shambles.
Socialism has never
worked, except for those at the very top.
Therefore, if we as Christians are going to
work to improve the systems in which people live — as indeed we must — then we need to avoid promoting or condemning capitalism or
socialism as such.
Nevertheless, in spite of the great advances made by workers and in spite of having seen that
socialism can not offer them a worker's utopia or even an alternative to
working for someone else, we must take note that there are still a couple of very troubling aspects to the division between owners and workers.
In other words, they saw clearly that along with the struggle for justice for the industrial
working class, we must simultaneously go forward with the liberation of dalits, tribals and women if we have to realize an Indian
socialism.
The old
socialism considered the industrial
working class as the bearers of the new society.
Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev has followed his earlier initiatives in reducing nuclear weapons by making two announcements of momentous import: economically,
socialism does not
work, and politically, democracy is the road to the future.
These pacts were a defence strategy against the danger posed by the threat of a more aggressive
socialism created by the
working classes.
Many countries, Britain, Canada, France, and much of Europe are democratic governments that have kept elements of
socialism that
work very well.
The four concepts were praxis, the poor, oppression, and
socialism, and the Latin American proposition was that through the practical
work of building socialist societies, the poor of the third world would throw off the oppression they suffered at the hands of the first world, especially the United States.
I suggest that Japan and Cuba provide far more positive models of capitalism and
socialism at
work.
Nothing
works in that joke of a country... communism failed, and so did
socialism... while democracy was dead on arrival.
The quote» u do nt
work u do nt eat» was said to people who were praticing a form of christian
socialism — the statement was not an endorsement of capitalism
The question remains, however, whether any form of
socialism can be made to
work economically.
capitalism
works with an underlying layer of
socialism.
By arguing that
socialism doesn't
work, free - market ideologues may enforce the misguided notion that no publicly owned and operated venture can possibly succeed.
On reading and reflecting on this
work, I am reminded of why it is that I remained in dialogue with the Boston - area branch of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (DSOC), founded by Harrington and led locally by John Cort (author of Christian
Socialism) for more than a decade.
Conceivably, the only
socialism that could
work would be that which develops in a society deeply bonded by religious values.
We don't want
socialism or egalitarianism in our government, but we're curious about how it
works so well let our sports leagues operate that way because ultimately it's only sports and doesn't really matter.
Bottom line: no, there were no
working examples of
socialism reformed in the lines of Dubcek's proposals.
@JustinBeagley - this seems like it's entirely written from the
socialism = communism = evil and will never
work = yay captialism viewpoint, isn't it?
My decision to vote «Leave» is based on my belief in democracy,
socialism, and a political economy which protects the living standards of the British
working class.
Hyndman, in the Historical Basis of
Socialism in England (1883), argued that «in looking back through the history of our country, there is one period when by common consent men and women who
worked with their hands were better off than at any time before or since».
Instead he wrote, in 1946 in «Why I Write» that «Every line of serious
work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic
Socialism, as I understand it», which was the argument for justice and liberty.
These are fine intellectual pedigrees, but they are not the full story of
socialism in Britain by any means, especially among
working - class Labour voters.
Fraga surrounded himself with a younger team and focused his speeches on the risks of
socialism, such as the creation of dependent societies, which, through their support of welfare and subsidies, weakened values such as
work, responsibility and merit; in turn, societies would become less competitive and free.
That's why Progressivism /
socialism will never
work no matter how many times it's tried.
So much for
socialism (which you acknoweledge being on the left) having anything to do with LESS top down power at
work.
21) A rare personal passage describes Corbyn getting his
socialism from his parents and
working as a teacher and trade union organiser.
Laski's main political role came as a writer and lecturer on every topic of concern to the left, including
socialism, capitalism,
working conditions, eugenics, woman suffrage, imperialism, decolonisation, disarmament, human rights, worker education, and Zionism.
But all these schemes prove is make a lesson from the past one for the present, too — that
socialism doesn't
work, and predistribution won't, either.
Democratic
socialism means that we must create an economy that
works for all, not just the very wealthy.
If the 13 million votes received by self - styled «democratic socialist» Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries accomplished nothing else positive, it put the questions of
socialism and independent
working - class politics up for public discussion.
More importantly, by entering the Democratic Party, Sanders broke with the socialist principle of independent
working - class political action.1 He became the «sheepdog» herding progressives, who had the option of voting for the Green ticket of Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka in the general election, back into a party run by the billionaire class he professes to oppose.2 Nevertheless, the broad liberal to radical American left is now discussing what
socialism is and debating whether the Left should be inside or outside the Democratic Party — or both inside and outside.
Blue Labour launched as a «deeply conservative
socialism that places family, faith and
work at the heart of a new politics»
National
Socialism was staunchly against capitalism, and whilst it didn't oppose privately owned companies (unlike its «cousin» / rival, communism), it did dictate that everyone (every German in «nazism's» case) was equal and was required to help one another and
work for their nation and fellow Germans rather than personal gain.
Marxism is the body of
work by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels and covers subjects like economics,
Socialism / Communism.
Marxism - Leninism is an oxymoron, no one can deny Lenin didn't understand Marxism but he distorted Marx whenever it suited his own ends, for instance
Socialism became the interim stage to Communism for Lenin only when he realised Communism was an impossibility in Russia, infact Lenin admitted that's all that had been achieved in Russia was state Capitalism (1918) and Lenin himself thought
Socialism / Communism wouldn't be established by the
working classes for 500 years if left to their own devices.Sadly
Socialism and the Russian workers have paid a heavy price for Lenin's distortions of Marxism.
If that is the sum of our electoral «pragmatism,» however, then we may as well abandon any practical
working goal of democratic
socialism.