Not exact matches
It is true that Rawls
did not argue for a citizen's basic liberty to own productive resources; he believed that justice could be achieved under different
regimes of property - ownership, whether fundamentally capitalist or
socialist in nature.
Beyond that, whether a
socialist or communist policy
regime would support anti-trust laws or not doesn't matter.
Of course there is a continuum with Pol Pot type communistic
regimes at one end and
socialist states like the Scandinavian ones on the left side of the continuum and the US on the right; and while I don't want to get into the relative virtues of socialism, or not, from the viewpoint of green ideology, individual rights such as property rights and equality before the law are anthema to them as I note here:
The president, like his globalist cadres at the UN, is working feverishly to use climate change to remake the political order of the globe — before the wheels come completely off the global - warming bandwagon — so that countries and their peoples kowtow to a new international
socialist regime based out of the UN, a
regime that literally tells individuals what they can and can not
do.
Of course they don't think the
regimes that promoted this idea were necessarily evil or that the
socialist basis of these
regimes is necessarily bad, indicating that their sense of ethics and morals is somewhat compromised.