In
Socratic man, we noted a further development of great importance.
However, for
Socratic man this idea was not determinative for the axial development.
The limitation which has been noted was that
Socratic man's self - identification with one factor within the soul alongside other factors prevented the incipient sense of personal responsibility for the psychic life in general from coming to fruition.
Not exact matches
While the
Socratic self - examination was self - serving, the Bible reveals the larger importance that acts of individual
men and women can assume.
Between
man and
man the
Socratic midwifery is the highest relation, and begetting is reserved for the God, whose love is creative, but not merely in the sense which Socrates so beautifully expounds on a certain festal occasion.
But the God had also another reason; for between
man and
man the
Socratic relationship is the highest and truest.
However, with all this we have not yet got any further than the
Socratic position; for, as Socrates would say, if this comes about, then it only shows that such a
man had not understood what is right.
The
Socratic world into which Egyptian or Syrian
man was called by Hellenization was indeed an alien and resented world.
However, with respect to this
Socratic position, as with respect to many other
Socratic positions, how many
men have felt a need of going further?
What an innumerable number have felt the need of going further than the
Socratic ignorance — presumably because they felt that it was impossible for them to stay there; for in every generation how many
men are there that are capable, even for only a month, of enduring and existentially expressing ignorance about everything?
Socratic reason, in its modern scientific form, has rendered the Buddhist doctrines of no - self and no - God more plausible to many modern
men than opposed Christian convictions.
However, in this case, unlike those of
Socratic and prophetic existence,
men experienced themselves as thrust out of preaxial existence by partly unwelcome forces, concretely the cultural imperialism of the Hellenistic empires, which drew
men toward
Socratic existence.
Because of the essential character of
Socratic existence, the identification of the self with active reason, Socrates could not attribute to the self a responsibility for the evil which a
man enacted.
There is some intellectual dishonesty, congruence, and implicit condescension in Bill Nye's arguments which is quite the turn - off for me, a college student, looking up to this
man and trying to learn the truth using the
Socratic method.
This spirit has been suffocated by the
Socratic presumption that «virtue is knowledge;
man sins only from ignorance; he who is virtuous is happy,» and Nietzsche indicts his age for «that Socratism which is bent on the destruction of myth.
The EVIL GENIUS over at Stand By For Mind Control Blog nails the problem with modern screenwriting, as evidenced by
MAN OF STEEL, right here in
Socratic dialogue mode: