Sentences with phrase «solar magnetic flux»

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010JGRA..11501104S «We have reconstructed the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), its radial component, and the open solar magnetic flux using the solar modulation potential derived from cosmogenic 10Be radionuclide data for a period covering the past 9300 years.

During the Maunder Minimum, the strength of the IMF was approximately 2 nT compared to a mean value of 6.6 nT for the past 40 years, corresponding to an increase of the open solar magnetic flux of about 350 %.

Volker Doormann says: July 27, 2011 at 2:38 pm http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010JGRA..11501104S We have reconstructed the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), its radial component, and the open solar magnetic flux using the solar modulation potential derived from cosmogenic 10Be radionuclide data for a period covering the past 9300 years.

Ice core measurements of beryllium indicate a less variable TSI while modelling from solar magnetic flux show a greater decrease in TSI during the Maunder Minimum.

Here, we develop a semi-empirical model describing the heliospheric modulation of GCRs in terms of heliospheric parameters such as the open solar magnetic flux, the tilt angle of the heliospheric current sheet and the polarity of the large scale solar magnetic field.

My still unanswered question is why does the hockey stick shape of Earth temperatures show up in a chart of the Solar magnetic flux?

Note that the IPCC concentrates on Solar Irradiance, but ignores other solar energies such as that associated with Solar Magnetic Flux that has more than doubled since 1900.

My still unanswered question is why does the hockey stick shape of Earth temperatures show up in a chart of the Solar magnetic flux?

Not exact matches

We try to be as plausible as possible about the astrophysics and creating a solar system with a system of moons, and then the atmospheric conditions, even the magnetic fields of the Flux Vortex.

Fine details of a magnetic flux rope captured by the New Solar Telescope at Big Bear Solar Observatory for Solar Active Region 11817 on 2013 August 11.

Scientists at NJIT's Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO) have captured the first high - resolution images of the flaring magnetic structures known as solar flux ropes at their point of origin in the Sun's chromospSolar Observatory (BBSO) have captured the first high - resolution images of the flaring magnetic structures known as solar flux ropes at their point of origin in the Sun's chromospsolar flux ropes at their point of origin in the Sun's chromosphere.

Another scientist examined the inner workings of the sun through the oscillation of sound waves propagating through the solar interior; yet another looked at magnetic maps to chart the shifting flux across the sun.

Extreme conditions of solar wind, UV flux and surface temperature, in combination with patterns of plasma precipitation to the surface guided by Mercury's magnetic field, result in a dynamic exosphere configuration.

After all, the implied changes in GCR flux are huge compared to what is expected from the gentle modulation of the Earth's magnetic field arising from recent solar activity changes (not that there's any trend in those that would explain recent warming).

the distance of the body from the Sun, determining the properties of solar wind and solar energetic particles (SEPs), the solar photon flux and the properties of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) at that location;

On this figure they plot the Jones global mean temperature together with a global magnetic index (the aa index), a cosmic ray flux index (Climax) and the PMOD composite satellite record of solar irradiance.

Potential topics include: (1) Advanced numerical modelling of magnetic flux tubes / loops in the low solar atmosphere (2) Forward modelling of spectroscopic and narrowband EUV observations of the low solar atmosphere, (3) Solar Rotational Tomography of EUV and / or coronagraph coronal observations, (4) Automated detection and prediction of coronal mass ejections, (5) Analysis of solar wind turbulence observations by in situ spacecraft, (6) Eclipse instrumentation, observations and data analsolar atmosphere (2) Forward modelling of spectroscopic and narrowband EUV observations of the low solar atmosphere, (3) Solar Rotational Tomography of EUV and / or coronagraph coronal observations, (4) Automated detection and prediction of coronal mass ejections, (5) Analysis of solar wind turbulence observations by in situ spacecraft, (6) Eclipse instrumentation, observations and data analsolar atmosphere, (3) Solar Rotational Tomography of EUV and / or coronagraph coronal observations, (4) Automated detection and prediction of coronal mass ejections, (5) Analysis of solar wind turbulence observations by in situ spacecraft, (6) Eclipse instrumentation, observations and data analSolar Rotational Tomography of EUV and / or coronagraph coronal observations, (4) Automated detection and prediction of coronal mass ejections, (5) Analysis of solar wind turbulence observations by in situ spacecraft, (6) Eclipse instrumentation, observations and data analsolar wind turbulence observations by in situ spacecraft, (6) Eclipse instrumentation, observations and data analysis.

How these cyclical climate take place is still unknown, but they «are most likely caused by variations in the solar wind and associated magnetic fields that affect the flux of cosmic rays incident on cloudiness, and thereby control the amount of sunlight reaching the earth's surface and thus the climate.»

The results of analysis of thermobaric field variations for the periods of invasion of abnormally powerful solar cosmic ray fluxes and magnetic storms confirm the reality of manifestation of heliogeophysical disturbances.

I guess the question is whether the magnetic field of the earth can affect the solar UV flux.

Similarly to the solar magnetic modulation, high geomagnetic field intensity decreases the flux of galactic cosmic rays and radionuclide production rates and the opposite for low geomagnetic field intensity.

The solar wind is a flux of charged particles that flows at supersonic velocity from the Sun's outer atmosphere (the corona) and carries with it the solar magnetic field.

Clearly, there is a strong relationship between solar activity (magnetic solar flux) and global temperatures.

«The solar wind, because it is an extended ionized gas of very high electrical conductivity, drags some magnetic flux out of the Sun, thereby filling the heliosphere with the weak interplanetary magnetic field.

We also use the solar magnetic field (B0) and F10.7 flux data from http://spidr.ngdc.noaa.gov; these data are available only for the last two and last five SCs, respectively.

The entropy values obtained from the solar magnetic field (B0) and F10.7 flux (Φs) are respectively multiplied by 0.77 and 1.24 to view them on a common scale.

We thank the SIDC team, World Data Center, NOAA - NGDC, and SPIDR, NGDCNOAA, for the data on sunspot, SC characteristics, solar magnetic field, and F10.7 flux data respectively.

The solar heliosphere is the name for the tenuous gas and pieces of magnetic flux that is ejected off the surface of the sun.

These estimates of the entropy are shown in Figure 6, and it is clear that the entropy determined from physical parameters such as the F10.7 flux and solar magnetic field shows variations similar to those in the entropy obtained from the sunspot number.

The planets may have a spin - orbit coupling effect on the Sun which affects its rotation rate, which would then affect the solar dynamo and sunspot production, and therefore the build up of magnetic flux at the poles, and the length of a solar cycle: if the solar cycle is weaker with less sunspots, it'll take longer for the build up of opposing flux to reach the point when it flips the poles.

I was looking for a correspondence of magnetic flux and solar UV — see Fig 5 — it seems to be there (but I wonder why).

We're finding that the sun is massively connected to the Earth via magnetic flux tubes [nasa.gov] that dump charged particles into the magnetosphere, and that the day side of the magnetosphere is sometimes wide open [nasa.gov] to solar wind.

Short term solar cycles of the 27 day rotation periods, due to the polarity shifts in magnetic flux changes in the solar wind, The moon has a North / South declinational component as part of it's set of orbital parameters.

(They comment on the geomagnetic field's influence on cosmic ray flux in addition to the influence of the solar - driven interplanetary magnetic field; although I skipped over bothering to depict that in the prior graph compilation, which is very illustrative even without it, Vukcevic seems quite on to something there).

The total magnetic flux leaving the Sun (dragged out by the solar wind) has risen by a factor of 2.3 since 1901 (Lockwood et al. 1999).

The two solar cycles from 1976 to 1996 had a stronger solar magnetic field with more GCR deflection leading to 3 % less average cosmic ray flux, fewer shading clouds, and the global warming scare.

We propose that the cycle may be caused by modulation of cosmic ray (CR) flux by the Solar system vertical oscillation (64 My period) in the galaxy, the galactic north - south anisotropy of CR production in the galactic halo / wind / termination shock (due to the galactic motion toward the Virgo cluster), and the shielding by galactic magnetic fields.

Cosmogenic isotopes provide the most extendable indirect data on the cosmic ray flux, the state of the heliosphere, and hence on the solar magnetic activity during the past.

Recent work attempts to account for the chain of physical processes in which solar magnetic fi elds modulate the heliosphere, in turn altering the penetration of the galactic cosmic rays, the flux of which produces the cosmogenic isotopes that are subsequently deposited in the terrestrial system following additional transport and chemical processes.

The solar magnetic cycle that flips polarity at the poles approximately every 11 years is dependent on the reversing flux from spent sunspots that migrate to the poles.

Solar Flux would be necessary to look into combined to magnetic variations.

Since 1935, solar physicists have subscribed to what we could call the «eruption theory» where 11 - yr cycle is produced as a unit by a well - developed physical theory that does not rely on excitation of «modes» but on a continuously progressing generation of activity by magnetic induction amplifying existing flux and eventually dying out.

It could be solar, a change of the Earth's magnetic field, or a change in the galactic flux of cosmic rays [unlikely, but possible].

They are most likely caused by variations in the solar wind and associated magnetic fields that affect the flux of cosmic rays incident on the earth's atmosphere.

Many believe that increased water vapor, solar variations in radiation and magnetic flux, our relative position in the solar system, the tilt of our planet's axis, the clearing of our atmosphere of pollutants which allows more sunlight to reach the ground, or our position in the Milky Way galaxy that affects the amount of radiation reaching our atmosphere and affecting cloud formation, are also important and are not (and can not be yet) adequately considered in the computer models used by the IPCC consensus.

This is in agreement with the recent results of [CITE], but it is in contrast to the earlier analysis of [CITE], and suggests that the source of the irradiance variations is the same for cycles 22 and 23, namely the evolution of the magnetic flux at the solar surface.

This provides strong support for the hypothesis that solar irradiance variations are caused by changes in the amount and distribution of magnetic flux at the solar surface.

Recent reconstructions based on the magnetic field surface distribution (Wang et al. 2005; Krivova et al. 2007) and on an extrapolation of the assumed correlation between the TSI and the open magnetic flux (see definition in Lockwood et al. 1999) during the last three minima (Steinhilber et al. 2009; Fröhlich 2009) resulted in a low solar forcing value within the range ΔFP − M ≈ 0.1 − 0.2 W / m2.

But of course, if you ignore the COMPLETE solar spectrum, I guess you can (need to) ignore the effect changes in the earth's magnetic flux would have on that radiation.

There is no direct correlation or coincidence over observed time to indicate that it is «most likely caused by variations in the solar wind and associated magnetic fields that affect the flux of cosmic rays incident on the earth's atmosphere»