In Defense of Florida's Flat Ban on the Personal
Solicitation of Campaign Contributions From Attorneys by Candidates for Judicial Office PDF · Burt Neuborne · 68 Vand.
The Justices» questions generally fall along anticipated ideological divides (e.g., the conservative Justices seem to support uninhibited
solicitation of campaign contributions and the liberal Justices seem to support more regulation in judicial elections).
Not exact matches
De Blasio
campaign spokesman Dan Levitan defended the timing
of the
solicitation, claiming Hizzoner «has received more low - dollar
contributions from individual, everyday New Yorkers than any candidate for mayor — Democrat or Republican — in more than two decades.
Such promotions should disclose, at the point
of solicitation: (a) the actual or anticipated portion
of the purchase price that will benefit the charity (e.g., 5 cents will be contributed to abc charity for every xyz company product sold), (b) the duration
of the
campaign (e.g., the month
of October), (c) any maximum or guaranteed minimum
contribution amount (e.g., up to a maximum
of $ 200,000).
The Arkansas Supreme Court held that the canon was narrowly tailored to the state's interests in judicial impartiality and open - mindedness, and that White was inapplicable because the facts
of the case and the details
of the
solicitation canon were distinguishable: «We do not believe anyone can seriously argue that a judge personally soliciting
campaign contributions from attorneys having cases before him or her should be permissible.»
The court also held that the state's
solicitation clause, which prohibited judges and judicial candidates from personally soliciting
campaign contributions (but allowed
campaign committees to do so on behalf
of the candidates), was unconstitutional to the extent that it prohibited candidates from signing
solicitation letters and making
campaign appeals before large groups.
Applying the balancing test, the court concluded that
solicitation clause, which prohibited personal
solicitation of contributions and required the use
of a
campaign committee, was constitutional.
Specifically, Buchanan noted Maggio's illegal
solicitation and acceptance
of campaign contributions in violation
of state law.