Something about his actions or habits had led you to believe he's having an affair - credit card receipts, strange phone calls, weird numbers on the cell phone bill.
Not exact matches
When you're
about to take
action on
something, notice what's going on in your head and body.
Then, whenever
something happens and you need to decide how to respond... or whenever you need to make a decision
about the best course of
action... take a moment and close your hand around your coin.
We wanted to talk
about what we'd do if we were confronted by a large number of users demanding
action because of
something on our site that they deemed unreasonable or hurtful.
[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find
something you care
about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive
action [28:30] Taking
action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your
action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?
He also said an accelerated program allows shareholders to see immediate
action, which is «important to signal a higher degree of confidence in
something shareholders care a great deal
about.»
For example, you can split test your Facebook content (
something I've written
about previously) to get a clearer idea of how factors like content length, image, time of posting, call - to -
action message, and targeting criteria might impact a post's success.
Both want to take
something that has established laws governing the line between legal and criminal
actions and throw away any reason in the name of «how some feel
about it».
Whether or not this show will also last long enough for fans to follow Riley through junior high, high school, college and into marriage remains to be seen, but the first clip is here, and there is
something heartwarming
about seeing Cory and Topanga back in
action.
When you are talking
about something as fundamentally important as who a person loves and wants to spend their life with, rejecting their
actions is the same as rejecting the person.
The prophets, too, were accustomed to perform
actions having
about them
something of the solemnity of ritual, with the intention that they should symbolize truths which they wished to enunciate.
I think there's
something holy and Christ - like
about his
action.
When we say that a particular outer
action is peculiarly ours we mean that the act is such that it in fact is an expression of our inner being, and thus we mean to imply
something about the intentionality of the act.
This is
about Tony doing the same thing Tony has been doing all along: using his greater money and time resources to bury Julie in legal
actions, adding another one every time he sees
something new out of his control, forcing her to spend her more limited money and time responding and defending herself.
Would one not have to say
something about God's
action which did not hold true anywhere else?
What else is religion for but to fill in gaps — in our knowledge of how the world should work, in our justifications for our
actions, in our responsibility for things we ought to do
something about but don't?
A few of the writers and prophets of the Old Testament noticed
something very peculiar
about God's
actions toward those people who cursed Him.
Something about the way he gave it seemed to remove his
action from the categories of everyday experience: «they did not understand
about the loaves.»
not seeing
something doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but what's more important here is the
actions of all of the idiots spending thousands on billboards that will not change anyone's mind
about anything.
Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all
about her death when she encountered Jesus
something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our
actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not
about sin but its all
about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
There is unquestionably
something deeply disturbing, even revolutionary,
about Jesus» inclusive
actions and teachings.
Polls do not a just cause make, but they do tell us
something about popular consent, and it does seem churlish of those who disagree with the U.S.
action not to acknowledge that.
He was expected to say
something in support of the
action of the Church in France, but even when on 15 June he received at the Vatican French MPs belonging to the «Group of friendship France - Holy See», he said nothing at all
about it, even in passing.
As a leader, it is one thing to talk
about generosity and sisterhood, but it is
something entirely else to put it all into
action together.
But that still leaves us with the guilt, and here's
something I've noticed
about guilt in regards to
actions that don't intrinsically hurt anyone: Non-religious people don't seem to suffer from it!
Each layman must do
something about this himself perhaps through channels of fellowship, study,
action, prayer, and personal witness.
Reblogged this on Barbara Moran Blog and commented:
Something to think
about on the journey... Contemplation in
Action and being radically available to God's will.
Jesus» core message in most of the gospels is
about «belief» in God — but belief that means
something — is tied to
something — is shown in one's
actions.
Many in Hollywood say they see the spiritual - memoir - turned - movie as the next hot genre, suggesting there are ongoing talks
about turning Lauren Winner's «Girl Meets God» into a romantic comedy, Ian Cron's «Jesus, My Father, the CIA, and Me» into an
action flick, Anne Lamott's «Traveling Mercies» into an indie road trip film, Kathleen Norris» «The Cloister Walk» into
something really creepy involving monks.»
As I define them, «belief «is an opinion
about something or someone, while «faith» is a willingness to commit to a course of
action on the basis of that opinion.
If anything, the fans
actions might actually spur the players on, or at least get Wenger thinking
about finally changing
something for once!
There's
something about affecting the on - field
action with subterfuge that is just unseemly.
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete
about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more
about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their
actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that
something is rotten in the state of Denmark
Why don't they write
about something interesting like «THE HUNT FOR ABOU DIABY» Does he still exist????????? anyone knowing information on the wherabouts of this tall French midfielder missing in
action, please email us!!!!!!!!
Replace your words with an
action: Recognize that if you've gotten to the point where you're
about to blurt
something out that you may regret, it's a sign that you should leave the argument altogether.
How
about something a little more rugged and ready for
action?
Since the purpose of anxiety is to make us more alert and try to resolve or avoid
something that we are stressed out
about, it is accompanied by a sense of agitation and readiness for
action.
Set up scenarios where one of the
action figures or stuffed toys takes his toy or says
something bad
about him... then coach him on ways he can respond appropriately.
The reasons are as yet unknown but the authors of the study point out that «It is possible that babies fed to a routine become relatively more passive participants in the world: feeding (arguably the most important event in their lives) is
something which is done to them, rather than
something which their own desires and
actions play a part in bringing
about.
Julia Cameron says if you complain
about something enough in your writing day after day (if you're disciplined with daily journaling which I'm not)-- that you simply can't continue with the same problem or situation without your mind generating new
action or perspective.
When you ask your child to do
something, whether they are toddlers or teenagers, you need to think
about how they will process it, how their temperament predisposes them to react to the request, and what your
actions will be if they don't do it.
This deal is a general plus for both Cuomo and Dean, regardless of what the imbecilic troglodytes at the Post think, and no one cares
about hypocrasy on tax issues unless you disagree with the results — for example, if you promise to do
something unpopular and instead do
something popular, no one attacks you for the hypocrasy of said
action, because the result is popular.
And without ways for people to organize themselves and dispel rumors before and after the president's fall from power, the entire situation could have descended into chaos —
something that would have given the government an excuse to take just
about any
actions imaginable in the name of public order.
The second question is related to the above: a «free market» baseline of justice is
about procedure - how outcomes are arrived at, who is involved in making decisions, has rights over their own
actions, how
actions are agreed by parties etc. (or
something like that) whereas equality is an outcome, that may or may not be achieved under various procedural arrangements, and may or may not be viewed as desirable by people who hold different views
about what forms of society - specifications over who has what rights to do what to who.
Funny thing
about military
action and intelligence; it's not
something we devolve to layman on stack exchange.
Its just that there's
something about Obama that makes you and other hysterics view his every
action differently.
Loud, ineffective measures like «sanctions» tend to be feeble responses by governments that want to tell each other that they are «doing
something»
about an unwanted
action by a sovereign state, without actually going to war.
Pollitically speaking the boycott is used by people who are not comfortable with
something in a certain area (economic, social, health, etc) or
about an
action.
Beth Gilinsky, founder of the Jewish
Action Alliance, said that between the uproar over the mosque near Ground Zero and the controversy over the Empire State Building lighting, she felt there was
something «very screwed up
about what's going on in this city.»
It is
about asking ourselves if a particular course of
action will be helpful or inflammatory; whether
something we want to do or even want to wear can be better explained or even changed if it alienates others.