Sentences with phrase «something about that number»

Something about that number feels monumental, doesn't it?

So sorry for your loss — these children deserve to matter, doing something about the numbers will mean they do matter.

The study is important, Hubbard says, because «it shows that we can reliably measure something about number sense and that the number sense is stable over time.»

There are some issues, indeed, maybe you saw in the comments of the other video someone asking something about these numbers, too.

Granted, I'm not much of a baby blue person myself, but something about this number has me whistling a different tune.

Am I misunderstanding something about these numbers or is your 6e21J per year more historical (like me)?

There's something about numbers.

Not exact matches

Adam Alter: «Nomophobia» is a new word that's being coined to describe no mobile phobia, and it's the idea that a lot of us, in thinking about not having our phones, experience something like a phobia, and this is supposed to describe hundreds of millions of people today, and I'm sure that number is growing at the moment.

Web metrics are the numbers that let you know something about your website's performance and your return on marketing dollars (ROMD), and web analytics, the most popular being Google Analytics, is the software that lets you measure those numbers.

Using the app takes about five minutes each day: participants in our experiment log in to Plasticity's online platform, pick a number out of 100 to rate their happiness level that day and post a brief note about something they're grateful for at work.

Think first, say game players, about whether you're prepared to reveal the numbers that make games into something more than trivial exercises in employee manipulation.

There really is something daunting about approaching a round - numbered birthday.

«In fact it was a modest failure, but there was something about it that excited some small number of people.

One example that I read about, Stanford University, a teacher in artificial intelligence offered a class, a couple of hundred kids in the class, he offered it online to 30,000 people, or 20,000 people, and if I remember correctly when he gave the test there were 400 people, or something like that, that did better than the number one kid at Stanford.

It's a perpetual cat - and - mouse game, but Ayrapetov, for one, is optimistic that ransomware's days are numbered, with a caveat: «In about two years, it will probably be difficult enough for the malware writers that they'll start looking for something new.»

Yet there's something irresistibly seductive about numbers that seem so rigorously mathematical.

We wanted to talk about what we'd do if we were confronted by a large number of users demanding action because of something on our site that they deemed unreasonable or hurtful.

But later in the month, when the inflation numbers for the previous month are released, we should really say something about real, as in inflation - adjusted, wage growth.

So, you're talking about low single digits rather than, if you just looked at the headline number, something like 11.5 % growth.

I can't count the number of times when I'm looking at something and pick up the phone and talk to [one of our CEOs] and if it's in any one of their adjacent industries, they know more about it in 15 minutes than an investor can learn in a lifetime.»

It's something we actually live minute - by - minute when we bring on a new property management contract, run the numbers on an apartment community we're thinking about buying, or map out the strategic direction for our company in the coming year.

If they actually cared about sin, they'd be doing something about the MUCH GREATER number of Christian ADULTERERS who have divorced and remarried.

I thought we already talked about numbers game and lots of people believing in something doesn't make that something true?

That said, I also think its obvious that there is something pathological about the shrill and feverish mentality of many pundits and commentators on the Right, many of whom I probably agree with on a number of substantive points.

I can't count the number of times that we would be so frustrated with each other — because Rick and I are polar opposites in just about every way you can think of — we'd get in an argument about something, and inside would be going: «Argh, this is so hard, I do not want to be married to you — you are driving me crazy!»

Jules suggests to me that as many as eighty per cent of techies are religious, but that this number is highly uncertain because the subject matter is taboo among most modern scientists; it's not something we talk about in our daily working lives.

In some sense, indeed, Kierkegaard's life could be written as a kind of dark comedy; despite his premature death, and a great number of sadnesses that afflicted him along the way, there was something enchantingly absurd about his character, a certain benign perversity that often prompted him to make himself willfully ridiculous, and a peculiarly touching element of the ludicrous that clung to him all the way to his early grave.

«16 Thus, Lindsell posits that the cock crowed six times for Peter (in order to harmonize the Gospel accounts); he concludes that «about 23,500» people died on a certain single day (in order to account for Numbers 25:9 citing 24,000 as the figure while Paul asserts in 1 Corinthians 10:8 that it was 23,000); and he hypothesizes that the «molten sea» described in 2 Chronicles 4 as being ten cubits in diameter and thirty cubits in circumference (although we know that C = BD, I. e., the circumference of something ten cubits in diameter is actually 31.4159 cubits) can be understood if the vessel is considered to have sides that are four inches thick, and if the measurement for diameter is taken from the outer edges while the measurement of circumference is taken from the inner edge.17

Oh btw NP, I read yesterday that in the Greek, the verse about how Jesus made himself the lowest of the low and a slave etc. «not considering equality with God something to be grasped at» (sorry no good at remembering verse numbers, but you'll know the one) actually says that he stripped himself naked.

The process is simple arithmetic: time the first point, multiply that by the number of «points» announced («I have three things to say about this matter this morning») and one has not only something to anticipate but a fair estimate as to when to expect it.

It is dependent on a situation where something is «right», or «wrong» regardless of what any number of people think about it.

But I was impressed by the number of people who interpreted Question 9 — «I believe I bear fruit for the Lord, that I live a life worthy of Christ» — as saying something about social involvement.

When this belief was coupled with the notion of a last judgement which would not occur until God «had accomplished the number of his elect», in words from still another prayer, it said something about the corporate nature of human life, the equally corporate nature of whatever destiny men have, and the need for patient waiting until our fellowmen have found their capacity for fulfillment along with us.

What would be the implications if we decided to limit the amount of things we knew about in order to have time to do something compassionate about a fewer number of things?

Glad to see something with substance is going to be on t.v. - AND To vdanker I guessed you missed the part when «(Osteen) had been approached for a number of years by different networks with ideas along the same kind of lines but it just didn't come together,» So its not about the money!

However, I had a meeting last week and served coffee alongside these beauties and the consensus was unanimous after that day ---- I must at least mention something about this little number.

Usually a huge fan of salads overflowing with delicious goodness, I wouldn't have thought that a simple cucumber salad would really get my wow on, but something about this little number was magic.

I am making your pie and was wondering about step number 3... i do nt have pie weights or anything... is there something i can use in place?

Maybe it's the endless number of combinations for this comfort food, but there's something about dips that we really dig.

«We received outstanding quality awards from a number of highly regarded auditors, something that can be very difficult to achieve when you are talking about food processing,» Walsh says.

We're not saying that vodka is a magical substance (okay, we say that all the time...) but based just purely on the number of available vodka mixed drinks, it is obviously not a terrible stretch of the imagination to say that there is something magical about it.

Bolt has now confirmed he's set to move into football, something he's spoken about on a number of occasions in the past.

Let's get real here.It is very unlikely that ANY professional player will ever say anything derogatory about a teammate that has just left the club.If Jack had said about Coq - «Grew up playing with him in the Youth Team and have fond memories of a player they though he had very limited ability he always gave his all.Very surprised and disappointed the club never invested in a World Class defensive midfielder that we have quite obviously been lacking for a number of seasons and would no doubt have improved the defensive weakness we have shown over a number of seasons» we would have echoed his thoughts entirely.If he had said about Theo - «A player who should have been so much better than he ended up being.He had everything needed to be a prolific player for our club but I can understand the fans frustrations with his continued lack - lustre performances and total lack of a football brain.I think this is best explained by the managers preference to play a player of such limited ability as Alex Iwobi in front of Theo pretty much says it all» we again would have all nodded our agreement.Although Jack never mentioned Alexis Sanchez I would imagine something along the lines of «If the Manager had not persisted with players with such limited ability such as Francis and Theo and instead bought the world class players needed into the club then Sanchez would still most likely be here.The fans must wonder what the hell goes on at the club as they pay fortunes for the privalage of following our club but it seems the millions generated ends up purchasing a new Texas Ranch for the Owner or in a yearly renumeration of # 9million pounds to our manager».

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

I have an obsession with discounting penalties from the count, firstly because the ridicule heaped on Giroud should be tempered with like - for - like numbers (perhaps we should add Cazorla's 7 penalties to his total to even things up) and secondly everyone bangs on about the «create something from nothing» centre forward so don't see why penalties count.

This is merely me being realistic about the unhealthy way top football is going, moneywise, and acknowledging the fact that sooner or later something will have to be done to change this, if fans are to accept keep coming in huge numbers.

But can someone tell me how we picked up more yellow cards than Stoke did last season, I'm not sure if they done over the full season or if they showed it over a fair number of games, I remember reading something about it a while back.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

Really happy about this, think this lad will be England's number 1 striker in the next 2 / 3 years he just seems to have something a bit special about him and for wenger to hand out the best ever contract for a lad this age goes to show what he thinks of him to!