In Darby v. Marley Cooling, the Maryland Court of
Special Appeals considered the question of whether an employee that prevailed before the Maryland Workers» Compensation Commission may file an «intent to participate» in a Circuit Court appeal and raise objection to the rest of the Commission's decision or whether the employee is required to file a cross appeal.
Not exact matches
The schedule of meetings of public bodies in Niagara Falls government this week: The Zoning Board of
Appeals will hold a
special meeting at 5:30 p.m. Monday in Council Chambers in City Hall, 745 Main St.. The board will
consider a request for a «use variance» that would allow the former Nabisco warehouse on Buffalo Avenue to reopen as a warehouse to store cardboard.
in the case of an unaccompanied youth, ensure that the local educational agency liaison assists in placement or enrollment decisions under this paragraph, including coordination with the committee on
special education for students with disabilities pursuant to section 200.4 of this Title,
considers the views of such unaccompanied youth, and provides notice to such youth of the right to
appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 11432 (g)(3)(E)(ii)(Public Law 107 - 110, title X, section 1032, 115 STAT.
«The marketplace for cats is ready for fresh ideas, and this
special partnership will help us take cat play to a new level with product solutions that
consider real cat behavior and
appeal to cats» senses and instincts.»
Over the last several years states have
considered creating within the judicial branch separate,
special courts to hear only tax cases or tax
appeals, such as proposals in Georgia (discussed here) and Louisiana (discussed here).
Washington State: Plan for
special Tax Division of the Court of
Appeals advances 4 - 3; second state to
consider Court of
Appeals judges to also sit as trial judges
The Court of
Appeal also did not
consider it to be helpful to add to the guidance contained in the House of Lords» judgments in Miller and Charman which they said «provide authoritative and clear guidance as to the circumstances and manner in which
special contribution is to be applied».
The Court of
Appeal concluded that the husband's proposed three part test would simply serve to «complicate the analysis required when
considering whether a party has made a
special contribution, and, at worst, would unfairly elevate a financial contribution above other forms of contribution».
With respect to effective dates other than regular effective dates, meaning retroactive or accelerated coverage effective dates resulting from enrollment under certain
special enrollment periods (including birth and marriage), resulting from the resolution of
appeals, or resulting from amounts newly due for prior coverage based on issuer corrections of under - billing, we
considered a premium payment deadline of 10 - 15 business days from when the issuer receives the enrollment transaction.
With respect to effective dates other than regular effective dates, meaning retroactive or accelerated coverage effective dates resulting from enrollment under certain
special enrollment periods (including birth and marriage), resulting from the resolution of
appeals, or resulting from amounts newly due for prior coverage based on issuer corrections of under - billing, we are
considering a premium payment deadline of 10 - 15 business days from when the issuer receives the enrollment transaction.
(c) an ability to make submissions which the Court might
consider that it «should have to assist it to reach a correct determination» [7];
special knowledge and expertise relevant to the issues the subject of the
appeals; and