Spiritual abuse doesn't exist in their vocabulary — only church discipline and Divine quality control.
First, Driscoll's so - called «fall» (from the Acts 29 p.o.v.) seems mainly to involve scandalous improprieties re: funds and books and tone and so on, but the theology that undergirds the spiritual abuse doesn't come under fire since Acts 29 not only doesn't see it as a problem, but generally holds to it as well.
Not exact matches
But as always I so so appreciate these posts... Thank you for all you
do to highlight
spiritual abuse.
@WIII — I don't think he refers to
spiritual abuse but to any kind of
abuse.
Don't name names or anything, but tell stories so that people in the pews can be alerted to the
spiritual abuse that happens in some churches, and so that
spiritual abusers can be put on notice that we aren't going to take it any more.
I have not read the book — my church is already living through enough
spiritual abuse on the part of its leaders that I really don't think I can stomach any more!
I didn't write about Commenders with this current situation in mind, but because I have generally been seeing an increased level of push - back against them from the
spiritual abuse survivor community over the past five years.
A friend of mine who teaches on the collegiate level recently told me, «I don't meet any young adults who've grown up in the church lacking at least one story of
spiritual abuse.»
ttm, Belittling the question or the questioner and trying to shut them up is a form of
spiritual abuse when it's
done in a religious context or for supposedly religious reasons by someone in a position of authority.
Because I take accusations of
spiritual abuse seriously (as, I'm sure,
do all the people named in Julie's email), in recent days I've gone back in my email archives and reread the many emails Julie sent or forwarded to me during and since 2008.
When you add the «
spiritual» layer to
abuse through the silencing and censoring
done by others — who are supposed to be your Christian brothers and sisters — it is overwhelmingly detrimental to any healing.
ReliStuPhD, yes I meant a thank you to brad / futuristguy for the research he's
doing and what he's writing about
spiritual abuse.
I am neither, but I
did marry a mentally ill person who has
abused his position as a chaplain and as a Pastor just as Danielle Shroyer, Brad Cecil, Doug Pagitt, Brian McLaren, Mike King and Mark Scandrette
did by aiding in this
spiritual abuse and diabolical behavior.
We're in a conversation about
spiritual abuse — the process by which people who have
spiritual authority (pastors, preachers, priests, etc.) take advantage of that authority to
do harm to those entrusted to their care.
I'm not a lawyer, but have had to
do some research on SLAPP / anti-SLAPP because threats of defamation lawsuits against those who speak out seem to arise regularly in situations that involve alleged
spiritual abuse.
The full record, as I have read it, actually shows that Tony has actually written against Driscoll's
spiritual abuses so many times that one might actually conclude Tony is an example of how the church
DOES SOMETIMES CONFRONT
ABUSE.
Because you «take accusations of
spiritual abuse seriously», in your review of prior emails,
did you not reconsider the attempt by the discernment team to have Julie committed to a mental institution to be potentially abusive?
I don't think this is being fair to the victims or the perpetrators of
spiritual abuse.
I offered, at that time, my opinion that if you take Tony's post about Driscoll in the context of all Tony has said about Pastor Mark, it's very clear that Tony
does not «reflect the refusal of the church to understand
spiritual abuse» as David observed.
I
do believe
spiritual abuse is rampant, that systems perpetually pull towards inhumane policies and treatment of people, and that all kinds of harmful ideas, attitudes and behaviours run rampant inside systems, including the church.
While there is a certain amount of authority inherent within the pastoral position, it is, like any other form of power, easy to
abuse, and while pastors are
spiritual leaders, this
does not make us immune to the lust for power, but to the contrary, often seems to amplify it.
well fishon, if i may, i would say that on a blog that is basically known for helping people who have experienced
spiritual abuse... it is best to be gentle, which you don't seem to be able to
do.
Paul, as a
spiritual father,
did not engage in
spiritual child
abuse.
And don't forget about the
Spiritual Abuse Awareness Week synchroblog.
Gregory's approach to pastoral care of the rich has exceptional subtlety, hinging importantly upon the biblical paradigms of Nathan before David and of David's care for Saul.34 When pastors come before the wealthy as
spiritual guides, they
do well to remember what Nathan
did in the case of the poor man whom the rich man had
abused.
She seeks to
do this through promoting truth - seeking expeditions, advocating gender equality, educating the Church on
abuse, and aiding the rescue of men, women and children from
spiritual, emotional and physical poverty.
How
do you recognise
spiritual abuse?
I address this topic with credentials for three reasons: I delivered
spiritual abuse as a pastor; I was a recipient of
spiritual abuse; and I care about the victims and
do what I can to help.
I
did nt want to believe in
spiritual abuse, but Im starting to
do some research on google.
He loved the legalist in me as He loved the rebel who, honestly, didn't want to rebel against God, but against a disease - causing religious system with its
spiritual abuse and against those who once
abused me sexually.
Actually, I
DID have a great deal of
spiritual oppression during the
abuse, and again years after it reappered in the same way.
I came across the Nakedpastor when I
did a search on Flickr for «
spiritual abuse».
She has also written about «10 Ways to Spot
Spiritual Abuse» and «What to
Do if You Are in a
Spiritual Abusive Situation.»
«10 Ways to Spot
Spiritual Abuse» and «What to
Do if You Are in a
Spiritual Abusive Situation» by Mary DeMuth
Forgiving a
spiritual abuser
does not mean you never speak of their
spiritual abuse.
When we humans were primitive thousands of years ago, we survived because nature provided us the basic conditions for life, that is called anthropic environment that until now sustained our existence, We as creatures never affect the environmental balance, but today because of many synthetic products our existence had endangered nature, that awareness developed a kind of concern for us to correct some of what we seemed us environmental
abuse, That is the phiysical or material aspect of reality, in the
spiritual part of our responsibility we also began to realize the meaninglessness of our existence without God, and for the atheists the reverse, Why
do you think is the reason?
The problem with
spiritual abuse it it's subtle (and quite frankly deceptive) nature, that many people don't even realise that it's going on.
Pope Francis has
done a considerable amount to fight child
abuse within the Church, and the Vatican has followed his lead: the L'Osservatore Romano recently published a serious and substantial review of Dawn Eden's book, My Peace I Give You, highlighting how the sacraments and saints can help heal the physical, emotional, and
spiritual trauma that sexual
abuse inflicts.
They
do so not because they reject Church teachings, nor because they are angry about the
abuse crisis or a difficult marriage issue, but because, research shows, their
spiritual needs are not met.
Well, I think it's because far too many Christians just don't know how to spot and respond to the signs of
abuse — be it
spiritual abuse,
abuse of authority, or even the physical / emotional / sexual
abuse of women and children.
But the damage
done by the
spiritual abuse can not be described.
The issue being identified is this: A pastor has engaged in emotional /
spiritual abuse within the context of a congregation and has actively
done harm to the wellbeing of individuals.
It's weird or its wrong or its the worst version of a
spiritual abuse or maybe it scares us because we just don't understand.