«NAPBS Accreditation for Background Screening Firms Will Reach Tipping Point and Become
Standard Criteria in 2015»
Not exact matches
We also have audited,
in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Neiman Marcus, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of July 28, 2012, based on
criteria established
in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 18, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
First, let's assume that you meet the highest
standards for all other
criteria in your loan application.
Members of the Committee are non-management directors who,
in the opinion of the Board, satisfy the independence
criteria established by the Board, the
standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the NYSE.
In any event, however, we will gradually transition toward standard «post-war» criteria as we move through 2010 - slower if we observe credit strains, but otherwise in a roughly linear way as we move through the yea
In any event, however, we will gradually transition toward
standard «post-war»
criteria as we move through 2010 - slower if we observe credit strains, but otherwise
in a roughly linear way as we move through the yea
in a roughly linear way as we move through the year.
Presently, if the Market Climate was to improve based on our
standard post-war
criteria, we would move 40 - 50 %
in the direction of that exposure.
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said banks relaxed the
criteria for businesses and consumers to obtain credit during the 18 months leading up to June 30, 2013, while the European Central Bank said fewer banks
in the euro zone were reporting tightened lending
standards to nonfinancial businesses
in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Turning to look at the small sub-prime market
in Australia, non-conforming housing loans are the closest equivalent to sub-prime loans
in the US, being provided to borrowers who do not satisfy the
standard lending
criteria of mainstream lenders such as those with impaired or incomplete credit histories.
'» Sadly, Catholic priests are suspended from their priestly ministry —
in effect, treated as guilty — on the basis of neither of these judicial
standards, but on the basis of the weakest possible
criterion, mere «credibility.»
Wouldn't those
standards include meaningfully involving the congregation
in decisions (or
criteria for decisions)
in how it should be spent?
It has been
standard practice
in adjudicating the psychopathological status of a behavioral syndrome to focus on four
criteria: statistical infrequency, distress, maladaptiveness, and violation of societal norms.
As the Lausanne Covenant asserts, the Bible is «without error
in all that it affirms» Although detailed inerrantists like John Montgomery and Harold Lindsell resist referring to the writer's intentions as a
criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a
standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences
in Biblical numbers [Num.
The real danger comes from a much larger group of persons who believe that Notre Dame can strive for ever - higher
standards of academic excellence — and use the same
criteria of excellence by which the best secular universities
in the land are judged to be excellent — without forfeiting the Catholic character of the University.
A major deficiency
in recognizing the spiritual component
in the field of addictions has been the lack of clearly defined
criteria, based on hard data, that measure up to social, psychological, and medical
standards.
Accordingly, human choice must decide not only «what is true but what
criteria shall be used to determine the truth, and what
standards shall be used
in choosing between competing
criteria, and what judgments shall be employed
in deciding on the
standards ad infinitum» (Van Cleve Morris, Philosophy and the American School).
I have treated the general issue of the «
criteria» or «
standards» for regarding something as an appropriate candidate for the attribution to it of the quality of divinity at greater length
in «Divinity and Dipolarity: Thomas Erskine and Charles Hartshorne on What Makes God «God»» Journal of Religion 62 (October 1982): 335 - 58.
In response to this overall assessment of the FWT's methodological motives and behavior, I first want to address Griffin's contention that FWTs display the tendency to utilize a double standard when discussing evil — that they don't allow their «Own positions to be judged with the same rigor, and in terms of the same criteria, as the other positions.&raqu
In response to this overall assessment of the FWT's methodological motives and behavior, I first want to address Griffin's contention that FWTs display the tendency to utilize a double
standard when discussing evil — that they don't allow their «Own positions to be judged with the same rigor, and
in terms of the same criteria, as the other positions.&raqu
in terms of the same
criteria, as the other positions.»
It does violence to the sources
in expunging sayings and deeds of Jesus that are attested to by what, according to the
standard criteria, must be regarded as early and reliable traditions.
Inconsistencies
in fact and point of view and the duplication of episodes are apparent even to the casual reader; and detailed analysis of the text is easily accessible
in any
standard Introduction to the Old Testament.1 We are skeptical of some of the common
criteria of literary priority, however; and we reject the view that the «later» sources (often late only editorially, not
in substance) are necessarily less accurate, less dependable.
To proclaim the
criteria by which the Coming King will judge persons and nations, to exemplify those
standards in the church as the new society, and to work for their recognition by the world — these are irreducible aspects of the Christian summons to the forgiveness of sins and new life, and to the lordship of the risen and returning King.
They are, therefore, to be judged not simply by
standards of truth
in the usual sense, but by much broader
criteria of qualitative worth.
We have seen
in an earlier chapter that
in our concern for rethinking, reconceiving, restating, we must be aware of and concerned with contemporary ideas; yet we are never to regard the patterns of thought (or what, following Professor Alexander, we styled the «ordinary knowledge» of our time), as if these gave us the last word, the final
criterion, the absolute
standard.
Carrefour published its Sourcing Policy on Sustainable Palm Oil
in 2014 which includes the RSPO
standard and additional
criteria such as protection of peat lands and high carbon stock areas.
Not only can you trust the organic claims of certified organic products, you can also be rest assured that they meet the ethical and fair trade
criteria in the
Standard.
Two theme examples provided by PIRSA
in their «Guidelines and Assessment
Criteria September 2016» document noted the example projects as «Achieving non-GM or organic
standard third - party certification to meet the requirements of an identified new or potential customer (s)» and «achieving non-GM or organic
standard third - party certification on products to distinguish optimum qualities from other similar competitors.
In this post, I'll disregard coffee purchased under Fair Trade (which does not have strong environmental
standards) and the 4C Code (see this post on Nestlé and deforestation for information on this bottom - rung system, which does not include environmental
criteria any of us would consider as being meaningfully «eco-friendly»).
I suspect that a farm meeting Rainforest Alliance's minimum environmental
standards would turn out to be using more sustainable growing methods than the typical Starbucks preferred supplier — although a lack of standardization among the
standards might make that assessment difficult (Rainforest Alliance uses 99
criteria in 10 principals, with percentage thresholds for certification).
Yet to justify lowering the shade requirements
in the next version of the
standard, RA says that farms are not fully implementing the
criterion and it has not been effective.
For the most concise before - and - after comparison of the changes
in the shade requirements for Rainforest Alliance certification, I provide below the
criteria for coffee from the 2005 SAN
standard.
Question is: if the conditions permit higher shade
in such places, what prevents the
standard /
criteria from saying so?
A history of previous versions of the shade
criteria in the SAN
standard can be read here.
Without
standard serving sizes, consumers» ability to compare nutrition
criteria between products with different serving sizes may be severely hindered, and there is a possibility that food manufacturers will manipulate serving sizes
in order to portray a food product as having a healthier nutrient profile.
Most producers will have to take steps to conform to the
criteria outlined
in the
standards of the certification they are seeking.
In 2005, the SAN
standard did have critical
criteria that required a conservation program that included establishment and maintenance of shade trees for traditional agroforestry crops.
Not only can you trust the organic claims of certified organic products, they also meet the ethical and fair trade
criteria in the Australian Certified Organic
Standard.
The 40 % shade level
criteria of the 2010 version of the SAN
Standard has proven to be a challenge
in many coffee producing regions, especially areas with heavy cloud cover, high rainfall and high humidity.
Further, if the proposed
criteria will permit the shade / tree requirements to be outside the production area as you mentioned, then there is less justification to reduce the amount of shade required for coffee
in the
standard.
Nespresso has divvied up and tweaked the 10 principals and 99
criteria in the 2010 SAN
standard into 42 principals and 296
criteria.
Palm oil produced
in compliance to stringent
criteria and
standard set by RSPO can then be offered as certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO).
Therefore it is with regret that I report that I feel the changes
in the new
standard regarding shade
criteria have negative effects and, due to lack of transparency, I can no longer recommend Rainforest Alliance certified coffee to consumers specifically seeking «shade grown» coffee.
For the most concise before - and - after comparison of the changes
in the shade requirements for Rainforest Alliance certification, I provide below the
criterion for coffee from the 2005 SAN
standard.
In other words, the dilution of RA
criteria brings them closer to other coffee certification programs with broader and / or weaker
standards.
The
standard calls for at least 12 native tree species per hectare for certified farms, so there are either certified farms
in this sample that are not meeting that
criteria, or there is error
in the farmer reporting.
Supported by industry leaders and prominent environmental conservation groups such as The Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the AWS
Standard is the first comprehensive global standard for measuring responsible water stewardship, not just in terms of environmental criteria, but also social and economic dim
Standard is the first comprehensive global
standard for measuring responsible water stewardship, not just in terms of environmental criteria, but also social and economic dim
standard for measuring responsible water stewardship, not just
in terms of environmental
criteria, but also social and economic dimensions.
Created by industry leaders and prominent environmental conservation groups such as The Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the AWS
Standard is the first comprehensive global standard for measuring responsible water stewardship, not just in terms of environmental criteria, but also social and economic dim
Standard is the first comprehensive global
standard for measuring responsible water stewardship, not just in terms of environmental criteria, but also social and economic dim
standard for measuring responsible water stewardship, not just
in terms of environmental
criteria, but also social and economic dimensions.
I've decided to put the most salient data together
in a table for four of the main coffee certifications with environmental
criteria, plus Starbucks CAFE
Standards (a third - party verified set of supplier
standards), with past data for reference.
In order to become certified, farms must meet
criteria of the Rainforest Alliance Sustainable Agriculture
Standard.
More than 60 % of foods that received the «Smart Choices» label did not meet
standard nutritional
criteria for a «healthy» food choice, suggesting that industries» involvement
in designing labelling systems should be scrutinized.
USDA will accredit organic certification agencies that comply with the National Certified Transitional Program
criteria, enabling those agencies to conduct certification of producers operating
in accordance with the OTA - developed
standards.
Criteria are required
in meeting the objective: nutrition education, physical activity, nutrition
standards, nutrition promotion, and other school based activities.