Sentences with phrase «standard issue questions»

Not exact matches

Here is where I have an issue and Shiller can take some of the heat for this; the viewer hears how expensive we are by historical standards and understandably so questions whether now is really a great time to be investing in «pricey» stocks.

Victor Lowe, who has written more about this issue than anyone else, insisted from the beginning that a very high standard of evidence ought to be adopted in investigating this question of historical influence.

Serino has faced questions from local political advocates when it comes to scaling back the state's controversial Common Core standards, an issue she ran heavily on.

The mayor largely shirked questions about the gubernatorial race, but did comment on what he believed to be important issues for New Yorkers, including economic fairness, «ensuring people have a decent standard of living» and other progressive - leaning ideas.

Second, it questions whether abstract standards can be action - guiding in the real world — given the multi-dimensionality of the issues it becomes unclear how any one sub-optimal choice can claim superiority over any other sub-optimal choice.

Joined by OEM Commissioner Joe Esposito de Blasio answered questions on the City's readiness to deal with ebola, whether his reaction to Rachel Noerdlinger's issues represents a «double standard» and changes in the levying of fines by the Department of Consumer Affairs.

He and his colleagues are part of a growing number of top - tier scientists who are applying the same rigorous standards they use on other scientific issues to tackle one of the biggest questions facing humanity: Are we alone in the universe?

Ben: Now before we talk a little bit about the gold standard for different tests that you would recommend for different issues, one more question about kind of the end of the tube.

A number of issues will require further discussion, including whether the vitamin E standard is appropriate; whether nuts should be placed in a separate food group; whether legumes should be left in both the Meat and Bean group and the Vegetable group; whether soft margarines should be classified as oils or moved to solid fats, in light of trans fat; whether calcium - fortified soy products should continue to be classified as legumes; and the question of water and whether it should be included in the pyramid revision.

, «Ideals, standards and Boundaries», «looking back to move forward», «separating your issues from your partners» and more and also goes on to offer helpful advice on personality types to avoid the not to be missed «The most important questions you will ever answer».

While the issue of whether or not it lives up to the lofty standards set by Planescape is a question I'm not qualified to answer, I can say without any hesitation that Numenera deserves your attention either way.

The Bishops who convened at the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore in 1884 determined to write a catechism for Catholic children — the famous Baltimore Catechism, which was a standard text in Catholic schools for the next 80 years, its questions and answers about the Church and God learned, by rote, by millions of children, in a fashion that might put Muslim madrassas to shame — and then issued what today would be considered a terribly draconian and medieval (parochial?)

On the question of sexual assault on campus, the Obama administration issued a «Dear Colleague» letter in 2011 alerting colleges and universities that they should use a «preponderance of evidence» standard — rather than the more stringent «beyond a reasonable doubt» standard — when adjudicating sexual assault cases.

By randomly asking respondents slightly different questions about the same issue, we were able to investigate whether adjustments to policies such as national standards, affirmative action, school vouchers, and tax credits could attract broader support.

While it is silent on the key question of «value added,» the board establishes an important set of precedents, namely that the «profession» - with some advice from thoughtful outsiders - can establish standards for itself and wrestle with some tough issues surrounding performance identification and documentation.

This question is explored in an article published in the May / June 2017 issue of the Journal of Teacher Education, an issue that also includes several other articles on the topic of the implications for teacher preparation of the Common Core and other new PK - 12 learning standards.

Studies that address general questions provide information that is useful for understanding the larger issues of systemic reform (e.g., restructuring, governance, standards, and assessment) and the contexts in which these reforms are implemented.

I also should note that researchers in this study clearly conducted this study with similar a priori conclusions in mind (i.e., that the Common Core should be saved / promoted); hence, future peer review of this piece may be out of the question as the bias evident in the sets of findings would certainly be a «methodological issue,» again, likely preventing a peer - reviewed publication (see, for example, the a priori conclusion that «[this] study highlights an important advantage of having a common set of standards and assessments across multiple states,» in the abstract (p. 3).

The question here is whether an understanding of the ideas of Britishness as outlined in the proposed new independent school standards would really resolve issues of social inclusion and equality in schools and the wider society.

His recent research and publication interests have focused on the relationship between English language proficiency and content assessments, standards alignment, policy issues associated with Title III accountability, and applying growth modeling techniques to address key educational questions for English language learners.

While they disagreed on some issues, such as the role of the federal government in setting national standards and ensuring compliance with federal regulations, their answers to the question, «Should school reform be a national priority — and if so, why?»

I also think we could do a lot better at figuring that out if we could have real discussions about the issue, including distinguishing what is actually «the standard» and what are related, but independent concepts (eg, curriculum, student / teacher paradigms) and more substantive questions like developmental appropriateness, aligning expectations to societal needs — and justifying those needs and that alignment — etc, etc....

It masks the substantial issues involved in generating meaningful credible actual test scores... whether students have sufficient actual instruction on common core standards prior to operational testing to permit valid test scores, or the fact that while Smarter Balanced may have generated enuf qualified test questions to deliver an actual full test spring 2015 [the so - called «field» test was not an actual test, but rather an exercise to try - out test questions for potential inclusion in an actual test], it still needs actual test scores from spring 2015 to generate credible scoring rules for the test (i.e., «cut scores») for valid reliable fair individual student and aggregate group scores.

Learn how to rephrase the performance objectives of college and career ready standards in history and social studies into into good questions that will challenge students to read, research, reflect upon, and respond to historical and social ideas, incidents, individuals, information, and issues.

It masks the substantial issues involved in generating meaningful credible actual test scores... whether students have sufficient actual instruction on common core standards prior to operational testing to permit valid test scores, or the fact that while Smarter Balanced may have generated enuf qualified test questions to deliver an actual full... Read More

Williams - Bishop also noted that questions and issues around the Common Core should have been raised by the governor before the state adopted the new standards and invested considerable «time, effort and taxpayer dollars.»

Retaining an explicit emphasis in the new standards on including «opportunities for students to study relationships among science, technology, and society» (Hicks et al., 2014, Table 1) would open the door to consideration of a set of issues that every future teacher ought to be thinking about, for example, the power relationships enacted online as manifest through sexism, racism, anti-Semitism, and homophobia; the quality of the discourse and information that circulates there and the effects of rumor on reputation; notions of public and private in a digital age; cyber bullying and suicide; copyright and plagiarism; ethics and professional responsibilities related to social media; and a host of other topics and questions that a critical media literacy approach could raise regarding technology and citizenship education.

To help educators become that trusted voice, ASCD's next issue of Policy Points, to be released in the coming weeks, dispels those aforementioned Common Core myths, addressing widespread questions about federal involvement and local control of schools as well as other misunderstandings related to the standards» relationship to curriculum, their cost to states, student privacy, and more.

In this issue of Educational Leadership, authors weigh in on the questions swirling around the standards and offer their ideas about how to implement them effectively.

Using language that evoked some of his fiercest critics, Mr. Duncan wrote in a blog post, «I believe testing issues today are sucking the oxygen out of the room in a lot of schools,» and he added that teachers needed time to adapt to new standards and tests that emphasize more than simply filling in bubbled answers to multiple - choice questions.

Both simplified issue and guaranteed issue life insurance types of coverage are more expensive than going through the standard underwriting process, which includes a medical exam, with guaranteed issue typically being more expensive than simplified issue since no health questions are required.

Being educated before you meet with your advisor will help you ask the right questions, address all the issues, and hold your advisor to higher standards.

, ArtPharmacy (Blog), June 12 Elisa della Barba, «What I loved about Venice Biennale 2013», Swide, June 2 Juliette Soulez, «Le Future Generation Art Prize remis a Venise», Blouin Artinfo, May 31 Charlotte Higgins, «Venice Biennale Diary: dancing strippers and inflatable targets», The Guardian On Culture Blog, May 31 Vincenzo Latronico, «Il Palazzo Enciclopedico», Art Agenda, May 31 Marcus Field, «The Venice Biennale preview: Let the art games commence», The Independent, May 18 Joost Vandebrug, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye», L'Uomo Vogue, No. 441, May / June «Lucy Mayes, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye», a Ruskin Magazine, Vol.3, pp. 38 - 39 Rebecca Jagoe, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye: Portraits Without a Subject», The Culture Trip, May Lynette Yiadom - Boakye, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye on Walter Richard Sickert's Miss Gwen Ffrangcon - Davies as Isabella of France (1932)», Tate etc., Issue 28, Summer, p. 83 «Turner Prize - nominated Brit has art at Utah museum», Standard Examiner, May 1 Matilda Battersby, «Imaginary portrait painter Lynette Yiadom - Boakye becomes first black woman shortlisted for Turner Prize 2013», The Independent, April 25 Nick Clark, «David Shrigley's fine line between art and fun nominated for Turner Prize», The Independent, April 25 Charlotte Higgins, «Turner prize 2013: a shortlist strong on wit and charm», guardian.co.uk April 25 Charlotte Higgins, «Turner prize 2013 shortlist takes a mischievous turn», guardian.co.uk, April 25 Adrian Searle, «Turner prize 2013 shortlist: Tino Sehgal dances to the fore», guardian.co.uk, April 25 Allan Kozinn, «Four Artists Named as Finalists for Britain's Turner Prize», The New York Times, April 25 Coline Milliard, «A Crop of Many Firsts: 2013 Turner Prize Shortlist Announced», Artinfo, April 25 Sam Phillips, «Former RA Schools student nominated for Turner Prize», RA Blog, April 25 «Turner Prize Shortlist 2013», artlyst, April 25 «Turner Prize Nominations Announced: David Shrigley, Tino Sehgal, Lynette Yiadom - Boakye and Laure Prouvost Up For Award», Huffpost Arts & Culture, April 25 Hannah Furness, «Turner Prize 2013: a dead dog, headless drummers and the first «live encounter» entry», Telegraph, April 25 Hannah Furness, «Turner Prize 2013: The public will question whether this is art, judge admits», Telegraph, April 25 Julia Halperin, «Turner Prize shortlist announced», The Art Newspaper, April 25 Brian Ferguson, «Turner Prize nomination for David Shrigley», Scotsman.com, April 25 «Former Falmouth University student shortlisted for Turner Prize», The Cornishman, April 29 «Trickfilme und der Geschmack der Sonne», Spiegel Online, April 25 Dominique Poiret, «La Francaise Laure Prouvost en lice pour le Turner Prize», Liberation, April 26 Louise Jury, «Turner Prize: black humour artist David Shrigley is finally taken seriously by judges», London Evening Standard, April 25 «Turner Prize 2013: See nominees» work including dead dog, grave shopping list and even some paintings», Mirror, April 25 Henry Muttisse, «It's the Turner demise», The Sun, April 25 «Imaginary portrait painter up for Turner Prize», BBC News, April 25 Farah Nayeri, «Tate's Crowd Artist Sehgal Shortlisted for Turner Prize», Bloomberg Businessweek, April 25 «Turner Prize finalists mix humour and whimsy», CBC News, April 25 Richard Moss, «Turner Prize 2013 shortlist revealed for Derry - Londonderry», Culture24, April 25 «David Shrigley makes 2013 Turner Prize shortlist», Design Week, April 25 «The Future Generation Art Prize@Venice 2013», e-flux.com, April 21 Skye Sherwin, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye», The Guardian Guide, March 2 - 8, p. 36 Amie Tullius, «Seasoned by Whitney Tassie», 15 Bytes, March «ARTINFO UK's Top 3 Exhibitions Opening This Week, ARTINFO.com, February 25 Orlando Reade, «Whose Oyster Is This World?»

The Building Codes Division issued a Statewide Code Interpretation in 2011 to the question «Does the Passive House Standard meet the intent of the Reach Code?»

To give voters a better understanding of where the 2016 field stands on energy policy, AEA asked the candidates questions on a variety of issues, including EPA's carbon rule, a carbon tax, energy production on federal lands, and the Renewable Fuel Standard.

These are very elementary issues and the «scientists» in question have a responsibility for dealing with them in a professional standard regardless of whether I choose to interest myself in these issues or not.

There is a question (to be sorted out some way) over whether these new permits can be issued at all in areas that do not have EPA established air quality standards.

The Court of Appeal noted that the question at issue was statutory interpretation, which is a question of law and attracts a standard of correctness on review.

However, the «reasonableness standard» is to be applied to decisions which involve questions of fact, discretion and policy, as well as questions where the legal issues can not be easily separated from the factual ones.

The Supreme Court of Canada has been feverishly productive in the field of administrative law since the Fall of 2011, rendering decisions on standard of review (questions of law, jurisdictional error and labour arbitrators), the right to reasons, issue estoppel, attempts to pre-empt the administrative decision - making process, and review of municipal by - laws.

And reasonableness is the applicable standard of review here ̶ the questions of law at issue are of «a very technical nature» which the CITT will often be better equipped than a reviewing court to answer.

This differs from Combined Air, in which the Court of Appeal observed the question of whether there was a genuine issue requiring trial is a legal question, subject to appellate review at the lower standard of correctness.

The tragedy has highlighted the divisions in society and raised many questions including issues as to: access to justice and legal funding, as the tenants were unable to obtain legal aid for advice due to the legal aid cuts; the legal protection of tenants both in private and social housing; the inability of council tenants to enforce or seek to have enforced basic fitness standards under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System and Housing Act 2004 (HHSRSA), and the purchase of housing stock by local authorities.

Accordingly, the tribunal in this case should have asked itself two questions when deciding the issue of dishonesty: first, whether the first appellant had acted dishonestly by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people; and, second, whether he had been aware that by those standards he was acting dishonestly.

Bzdera set the basic frame twenty years ago when he described the anonymous unanimous judgment as a standard high court device for constitutional questions on federalism issues — but the citations that accompany this bold claim bear on the «unanimous» rather than the «anonymous» aspect.

The court decided to review Issues 2, 3, 5 and 6 on a «deferential standard of reasonableness,» but applied correctness to Issues 1 and 4: «While I acknowledge that in the administrative law context a tribunal may develop its own procedures as to admissibility without the recognized strictures found in the judicial rules of evidence, whereas issues # 1 and # 4 principally involve specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correcIssues 2, 3, 5 and 6 on a «deferential standard of reasonableness,» but applied correctness to Issues 1 and 4: «While I acknowledge that in the administrative law context a tribunal may develop its own procedures as to admissibility without the recognized strictures found in the judicial rules of evidence, whereas issues # 1 and # 4 principally involve specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correcIssues 1 and 4: «While I acknowledge that in the administrative law context a tribunal may develop its own procedures as to admissibility without the recognized strictures found in the judicial rules of evidence, whereas issues # 1 and # 4 principally involve specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correcissues # 1 and # 4 principally involve specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correcissues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correctness.

If you suspect that your medical provider did not follow standard procedure and you were injured as a result, it may be helpful to contact a personal injury attorney to delve deeper into the question of whether or not it is an issue of medical malpractice.

In determining the appropriate standard of review, Justices LeBel and Cromwell relied on the tribunal's expertise, the factual nature of the question, and the purpose of the statutory provisions at issue.

A labour arbitrator said that it was, but the Court (unanimous on this point) easily rejected that view, again without addressing either the question of the standard of review or the administrative decision - maker's reasoning (though the majority did discuss it at length on the other issue in the case, which concerned the interpretation of a collective agreement).

The Court also confirmed that a question of law is engaged whenever the issue is whether an arrest is reasonable, and the question was reviewable on a standard of correctness, citing R. v. Storrey.90