Sentences with phrase «state family planning funding»

Those measures included large cuts to state family planning funding progr...

Similarly, the number of attacks on state family planning funding was down sharply, and only two states disqualified family planning providers from funding in 2012, compared with seven in 2011.

These changes bring to nine the number of states that restrict access to family planning funds (see State Family Planning Funding Restrictions).

For a chart of current laws and policies in each state, see State Family Planning Funding Restrictions.

States that restrict or bar the allocation of state family planning funds to certain types of family planning or abortion providers

For example, the Missouri legislature eliminated the state's entire family planning program in 2003 after earlier attempts to prevent organizations that provide or refer for abortion services from receiving state family planning funds were repeatedly struck down by the courts.

Not exact matches

Pro-life members of Congress outmaneuvered President Clinton for one of the rare occasions during his seven years in the White House, and only a small percentage of United States funds for international family planning will go to abortion advocacy organizations as a result.

President Donald Trump signed legislation Thursday that once again enables states to withhold federal family planning funds from Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers.

Amalgamated Transit Union, ATU Local 726, ATU Local 1056, ATU Local 1179 ATU Local 1181 - 1061, American Council of Engineering Companies of New York Asian Americans for Equality, Center for Working Families, Citizens Committee for NYC, Common Cause / NY, Construction Industry Council, CUNY Institute for Urban Systems, DC 37, DC 37 Local 375B, DC37 Local 1655, Empire State Transportation Alliance, Environmental Defense Fund, General Contractors Association of New York, League of Women Voters of the City of NY, League of Women Voters of New York State, Long Island Contractors» Association, Inc. (LICA), MTA Coalition of Unions, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, New York Building Congress, NY League of Conservation Voters, NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign, NYS Council of Machinists, NY State Legislative Conference Board, NYS Transportation Equity Alliance, PCAC to MTA, Pratt Center for Community Development, Regional Plan Association, Reinvent Albany, Teamsters Local 808, Transit Riders Action Committee, Transportation Alternatives, TWU Local 100, TWU Local 252, TWU Local2001, TWU Local 2054, Transport Workers International Union of America, Tri-State Transportation Campaign, UPROSE, We Act for Environmental Justice, Women's City Club.

Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker is proposing a fund in his state budget plan to prevent low - income families from becoming homeless.

While Zimpher praised the five - year plan as providing a predictable increase in funding, Frederick Kowal of United University Professions, the union that represents SUNY professors and other employees, said that state support has gone down over the long term, placing more of a burden on students and their families.

Money from the fund supports some of the state's most important safety net programs --» the State's Medicaid program, Family Health Plus, workforce recruitment and retention, the Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC) program, Child Health Plus (CHP), Graduate Medical Education, AIDS programs, disproportionate share payments to hospitals and other various public health initiatives,» according to the state's financial state's most important safety net programs --» the State's Medicaid program, Family Health Plus, workforce recruitment and retention, the Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC) program, Child Health Plus (CHP), Graduate Medical Education, AIDS programs, disproportionate share payments to hospitals and other various public health initiatives,» according to the state's financial State's Medicaid program, Family Health Plus, workforce recruitment and retention, the Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC) program, Child Health Plus (CHP), Graduate Medical Education, AIDS programs, disproportionate share payments to hospitals and other various public health initiatives,» according to the state's financial state's financial plan.

Cuomo also touted heavily in his 2016 speech - and ultimately got approval for - a plan to offer paid family leave that workers themselves would fund - not employers or the state - through voluntary payroll deductions.

The tuition plan costs $ 163 million a year and provides funds for students whose families earn less than $ 125,000 a year once all federal and additional state aid is exhausted.

List of Supporting Organizations: • African Services Committee • Albany County Central Federation of Labor • Alliance for Positive Change • ATLI - Action Together Long Island • Brooklyn Kindergarten Society • NY Immigration Coalition • Catholic Charities • Catholic Charities Brooklyn and Queens • Catholic Charities of Buffalo • Catholic Charities of Chemung / Schuyler • Catholic Charities of Diocese of Albany • Catholic Charities of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse • CDRC • Center for Independence of the Disabled NY • Children Defense Fund • Chinese - American Planning Council, Inc. • Citizen Action of New York • Coalition for the Homeless • Coalition on the Continuum of Care • Community Food Advocates • Community Health Net • Community Healthcare Network • Community Resource Exchange (CRE) • Day Care Council of New York • Dewitt Reformed Church • Early Care & Learning Council • East Harlem Block Nursery, Inc. • Family Reading Partnership of Chemung Valley • Fiscal Policy Institute • Food & Water Watch • Forestdale, Inc. • FPWA • GOSO • GRAHAM WINDHAM • Greater New York Labor Religion Coalition • HCCI • Heights and Hills • Housing and Services, Inc. • Jacob A. Riis Neighborhood Settlement • Jewish Family Service • Labor - Religion Coalition of NYS • Latino Commission on AIDS • LEHSRC • Make the Road New York • MercyFirst • Met Council • Metro New York Health Care for All • Mohawk Valley CAA • NAMI • New York Association on Independent Living • New York Democratic County Committee • New York State Community Action Association • New York State Network for Youth Success • New York StateWide Senior Action Council • NYSCAA • Park Avenue Christian Church (DoC) / UCC • Partnership with Children • Met Council • Professional Staff Congress • PSC / CUNY AFT Local 2334 • ROCitizen • Schenectady Community Action Program, Inc. • SCO Family of Services • SICM — Schenectady Community Ministries • Sunnyside Community Services • Supportive Housing Network of New York, Inc • The Alliance for Positive Change • The Children's Village • The Door — A Center of Alternatives • The Radical Age Movement • UJA - Federation of New York • United Neighborhood Houses • University Settlement • Urban Pathways, Inc • Women's Center for Education & Career Advancement

The fact is, 100,000 people who provide support, guidance, and quality care to about 130,000 individuals with developmental disabilities in New York state are left out of Cuomo's campaign of «raising opportunity for workers and their families,» because, as it stands, the governor's plan doesn't include the necessary funding for nonprofits to support it, jeopardizing their staff, services and programs.

Disapprove HHS Planned Parenthood Funding Rule — Vote Passed (230 - 188, 12 Not Voting) The resolution would disapprove the rule issued by the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) on Dec. 19, 2016, that modifies eligibility requirements for Title X grants for family planning services to specify that states awarding funds can not prohibit a health care provider from participating for reasons other than its ability to provide Title X services.

With support from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the three - year project will empower developing counties to advocate for universal access to reproductive health as a critical component in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in health through increased funding, an improved policy environment and increased visibility for family planning at the local, national and global levels.

The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and support • Early identification of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal

Proponents of a measure that would provide poor families in Arizona with state - funded vouchers for private school tuition hope to coax enough support from lawmakers this week to encourage Gov. Fife Symington to call a special legislative session to act on the plan.

Thanks to the state's archaic and religiously - bigoted Blaine Amendment, families would not be able to use school funding to put their children to high - quality private and parochial schools; although disappointing, it is understandable that Snyder won't go further given the opposition to the plan that is already emerging from affiliates of the National Education Association and American Federation of Teachers, and traditional districts.

Your editor has no particular problem with such a plan so long as it also includes requiring states to allow the rest of school funding to follow children to any schools their families choose.

Instead of closing schools, Seattle Public Schools needs a plan for delivering the kind quality education that will woo families back to the public schools along with per - pupil state funding.

In addition, districts have to respond in writing about how families» input helps shape the district - wide plan, which accounts for how state funds will be spent to support its goals, programs and services, and ultimately, student success.

While American moms won't soon enjoy the year of paid leave that a number of other wealthy nations offer, President Obama's budget proposal did include a $ 50 million State Paid Leave Fund, which would provide competitive planning grants to states to design and implement new paid family - leave insurance programs.

Rabinowitz questioned whether the embattled charter organization, also known as Family Urban Schools of Excellence, should continue running Dunbar School under a year - old arrangement through the state Commissioner's Network, a reform initiative that gives millions in extra funding to struggling schools that implement a three - to 5 - year «turnaround» plan.

A passel of interlinked right - wing groups that fund and participate in ALEC, including the Koch's astroturf group, Americans for Prosperity, the DeVos family's American Federation for Children, and the State Policy Network's Goldwater Institute joined the push to expand the state's voucher program (even though its small scale voucher plan was not popular with parents and not yet fState Policy Network's Goldwater Institute joined the push to expand the state's voucher program (even though its small scale voucher plan was not popular with parents and not yet fstate's voucher program (even though its small scale voucher plan was not popular with parents and not yet full.)

Transition planning from early childhood programs to elementary schools is addressed in various sections of ESSA within Title I Part A. Title I funding flows from states to public school districts with high numbers or percentages of low - income families.

An education savings plan, sponsored by a state or institution, designed to help families set aside funds for future college costs.

If you do plan to use a gift for your down payment, the donor must be an immediate family member, must provide copies of bank statements confirming the donor has the capacity to gift the funds, and must sign a letter that states the money is a gift, not a loan.

A 529 Plan is an education savings plan operated by a state or educational institution designed to help families set aside funds for futPlan is an education savings plan operated by a state or educational institution designed to help families set aside funds for futplan operated by a state or educational institution designed to help families set aside funds for future.

Program Consultant Developed and implemented healthcare manuals for Federal and State funded programs; Family Planning (Title X, XX, V), HIV / Aids, STD, for network of healthcare providers.

President Trump took another swipe at Obama - era policies, signing legislation that would allow states to deny federal family planning funds to Planned Parenthood, as... Read More

The Sustainability plan recommends that a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) be developed between the 3 state agencies to formalize the administration of Early Learning services foryoung children and families into the future to avoid going back into siloed funding, planning and decision making.

Despite recent polling showing that 78 percent of New Jersey voters support state funding for family planning services, members of the state legislature put politics over women's lives and failed to restore funding for the lifesaving reproductive health services New Jerseyans rely on.

Late last week, President Trump reversed an Obama - era regulation that prohibited states from withholding Title X family planning funds from reproductive health care providers,... Read More

Just weeks after signing legislation to restore funding for preventive family planning services, Governor Murphy reaffirmed his commitment to women's health by pledging to fund reproductive health services in the upcoming FY19 state budget.

In order to stay open and serving their communities, these health centers rely on various public funding streams, including the Title X national family planning program, Medicaid, and other federal and state funds.

«Asking FQHCs to become the main source of publicly funded family planning care in the United States is not a viable policy proposal,» says Hasstedt.

State policymakers have been pursuing this goal for years, and socially conservative members of Congress may well carry their current rhetoric through to the illogical conclusion that Title X funds should go only to entities offering primary care, excluding the very providers often best able to provide high - quality family planning and related services to large numbers of people.

However, even as the number of Texas women needing to rely on the state's publicly funded family planning effort has increased, the program's capacity has decreased.

Medicaid, the Title X national family planning program, and state and local funds all help provide affordable contraceptive care to women who need it.

One example is its County Fatherhood Initiative, which offers resources to county leadership in the state, such as training for conducting needs and asset assessments, planning for fatherhood summits, assistance for implementing community action plans, and grant money to begin or continue fatherhood programs in the community.25 Additionally, the OCF provides funding for organizations to host father - child events during Responsible Fatherhood Month in June, and hosts an annual Fatherhood Summit each year to more than 300 fatherhood and family - service practitioners, county and state agency staff, and community members.26

6 states have a priority system for the distribution of family planning funds — including federal funds distributed by a state agency — that disadvantages family planning centers or agencies associated with the provision of abortion services.

As a result, since January 2013, Texas has operated this family planning program as an entirely state - funded, state - run effort — no longer part of Medicaid — that excludes many of the very safety - net providers most able to provide high - quality contraceptive care to large numbers of women.

This tactic, which has been replicated in many states, prompted the Obama administration to issue regulations that clarified states can not exclude otherwise qualified abortion providers from the Title X program (see «Recent Funding Restrictions on the U.S. Family Planning Safety Net May Foreshadow What Is to Come,» 2016).

This concerted effort seeks to exclude Planned Parenthood health centers from state and federal funding streams, including the Title X national family planning program and Medicaid, and carries the potential to deprive women of the contraceptive services and counseling, STI testing and treatment, and breast and cervical cancer screenings that Planned Parenthood provides.

In 2010, New Jersey eliminated all state funding, $ 7.5 million a year, for family planning.

In 2011, seven states (Kansas, Wisconsin, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Tennessee, Indiana and Texas) moved to enact new restrictions on eligibility for family planning grant funds, often including both state funds and federal funds that flowed from the state treasury to providers (See Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2011 State Policy Revstate funds and federal funds that flowed from the state treasury to providers (See Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2011 State Policy Revstate treasury to providers (See Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2011 State Policy RevState Policy Review).

Similarly, fewer states moved to disqualify certain family planning providers from eligibility for funding than in 2011.