«As I travel around the country the number one complaint I hear from teachers is that
state bubble tests pressure teachers to teach to a test that doesn't measure what really matters,» said Duncan.
Not exact matches
The project's co-spokesman, Paul Huffman of North Carolina
State University in Raleigh, says that trial runs on a
test apparatus ran into problems when
bubbles began to form on its electrodes.
Yes the
tests are harder, but the
state's old assessments were not accurately depicting achievement expectations and were just multiple choice
bubble tests.
Parents worried that the drive to increase performance on
state tests came at the cost of an ever - narrowing curriculum and that the focus on getting the «
bubble kids» from slightly below proficient to slightly above proficient came at the cost of teaching kids who were way behind or ahead.
These and other distinctions mean that assessments that truly measure the Common Core will likely look different from current
state tests, necessary as we move from fill - in - the -
bubble tests toward more engaging assessments that better mirror good instruction in the classroom.
But those who deride «
bubble tests» can't have it both ways, as
states generally can't buy higher quality
tests at a lower price.
Most
states, however, opted to
test themselves on what could be
bubbled in.
Parents and teachers complained — with some legitimacy — that the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) era set loose an avalanche of weak fill - in - the -
bubble tests to assess student mastery of watered - down
state academic standards.
«We are closing the shameful achievement gap faster than ever,» the mayor said again in 2009, as city reading scores — now acknowledged as the height of a
test score
bubble — showed nearly 70 percent of children had met
state standards.
In an effort to provide ongoing feedback to teachers during the course of the school year, measure annual student growth, and move beyond narrowly - focused
bubble tests, the U.S. Department of Education has awarded two groups of
states grants to develop a new generation of
tests.
My commentary in Education Week explains why this issue is critical to determining whether the two consortia of
states working to develop new assessments can fulfill their promise to move beyond «
bubble»
testing.
States should adopt and continuously improve rigorous learning standards — in both reading and math — and should require not fill - in - the -
bubble tests, but rather aligned, high - quality
tests that measure higher - order thinking skills.
The Dept. of Education announced a new competitive grant that is compatible with ESSA for
states that want to «ditch fill - in - the -
bubble tests» with modern, «competency - based
tests.»
Even the most technologically advanced
states have done little except replace the conventional paper - based, multiple - choice, fill - in - the -
bubble tests with computerized versions of the same.
For the first time, many teachers will have the
state assessments they have longed for —
tests of critical thinking skills and complex student learning that are not just fill - in - the -
bubble tests of basic skills but support good teaching in the classroom.
We used results from an online practice
test to identify «
bubble kids» who were close to proficient on the
state assessment, as well as specific standards to reinforce in our instruction.
«One - shot, year - end
bubble tests administered on a single day, too often lead to a dummying down of curriculum,» Duncan said of the old
state tests.
Mulgrew
stated that both
State Education Commissioner John King and Chancellor Dennis Walcott told him they were against standardized
testing for pre K to grade 2 but Mulgrew went on to say that 36 schools were giving
bubble tests to kids of this age and that he talked to a teacher who reported that some of these students could not even hold a pencil.
That is why many people across the political spectrum support the work of 44
states to replace multiple choice «
bubble»
tests with a new
test that helps inform and improve instruction by accurately measuring what children know across the full range of college and career - ready standards, and measures other skills, such as critical - thinking abilities.
If you have been a teacher you understand that and that is why we do not like the idea of so much riding on a
state - developed - fill - in - the -
bubble test.
At the same time, the new
tests have generated hope among advocates that the low - quality, fill - in - the -
bubble tests that
states currently use, and the added assessments that districts require to compensate for them, will finally become a thing of the past.
«The Sound of
Bubbles Bursting: Student Gains on
State Test Vanished into Thin Air,» New York Daily News, August 1, 2010.
MCAS's
stated intention was to rethink how to measure and report on students» progress, yet MCAS relies on a high - stakes, fill - in - the -
bubble test and discourages alternative assessments.
The schools had been using old multiple - choice
bubble tests, similar to the old models of Wisconsin's
state assessment.
Three times a year, I spent the six weeks preceding our
state accountability
test pulling specific «
bubble» kids from electives and tutoring them in areas that had proved problematic on prior
tests.