Our team will provide you with the tools, guidance and resources you'll need to ensure your charter application is ready for submission to New York
State charter authorizers.
State charter authorizers have the power to overrule district decisions to deny charter proposals.
Here's a map from the new NACSA @qualitycharters report on
state charter authorizers showing how many authorizers each state has.
They appear to stand in opposition to much of the current reform agenda in Nashville (
state charter authorizer, vouchers, etc.).
This year,
the state charter authorizer board approved no new applications, most notably Ohio's I Can Schools, whose middling results in student achievement in Ohio and Indiana culminated in the state's Charter School Authorizer Board's decision to reject its application to establish three K - 8 schools in Mississippi.
When local officials in Chicago tried to close three failing charters,
the state charter authorizer, which was envisioned and funded by the Walton Family Foundation, stepped in and stopped the city from closing the schools.
Not exact matches
On the prekindergarten issue, Success argues that the city's demand that it sign the contract violates
state law, which it says gives a
charter school's
authorizer, not the city, oversight of its prekindergarten programs.
Charters will now be able to switch authorizers between the state Board of Regents and the SUNY Charter Schools Institute; SUNY is particularly friendly to charters and considered the authorizer of choice for charter n
Charters will now be able to switch
authorizers between the
state Board of Regents and the SUNY
Charter Schools Institute; SUNY is particularly friendly to charters and considered the authorizer of choice for charter ne
Charter Schools Institute; SUNY is particularly friendly to
charters and considered the authorizer of choice for charter n
charters and considered the
authorizer of choice for
charter ne
charter networks.
Technically, the
authorizers in this case are the
State University of New York trustees, who recognize the value of locking in renewals now and asked the Regents to OK them: Doing so will give the schools, Bronx Better Learning and eight Success Academy
charters, certainty about their futures, particularly as they consider expansions.
The city said that the contract was necessary to ensure consistent quality across prekindergarten programs, while Success said that the contract violated
state law, which it argued gave a
charter school's
authorizer the sole right to oversee the school's operations.
Sobered and a bit battered, Fordham continues as an
authorizer of Ohio
charter schools — six of them today, with a seventh in the offing — and a vigorous participant in the
state's larger education - policy debates.
A third organization, the National Association of
Charter School
Authorizers (NACSA), gives low marks to the laws of all four
states.
(Arizona has since required that
authorizers submit annual reports to the
state's auditor general, earning it additional points from NACSA, but the change is too recent to have influenced its
charter sector's results yet.)
Local school districts are the primary
authorizer for most
charters, but
charter schools can also be approved by their county or the
state board of education if rejected by their district.
Third, because of current federal and
state law, the SEA must be involved in many activities, whereas independent
charter authorizers and entities like Louisiana's RSD make the urban district expendable.
The demographic and political characteristics of a
state and character of the
state law authorizing
charter schools undoubtedly matter in some way for the fate of
charter schools in a
state, but most decisions about
charter school formation and attendance are made within school districts — by founders who decide to start a new school, by
authorizers who empower them to do so, and, ultimately, by parents who decide to enroll their students.
Joey Gustafson wrote about the
state of
charter authorizing in «Charter Authorizers Face Challenges: Quality Control Takes Money and Staff,» in the Summer 2013 issue of E
charter authorizing in «
Charter Authorizers Face Challenges: Quality Control Takes Money and Staff,» in the Summer 2013 issue of E
Charter Authorizers Face Challenges: Quality Control Takes Money and Staff,» in the Summer 2013 issue of Ed Next.
The NACSA report on
state policies associated with
charter school accountability attempts to describe how laws, regulations, and
authorizer practices interact to influence
charter quality.
State law allows charter authorizers to retain 3 percent of the state funding for the schools they sponsor, creating a strong disincentive for closing sch
State law allows
charter authorizers to retain 3 percent of the
state funding for the schools they sponsor, creating a strong disincentive for closing sch
state funding for the schools they sponsor, creating a strong disincentive for closing schools.
It is not
charter school
authorizers, who are only responsible for ensuring that the schools they sponsor comply with the
state's
charter - school law.
It is not the
state, which defers oversight to local education agencies and
charter authorizers.
Institutional players — teachers unions, school boards, and
state and district administrators — frequently petition
state leaders for
charter caps and reduced
charter funding and vigorously oppose alternative
authorizers and facilities aid.
The New York
State Board of Regents this week refused to approve early renewals recommended by their
authorizer for ten Success Academy
charter schools.
Twenty groups hoping to run new
charter schools submitted 43 applications to a review committee, comprising a team from the National Association of Charter School Authorizers and local, state, and national represent
charter schools submitted 43 applications to a review committee, comprising a team from the National Association of
Charter School Authorizers and local, state, and national represent
Charter School
Authorizers and local,
state, and national representatives.
In the place of the closed schools, assuming the
state authorizer assents, will be nine new public
charter schools.
While the ASD and other
authorizers like Nevada's
State Public
Charter Schools Authority create contracts with clear performance expectations, the ESA program provides no apparent standards for judging whether public funds are buying strong outcomes.
Because without the pressure of
state accountability and NCLB, precious few
authorizers have been willing to pull the trigger on underperforming
charters.
Charter laws vary from
state to
state, but typically,
authorizers award school
charters to a governing board, not to a school's founders or managers.
Several other
states are fortunate to have conscientious
authorizers that make up for their mediocre
charter policies.
Fordham is a
charter authorizer itself (in our home
state of Ohio) and we're keenly aware of the need to balance the risk that a new school may struggle academically against a
charter's right to autonomy and innovation.
they point out that in some
states,
authorizers operate virtually unchecked, with dire consequences for students, and that the National Alliance for Public
Charter Schools approves the quality controls of only two
states (Hawaii and Louisiana) and the District of Columbia.
I'm not sure I can prove it with hard data, but it sure seems clear to me that the cities and
states with some of the highest - performing
charter schools (Boston, Washington, D.C., New York
State, Tennessee) are also home to some of the most thoughtful and effective
authorizers.
The Arizona
State Board for Charter Schools, which serves as the authorizer for more than 90 percent of charter schools in the state, has already taken important steps in this direc
State Board for
Charter Schools, which serves as the authorizer for more than 90 percent of charter schools in the state, has already taken important steps in this dir
Charter Schools, which serves as the
authorizer for more than 90 percent of
charter schools in the state, has already taken important steps in this dir
charter schools in the
state, has already taken important steps in this direc
state, has already taken important steps in this direction.
The
charter sector has the advantage of its programs being tuition - free but is limited to operating in specific places where
charters have been approved by a
state - determined
authorizer.
(It bears noting that
charter schools are not on this list — indeed,
charter schools remain locked into existing accountability pressures and arguably these pressures are even more acute in some
states where poor performance can lead
authorizers to not renew a
charter.)
Every public
charter school has an
authorizer which, subject to
state law, may be a district school board, university, Mayor's office, or non-profit organization.
This special report, funded by the USDOE National Initiatives Grant of the
Charter Schools Program and administered by the National Association of State Directors of Special Education, is a supplement to a series of special education primers, Primers on Special Education in Charter Schools, created to inform state officials, authorizers and charter school operators about special education in the charter
Charter Schools Program and administered by the National Association of
State Directors of Special Education, is a supplement to a series of special education primers, Primers on Special Education in Charter Schools, created to inform state officials, authorizers and charter school operators about special education in the charter se
State Directors of Special Education, is a supplement to a series of special education primers, Primers on Special Education in
Charter Schools, created to inform state officials, authorizers and charter school operators about special education in the charter
Charter Schools, created to inform
state officials, authorizers and charter school operators about special education in the charter se
state officials,
authorizers and
charter school operators about special education in the charter
charter school operators about special education in the
charter charter sector.
Ms. Boast contributed to the National Association of
Charter School
Authorizer's Core Performance Framework and Guidance and has worked directly with
authorizers in over 14
states on performance monitoring and accountability.
Prior to her tenure with BASIS, she served as Executive Director of the Arizona
State Board for
Charter Schools, the nation's largest charter school auth
Charter Schools, the nation's largest
charter school auth
charter school
authorizer.
Prior to joining BASIS Schools, Inc. as Executive Director, she served as Executive Director of the Arizona
State Board for
Charter Schools, the nation's largest charter school auth
Charter Schools, the nation's largest
charter school auth
charter school
authorizer.
The National Alliance's
charter school model law is a template for
states to write laws that encourage the creation and growth of high - quality
charter schools while holding underperforming schools and
authorizers accountable.
The boilerplate contract provisions, which are required by most
charter authorizers, have been developed over the past 20 years by the district as a way to ensure that
charter petitioners conform to both
state and federal education codes, while providing a measure of transparency to stakeholders.
In the 2013 - 2015
state budget, money for districts will be tight again, creating a new round of challenges, which D'Andrea says will probably include merit pay, a teacher effectiveness program, the expansion of school choice, and maybe the creation of a statewide
charter authorizer.
City and
state leaders can accomplish this by ensuring that
charter authorizers are paying attention to recruitment and admission practices, by ensuring that schools are getting their fair share of funding, by giving
charter schools access to excellent special - education expertise and networks, and by promoting innovative new approaches through grants and
charter — district partnerships.
This report indicates that some organizations are turning on brighter lights — and raising the bar for
states, districts, and
charter authorizers that aren't yet measuring and reporting what matters to the public and families making decisions for their children.
When it comes to
charter schools, the Secretary acknowledged that
authorizers play a role alongside parents, though she picked the dubious case of Michigan, her home
state, to illustrate the point.
Some
authorizers do great work (e.g. the District of Columbia's Public
Charter School Board, the Massachusetts Department of Education and the
State University of New York) but too many others display mixed motives, are influenced by perverse incentives, and lack judgment, courage, or expertise.
The rating systems inventoried included some from
state departments of education, large public school districts,
charter associations and
authorizers, and private news and advocacy organizations.
A 2017 Thomas B. Fordham Institute report analyzed 639
charter applications that were submitted to 30
authorizers across four
states, providing a glimpse of the tea leaves that
charter authorizers read to determine whether or not a school should open.
The central problem with making growth the polestar of accountability systems, as Mike Petrilli and Aaron Churchill argue in «Stop Focusing on Proficiency Rates When Evaluating Schools,» is that it is only convincing if one is rating schools from the perspective of a
charter authorizer or local superintendent who wants to know whether a given school is boosting the achievement of its pupils, worsening their achievement, or holding it in some kind of steady
state.