Sentences with phrase «state control over decisions»

In the General Court's opinion, the Commission and the Council had made their decision to refuse MET status without sufficient investigation into whether the fact that the State was a substantial shareholder in Xinanchem and had influenced the appointment and composition of the board of directors necessarily amounted to State control over decisions regarding production and pricing (para. 19).

Not exact matches

The first cross-complaint, filed in February, stated that TMG «did everything within its power over the last 17 years to protect Depp from himself and to keep Depp financially solvent» but that TMG «did not have the power or ability to control Depp's spending or his numerous other vices, or to force Depp to make wiser financial decisions.»

There is no globalisation of political regulation, state or democratic institutions which provide guarantees and exert control over decisions affecting the various regions and populations of the world, in the general interest of the world at large.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson last month tightened his control over the State Department by taking back powers previously held by the top career foreign service officer, an action critics said would delay major decisions and marginalize career diplomats.

Advocates worry a required state review of submitted plans will give the Cuomo administration undue control over funding decisions.

«As is so often the case in New York State, the fiscal health of counties is shaped by decisions over which we have no direct control.

The Long Island Republican is pretty much apoplectic over the control board's unanimous decision yesterday to put his county under state oversight, insisting the move was politically motivated and born of the NIFA members» concern that his capable management will soon make them obsolete.

On Wednesday, members of the city council's Progressive Caucus, including Councilman Daniel Dromm, chair of the Education Committee, came to Albany asking state legislators to adopt a budget that provides funding mandated by the Campaign for Fiscal Equity court decision, excludes additional resources for charter schools, leaves the charter school cap at current levels and provides more local control over the city's schools.

The board and state Education Department generally have control over education decisions in the state, but recent legislation regarding the teacher evaluation system has caused a flurry of controversy.

In 26 states (including 10 of the 12 states above), the initial decision by a local school board to deny a charter school application may be appealed to the state board of education or another institution, thus curbing school districts» control over the approval of charters even where school districts are given a role.

The decision was unusual in that the court relied not on traditional separation - of - church - and - state concerns, but instead on a provision of the Colorado state constitution that vests control over public education in local school boards.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART stated there that» [d] irect control over decisions vitally affecting the education of one's children is a need that is strongly felt in our society.»

The state's move effectively shifted control over spending decisions from the state legislature to local school districts and eliminated a slew of state - imposed spending rules that many local districts saw as impediments...

To support state control over standards (which drive curriculum decisions), Common Core must be repealed.

Through the Local Control Funding Formula, which Brown shepherded through the Legislature in 2013, the state shifted control over budget decisions from the state to school districts and created an equity - based financing system that directs more money to low - income students, English learners and fosterControl Funding Formula, which Brown shepherded through the Legislature in 2013, the state shifted control over budget decisions from the state to school districts and created an equity - based financing system that directs more money to low - income students, English learners and fostercontrol over budget decisions from the state to school districts and created an equity - based financing system that directs more money to low - income students, English learners and foster youth.

Signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown on July 1, 2013, the Local Control Funding Formula aims to ensure that a higher percentage of state education dollars are directed toward California's highest need students and provides local school districts with more control over spending decControl Funding Formula aims to ensure that a higher percentage of state education dollars are directed toward California's highest need students and provides local school districts with more control over spending deccontrol over spending decisions.

The State School Board's recent decision to eliminate physical education, arts and health courses as core statewide requirements for middle - school students is seen as a way to give local districts more flexibility in designing curriculum, which is a positive development in the context of allowing more local control over education policy.

The state's move effectively shifted control over spending decisions from the state legislature to local school districts and eliminated a slew of state - imposed spending rules that many local districts saw as impediments to doing the most with their dollars.

The tenure reform effort was not nearly as sweeping as measures passed in some GOP - dominated states, where, for example, principals and superintendents have been given direct control over personnel decisions.

A parent board can govern each converted school, but the local school board still has ultimate control and the State Department of Education has veto power over most decisions made.

With regard to the imputability of national measures to the State, which is ordinarily largely presumed in case of legislative acts and predominantly based on the control exerted over the public undertaking in case of decisions taken by the latter, the AG appears to carry out a test based on remoteness.

Although it is true that in Stardust Marine the Court inferred the State origin of the resources from the control exercised by the State over a private undertaking through its majority shareholding, this principle is not applicable to the case at issue since the advantage does not originate from a decision of an undertaking, but from a legislation of a general scope — which is equally applicable to electricity providers in which the State is not the majority shareholders.

The combination of these have operated to expand judicial control over areas of state power that were hitherto secret: for example, decisions on the expulsion of non-citizens, the operation of the secret services and some of the activities of the armed forces even when they are abroad.

Because the non-exclusive native title sea rights must be shared with all others with public rights of navigation and fishing, the common law position, as stated by the majority, does not address the requirement of Indigenous control over Indigenous resources, the requirement of informed consent before major decisions are made, nor the acknowledgement of the role of Indigenous people in ensuring sustainable environmental management.