Sentences with phrase «states social security system»

Originating in 1935 after the New Deal, the United States Social Security system is a type of insurance program where employees and their employers contribute an amount per paycheck so that they are guaranteed benefits in retirement when they lose their ability to work due to disability, or after the death of a family member.

Forced to live in a motel, which is occupied by people similarly outmanoeuvred by the system, entrapped in low fee mortgages and a lack of support from the United States Social Security system, Dennis decides to fight back.

Not exact matches

He also said that state and municipal retirement pension plans should be swept into the Social Security system — and argued that the political pressures are building to force change.

At the same time, we faced a progressive tax system where we had to pay a 39.6 % Federal tax rate plus a 3.8 % Net Investment Income tax plus a 0.9 % Medicare tax plus an Alternative Minimum tax plus a 13 % State tax plus Social Security tax plus Sales tax plus retroactive State taxes to pay for government overspending.

This is what Canada should aim to achieve: a state in which technology is utilized to its full potential in solving social issues, without compromising the privacy and security of the system's end users.

The state's propensity to assign individuals identities through voter registration lists and social security numbers or more generally to reinforce conceptions of individual rights serves as an example; the roles of educational systems (through individualized test scores) and professional careers (organized around cumulative skills attached to the individual's biography) provide further examples.7 This work is important because it shows the dependence of self - constructs on markers in the culture at large: the self is understood not only in terms of internal development but also as a product of external reinforcement.

«AN ACT to amend the retirement and social security law, in relation to an optional twenty - year retirement plan for members of the New York state and local police and fire retirement system and to amend chapter 504 of the laws of 2009, amending the retirement and social security law relating to establishing police and fire retirement provisions, in relation to special retirement plans for members of the New York state police and fire retirement system»

Co-signed by the 3 main UK party leaders, it stated a commitment to grant Scotland increased power over domestic taxes and parts of the social security system.

«Together, we've made enormous strides towards building a system of social security that gets the balance right between state help and self help.

It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.

Key factors contributing to this issue include the tenuous state of the Social Security system, greater use of defined - contribution pension plans by employers, longer lifespans, and the rise of depression and other mental health issues in older Americans.

Over 6 million public sector workers are not covered by Social Security, including about 1.2 million public school teachers; in 15 states, public sector workers do not pay into or receive benefits from the system.

Teachers enrolled in the California Teachers State Retirement System (CalSTRS), however, are not covered by Social Security.

While teachers pay only 5 percent of their salaries into the PSRS — far lower than the 14 percent paid by teachers in the statewide plan — they also pay Social Security payroll taxes, unlike peers in the state retirement system, who do not participate in Social Security.

Philly teachers also receive Social Security (about a third of state and local government workers don't), so the total contribution by the Philly schools system to retirement costs is actually 29 percent of salary.

In addition, ACT protects student privacy and facilitates easy integration of test results into state systems by using state - assigned IDs instead of Social Security numbers.

Work for a state or local government agency, including a school system, college or university, may or may not be covered by Social Security.

Act Sept. 1, 1954, § 201 (b), increased the limitation on self - employment income subject to tax, for taxable years ending after 1954, from $ 3,600 to $ 4,200 and included as «wages», for purposes of computing «self - employment income,» remuneration of United States citizens employed by a foreign subsidiary of a domestic corporation which has agreed to have the Social Security insurance system extended to service performed by such citizens.

A Sunday New York Times article stated «This new breed of collector, armed with an automated system that dials tens of thousands of Americans every hour and puts their Social Security numbers, addresses and credit histories at the operator's fingertips, is chasing down late car payments, overdue credit card debt and lapsed installment loans.»

Local Attractions: Flyers Skate Zone 1 mi SandCastle Baseball Stadium 1 mi Beach and Boardwalk 2.5 mi AC Casinos 3 mi AC Convention Center 3 mi AC Medical Center and Community College 3 mi Amtrax 3 mi Greyhound 3mi NJ Transit bus system 3mi Absecon Lighthouse 4 mi Ripleys Believe It or Not 4 mi Steele Pier 4 mi Ocean Life Center 5 mi Social Security office 5 mi The Shore Mall 5 mi Noyes Museum 6 mi Atlantic City Intl Airport 7 mi NJ Tax office 7 mi Air Force Base 8 mi Shore Memorial Hospital 8 mi Stockton State College 8 mi Storybook land 8 mi Hamilton Mall 12 mi Renault Winery 16mi Come and Stay at Ramada West Atlantic City!

Economic, social, and natural systems are also inter-connected on a global scale, meaning that climate impacts in other regions of the world can pose serious economic and security risks to the United States.

Turning to the case at hand, which can be considered as the third round of the discussion, the CJEU examined the legal basis for a measure updating provisions on the coordination of social security systems between EU and Turkey as established by the Agreement, taking into account the «state of play» of a gradual extension of the free movement of workers between both contracting parties.

Similarly, in case C - 656 / 11 UK v Council, the CJEU ruled that the same applies to a measure implementing the association agreement between the EU and the Swiss Confederation, since the association agreement extended to the Switzerland the application of the EU legislation concerning coordination of social security systems, putting Switzerland in similar position as an EU Member State.

In a first case, C - 431 / 11 UK v Council, the CJEU dealt with the choice of legal basis for a measure implementing an European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement as regards social security systems and ruled that it was precisely one of the measures by which the law governing the EU internal market is to be extended as far as possible to the EEA, with the result that nationals of the EEA States concerned benefit from the free movement of persons under the same social conditions as EU citizens.

Throughout his career, Ricky has represented clients in all levels of the trial court system, before Massachusetts state and local agencies, and the Social Security Administration.

In a paragraph that could be seen as wrapping up its recent line of case law, it claims that it would be «particularly unjustified» if a Union citizen who has worked for one year in the host Member State and who has contributed to its social security and tax system by paying taxes, rates and other charges on his income, was treated in the same way as a first - time job seeker in that Member State «who has never carried on an economic activity in that State and has never contributed to that system» (para. 44).

For instance in Hungary, the health system is based on the social security contribution and state support, but there is an increasing need for a strong private sector as well.

the Pillar does not affect the right of Member States to define the principles of their social security system and manage their public finances (recital 19);

«Not to distinguish legal arrangements following from the dissolution of a state with a single social security system from the arrangements concerning the consequences for social security systems of the free movement of persons in the European Communities, or the European Union, amounts to the failure to respect the European history, it means to compare the incomparable.

59 As several of the governments which have filed observations have pointed out, the opposite interpretation would lead to unjustifiable differences in treatment between Member States, according to how their national social security systems are organised, given that the «special» nature of a benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings — and, as a consequence, the fact that it falls within the scope of Regulation No 883/2004 — depends, inter alia, on whether the grant of that benefit is based, under national law, on objective criteria or solely on the state of need of the person concerned.

72 By making the right of residence for a period of longer than three months conditional upon the person concerned not becoming an «unreasonable» burden on the social assistance «system» of the host Member State, Article 7 (1)(b) of Directive 2004/38, interpreted in the light of recital 10 to that directive, means that the competent national authorities have the power to assess, taking into account a range of factors in the light of the principle of proportionality, whether the grant of a social security benefit could place a burden on that Member State's social assistance system as a whole.

Defendant Czech Social Security Administration, the Supreme Administrative Court stated that the Minister of Labour and Social Affairs decided on 18.10.2012 to remove hardness of 6 Ads 18/2012 -192 continuation of social security provisions so that the applicant should be granted from 1 September 2012 Czech sub Match retirement, if the time to the end of 1992 was obtained in the Czech pension insurance sSocial Security Administration, the Supreme Administrative Court stated that the Minister of Labour and Social Affairs decided on 18.10.2012 to remove hardness of 6 Ads 18/2012 -192 continuation of social security provisions so that the applicant should be granted from 1 September 2012 Czech sub Match retirement, if the time to the end of 1992 was obtained in the Czech pension insuranceSecurity Administration, the Supreme Administrative Court stated that the Minister of Labour and Social Affairs decided on 18.10.2012 to remove hardness of 6 Ads 18/2012 -192 continuation of social security provisions so that the applicant should be granted from 1 September 2012 Czech sub Match retirement, if the time to the end of 1992 was obtained in the Czech pension insurance sSocial Affairs decided on 18.10.2012 to remove hardness of 6 Ads 18/2012 -192 continuation of social security provisions so that the applicant should be granted from 1 September 2012 Czech sub Match retirement, if the time to the end of 1992 was obtained in the Czech pension insurance ssocial security provisions so that the applicant should be granted from 1 September 2012 Czech sub Match retirement, if the time to the end of 1992 was obtained in the Czech pension insurancesecurity provisions so that the applicant should be granted from 1 September 2012 Czech sub Match retirement, if the time to the end of 1992 was obtained in the Czech pension insurance system.

[3] On the basis of the applicant's cassation appeal with the Supreme Administrative Court by order dated 9.5.2012, No. 6 Ads 18/2012 -82, reversed in accordance with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the interpretation of European Union law on the Court and presented him the following questions: 6 Ads 18/2012 First Excludes Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes nazaměstna not persons and their families moving within the Community (Regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Repsocial security schemes nazaměstna not persons and their families moving within the Community (Regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Rsecurity schemes nazaměstna not persons and their families moving within the Community (Regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Repsocial security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Rsecurity systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech RepSocial Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech RSecurity registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Republic?

Communications Functions Designer / Graphic Artist / Illustrator Central Intelligence Agency... 57 Defense Security Service... 51 International Paper... 47 State Farm... 25 The McGraw - Hill Companies... 50 Vanguard... 69 Journalist PPL Corporation... 32, 33 Public Relations Specialist Boy Scouts of America... 49 Girl Scouts of the USA... 53 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 State Farm... 25 Technical Writer Boy Scouts of America... 49 Defense Security Service... 51 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 Writer / Editor Central Intelligence Agency... 57 Girl Scouts of the USA... 53 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 State Farm... 25 Vanguard... 69 Computer / Technical Functions Artificial Intelligence Specialist Air Force Civilian Service... 10 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory... 17 Data Processor / MIS International Paper... 47 Macy's, Inc.... 13 McKesson... 19 The McGraw - Hill Companies... 50 Database Management Specialist Bell Helicopter Textron... 30 Defense Security Service... 51 Girl Scouts of the USA... 53 International Paper... 47 McKesson... 19 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 Job Choices: Diversity Edition National Association of Colleges and Employers Hardware Designer NAVAIR - Naval Air Systems Command... 7 Information Systems Specialist Air Force Civilian Service... 10 Central Intelligence Agency... 57 Defense Security Service... 51 International Paper... 47 McKesson... 19 Philip Morris USA, an Altria company... 1 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory... 17 The McGraw - Hill Companies... 50 Network Support / Data Communications Specialist Air Force Civilian Service... 10 Defense Security Service... 51 Girl Scouts of the USA... 53 International Paper... 47 Macy's, Inc.... 13 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 State Farm... 25 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory... 17 The McGraw - Hill Companies... 50 Operations Analyst Defense Security Service... 51 International Paper... 47 NAVAIR - Naval Air Systems Command... 7 Programmer Girl Scouts of the USA... 53 International Paper... 47 Macy's, Inc.... 13 McKesson... 19 PPL Corporation... 32, 33 State Farm... 25 The McGraw - Hill Companies... 50 Vanguard... 69 Software Designer Macy's, Inc.... 13 NAVAIR - Naval Air Systems Command... 7 The McGraw - Hill Companies... 50 Vanguard... 69 79 Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Job Choices - February 2013 - Diversity Edition Job Choices - February 2013 Diversity Edition Contents Opportunities by Employer / Website Index From Campus to Career Timeline: From Campus to Career Building the Skills That Employers Want What Employers Want Playing Fair: Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Job Seeker 10 Tips for Using Social Media in Your Job Search The Art of Writing Job - Search Letters Sample Letters A Step - by - Step Guide to a Winning Resume Sample Resumes Are You Demonstrating These on Your Resume?

In a separate Labor policy announcement on Thursday, Shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh said his party, if in Government, would establish a fine enforcement collection scheme that would allow the states and territories to use the tax and social security system to recover unpaid fines.

States parties should take particular care that indigenous peoples and racial, ethnic and linguistic minorities are not excluded from social security systems through direct or indirect discrimination, particularly through the imposition of unreasonable eligibility conditions.