The superscripts in the third column denote
the statistical significance of differences between married and widowed persons.
The superscripts in the sixth and ninth columns denote
the statistical significance of differences by the spousal age gap within each marital status.
We quantify
the statistical significance of differences in the populations of different time periods using the block bootstrap resampling approach of ref.
When testing
the statistical significance of differences between sectors, however, we take into account the full distribution of responses across all options.
Not exact matches
Statistical analyses was performed to assess the
significance of differences between vitamin A conversion factors by sex and to determine correlations between conversion factors and the BMI
of each subject.
*
Statistical significance was inferred by the 95 % CI
of the
difference between means.
I can see that you're a big fan
of relative risk, but what you're not acknowledging is that there are tests
of statistical significance that researchers run in order to determine whether any
difference between two outcomes is real or not.
However, these modest
differences did not achieve
statistical significance and could be, at least partly, the result
of confounding; adjustment for potential confounding factors was not systematically possible with the available data.
Less likely to conceive were women in the age group over 37, and here some
differences in outcome were observed, though not
of statistical significance.
Of course, there are exceptions to the rule; it is only when comparing the aggregate data that sex differences leap into the stratosphere of statistical significanc
Of course, there are exceptions to the rule; it is only when comparing the aggregate data that sex
differences leap into the stratosphere
of statistical significanc
of statistical significance.
An influential 2012 report on 120 monkeys being studied at the National Institute
of Aging (NIA) reported no
differences in survival for caloric restriction animals and a trend toward improved health that did not reach
statistical significance.
Ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 3.6 percent
of patients who received beta blockers and in 6.9 percent
of those who received a placebo, a
difference that met the threshold for
statistical significance but did not result in a clinically significant
difference, Roolvink said.
It is usually a result that has a
statistical significance that is rather low so that you might have a 20 percent
difference (UNCLEAR (4.17) or a relative risk
of 1.2 or something like that; and so it is easy when you have risks that are so small or the
differences are so small to have one study show one kind
of result and another study show a different kind
of result.
The trial was limited by its lower - than - expected event rate, which adds uncertainly about the lack
of statistical significance of some
of the small
differences seen.
For 2 - group comparisons, a 2 × 2 Yates corrected χ2 test was used to evaluate the
statistical significance of group
differences of percentages
of unscored applications and percentages
of funded applications.
Statistical significance was measured using parametric testing, assuming equal variance, in the majority
of experiments with standard t tests for 2 paired samples used to assess
difference between test and control samples.
The mechanisms responsible for a greater weight loss with the B2 regimen may be the trend toward a smaller decrease in REE with B2 that we measured (although the
difference between regimens did not reach the threshold for
statistical significance), together with a greater thermogenic response
of larger meals, as documented by others [11].
The pilot study also reported that the
difference in peripheral arterial blood flow (the movement
of blood to different parts
of the body, as measured by PAT), a predictor
of vascular health, after eating the hamburger meal compared to the hamburger - fresh avocado meal was approaching
statistical significance...
The
differences in percentage
of marital break - ups across on - line venues approached
statistical significance [χ2 (10) = 16.71, P = 0.08; Table S5], but
differences across off - line venues were not statistically significant [χ2 (9) = 10.17, P = 0.34], and neither test was significant after controlling for covariates [χ2 (10) = 14.41, P = 0.17, and χ2 (9) = 7.66, P = 0.56, respectively].
The
statistical significance of these adjusted
differences as shown in Figures 2 and 3 are estimated by models that take into account the entire distribution
of responses (e.g., very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied).
In the elementary grades 3 through 5, students
of new Teach for America teachers gained an average
of 5.8 percent
of a standard deviation more on the TAAS reading exam than did students with other new teachers, a
difference that fell just short
of statistical significance (see Figure 2).
What was the
statistical significance of the comparative
differences that are cited in the survey results?
The
difference between Jones and Nova is that Jones knows it takes a longer period
of time in order to show any
statistical significance.
It appears to me that at times the
difference between prediction an reality has been near the borderline
of statistical significance — hence posts several years back from Lucia that the trend was «falsified» and counter posts here that a correct analysis auto - correlation etc puts observations back within the confidence limit.
«Almost all concerns were rated as being closer to irrelevant then relevant and the
difference between the concerns when the paper suggested slower than and faster than was not statistically significant for any reasonable definition
of statistical significance.»
* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office *
Differences will be on the edge
of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work
of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups
of people will try to cloud the issue to the point
of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful
of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human mind.
In our analysis
of the standardised mean
difference effect sizes, we will consider an effect to be clinically relevant, irrespective
of statistical significance, by transforming the standardised mean
difference effect sizes into common language effect sizes.24, 25 An example
of transforming standardised mean
difference effect size into common language effect size is shown in a meta - analysis
of social skills group interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders by Reichow et al, 26 who showed the weighted mean effect size
of d = 0.47 equated to a gain
of 24 additional social skills for the treatment group compared with control.
Patterns
of prevalence for nonviolent delinquency, self - reported arrests, and official juvenile court delinquency records paralleled the results for violence, although the
differences did not achieve
statistical significance.
The
statistical significance of between - group
differences was established using χ2 tests with P = 0.05 (two - sided).
None
of the
differences by parental sexual orientation in children's well - being and social adjustment and in parenting quality came close to
statistical significance even by this more liberal standard.
After establishing the different groups by cluster analysis, analyses
of variance (ANOVAs) were carried out in order to analyze the
statistical significance of between - group
differences in parenting practices.
Given that the subgroups
of men and women differed substantially in size (i.e., 263 men vs. 847 women), and given poor robustness
of t - tests with very different group sizes, we tested the
statistical significance of gender
differences using t ′, which assumes lack
of homogeneity
of variance.
When considering the results
of the present study it should be noted that
differences in parental assessment
of dyadic relationships emerged at the alpha level
of p <.05 (when Bonferroni correction was applied, they sank below
statistical significance).