Sentences with phrase «stopping human climate»

Stopping human climate change forcing would be a key step.

Not exact matches

Here's a better idea for this so - called «governor» to consider: Take a look at the research done by your alma mater, Texas A&M, on global warming and the effect it will have on Texas (higher temps and greater stress on water through decreased rainfall and increased evaporation)... then stop poopooing the efforts to mitigate the effect humans are having on climate change.

Just by changing the way we farm, by stopping deep tilling, mono - cropping, and chemical fertilizer use — the Climate Collaborative estimates regenerative carbon farming practices could mitigate as much as 4 billion to 6 billion tons of CO2 equivalents a year or 10 percent to 12 percent of global human - caused emissions.

TL; DR: Human caused climate change has one solution (stop causing it by stopping the causal behavior).

The take - home message is that those parts of «reality» that are simply our human constructions — «objects» such that «if everyone stopped believing in them, they would cease to exist» — serve as obstacles preventing us from dealing with the actual realities of climate change, biodiversity loss, and other human - generated threats to our continued existence.

The study stops short of linking the rise in number and size of fires directly to human - caused climate change.

What is needed is for people to stop asking these frivolous questions, to stop stalling the process of combatting human - induced climate change and actually engage in ACTION!

While he cracks these fossil - funded zingers, reputable scientists warn that humanity is running out of time to stop climate change from self - reinforcing to the point that it spirals out of human control.

But when the topic is human - caused change that will have severe consequences if people keep on burning until climate disruption stops them, public education and outreach is also very important.

What is needed is for people to stop asking these frivolous questions, to stop stalling the process of combatting human - induced climate change and actually engage in ACTION!

Limiting Human Influences on Future Climate We can't stop climate changing, but we can reduce our many influences on it through our use of energy, land and cheClimate We can't stop climate changing, but we can reduce our many influences on it through our use of energy, land and checlimate changing, but we can reduce our many influences on it through our use of energy, land and chemicals.

in laser physics, an I am working towards a Ph.D. in abrupt climate change in a Geography department, however this has not stopped me from sitting in on many human geography and policy courses.

Professor Curry wrote, «If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I don't see a near term alternative to nuclear.»

If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I don't see a near term alternative to nuclear.

I'm even more confident that «consensus messaging» did not «cause» Pielke to stop studying science & climate change politics than that humans are causing climate change.

Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented: Executive Summary: If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I [JC] don't see a near term alternative to nClimate Collections and commented: Executive Summary: If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I [JC] don't see a near term alternative to nclimate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I [JC] don't see a near term alternative to nuclear.

That hiatus led some people who doubt mainstream findings that climate change has a human cause to conclude that global warming had stopped.

Air pressure changes, allergies increase, Alps melting, anxiety, aggressive polar bears, algal blooms, Asthma, avalanches, billions of deaths, blackbirds stop singing, blizzards, blue mussels return, boredom, budget increases, building season extension, bushfires, business opportunities, business risks, butterflies move north, cannibalistic polar bears, cardiac arrest, Cholera, civil unrest, cloud increase, cloud stripping, methane emissions from plants, cold spells (Australia), computer models, conferences, coral bleaching, coral reefs grow, coral reefs shrink, cold spells, crumbling roads, buildings and sewage systems, damages equivalent to $ 200 billion, Dengue hemorrhagic fever, dermatitis, desert advance, desert life threatened, desert retreat, destruction of the environment, diarrhoea, disappearance of coastal cities, disaster for wine industry (US), Dolomites collapse, drought, drowning people, drowning polar bears, ducks and geese decline, dust bowl in the corn belt, early spring, earlier pollen season, earthquakes, Earth light dimming, Earth slowing down, Earth spinning out of control, Earth wobbling, El Nià ± o intensification, erosion, emerging infections, encephalitis,, Everest shrinking, evolution accelerating, expansion of university climate groups, extinctions (ladybirds, pandas, pikas, polar bears, gorillas, whales, frogs, toads, turtles, orang - utan, elephants, tigers, plants, salmon, trout, wild flowers, woodlice, penguins, a million species, half of all animal and plant species), experts muzzled, extreme changes to California, famine, farmers go under, figurehead sacked, fish catches drop, fish catches rise, fish stocks decline, five million illnesses, floods, Florida economic decline, food poisoning, footpath erosion, forest decline, forest expansion, frosts, fungi invasion, Garden of Eden wilts, glacial retreat, glacial growth, global cooling, glowing clouds, Gore omnipresence, Great Lakes drop, greening of the North, Gulf Stream failure, Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, harvest increase, harvest shrinkage, hay fever epidemic, heat waves, hibernation ends too soon, hibernation ends too late, human fertility reduced, human health improvement, hurricanes, hydropower problems, hyperthermia deaths, ice sheet growth, ice sheet shrinkage, inclement weather, Inuit displacement, insurance premium rises, invasion of midges, islands sinking, itchier poison ivy, jellyfish explosion, Kew Gardens taxed, krill decline, landslides, landslides of ice at 140 mph, lawsuits increase, lawyers» income increased (surprise surprise!)

The scientific community stopped arguing if climate change is real and predominantly caused currently by humans decades ago.

Scientists stopped arguing decades ago because there is multiple lines of evidence pointing to the fact that climate change is real, happening right now and is caused primarily right now by humans.

As we say often, it is perfectly possible to believe that humans have influenced the climate, and that this influence will cause problems, while remaining sceptical of the political actions to try and stop it.

Although the technologies are still nascent, the idea that humans might help remove carbon from the skies as well as put it there is a reasonable Anthropocene expectation; it wouldn't stop climate change any time soon, but it might shorten its lease, and reduce the changes in ocean chemistry that excess carbon brings about.

About WWF Climate Savers — WWF's mission is to stop the degradation of the earth's natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature.

Your side, the side that says human emitted CO2 is the primary driver of climate change, and which (hubristically) says that natural variation can not explain all the warming we've seen, can not explain why the warming has apparently stopped for almost two decades.

Civil society, governments and business communities must accept that if we do not change the way we live on this planet and do something to reduce drastically the carbon footprint and increase dramatically access to renewable energy now through tougher regulations and an overhaul of the fossil fuel industry (stop subsidizing the polluters and begin funding the human solutions to climate change), the planet will continue to change in devastating ways.

First, that climate change has not occurred before: an idea that only works because the public generally understands that it's caused by humans and therefore can be stopped.

Even If humans quickly stop polluting the atmosphere, potentially keeping a global temperature rise to well below 2 °C (3.8 °F) compared with pre-industrial times — a major goal of the Paris climate agreement — seas may still rise by an additional 9 inches to 2 feet this century, the study concluded.

What's to stop others turning round and saying «ah, but that in itself is just a meme you've been contaminated with...» Meme theory is a product of a degraded view of human action and comes from the same misanthropic, miserable take on the world as fuels climate alarmism, in my book.

They assume we can stop warming or climate change based on the claim that it is due to human addition of CO2 to the atmosphere.

With banners reading «Climate change is a human rights issue» and «Stop the Killings» they joined an action in solidarity with human rights defenders who are persecuted across the world.

In the US last year, the EPA introduced the Clean Power Plan, a historic step towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions, stopping climate change, and protecting human health.

But, they happen independently of human activity, so thinking we can somehow «stop» the climate from changing (as it has always done) is unwise.

Today's discussion is about lessening the influence of human activities on the climate of today and the next several centuries, not about stopping climate change.

How many times can official science be wrong before governments stop acting on the claim that human CO2 is causing climate change?

They called for justice and real solutions to the climate crisis, including steep and immediate reductions in carbon emissions, stopping fossil fuels and deforestation, building renewable community - owned energy solutions, and transforming our food systems, all in the context of respect for human rights.

The letter requested that NASA in general and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in particular stop publishing the scientific conclusions about the human - driven causes of global climate disruption.

The main point of the post is that regardless whether climate change can be linked to human influences, the lazy thinking that all we need to do to solve all our problems is stop burning fossil fuels is causing us to miss opportunties and direct our efforts away from the real causes of today's problems.

Nature stopped warming despite unabated human GHG emissions, because Nature was not fooled into believing the climate models and their predicted climate sensitivity.

To do this well would require you to stop your work in physics and devote your time full - time to the study of human motivations and cognitive processes processes, as they play themselves out in the climate debate.

Conclusion # 3: Since Conclusions # 1 and # 2 are derived from the actual empirical science evidence, policymakers at the national, state, and local levels have no rational basis to make large expenditures and impose unnecessary regulations in an attempt to stop what has now become a fact-less, irrational, anti-science belief of human - caused catastrophic global warming and climate change «tipping points.»

Simply stated: facts don't lie, and there is nothing humans can do to stop natural climate change; and, the extremes it produces without any help from CO2.

Perhaps the most important issue in all this is, as the Royal Society pointed out in their assessment of geoengineering, the first and foremost thing we have to do to stop climate change is radically limit greenhouse gas emissions resulting from human activity — stopping burning fossil fuels and stopping deforestation are at the top of list for how to do that.

He's also right in that almost any activity that humans do can affect biodiversity, including (prominently) not taking action to stop climate change.

«There will be CO2 left in the atmosphere, continuing to influence the climate, more than 1000 years after humans stop emitting it,» says Susan Solomon, an atmospheric chemist with the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Boulder, Colorado.

Are you saying that the aggregate and cumulative external effects of human activities on climate change are negligible for the relevant time horizon (ie until life on earth stops for reasons not under the control of humans) or are you saying you disagree with all or some of the quantifications methods available at present?

December 2015 is the deadline for a global commitment that will bind the world and set it on the path to limit the temperature rise to 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees C) in order to stop the dire, large scale human and environmental cost of doing nothing, according to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

(Reuters)- The world should stop arguing about whether humans are causing climate change and start taking action to stop dangerous temperature rises, the president of the World Bank said.

Echoing the comments of top administration officials, Chinese communists, UN climate alarmists, and globalist billionaires obsessed with reducing the human population, Gore claimed late last month that «fertility management» that is «ubiquitously available» was crucial to stopping alleged global warming.