Likewise, a NAM report, titled «Potential Economic Impacts of
a Stricter Ozone Standard,» states that a majority of new reductions would have to come from «unknown controls.»
In 2015, the EPA promulgated
the strictest ozone standards ever, which are expected to have, at best, negligible health benefits, but could impose significant costs on consumers and the economy.
Not exact matches
You can't blame them for trying: With the White House set to change hands in less than a year's time - likely bringing on board a more eco-friendly administration - industry groups have been pressing the EPA to squelch
stricter air - quality
standards for
ozone, reports the WSJ's Stephen Power.
A group of leading scientists appointed to advise the EPA had actually recommended
stricter health
standards for
ozone levels - from 60 to 70 ppb.
The White House announcement that it was overruling the Environmental Protection Agency's plan to adopt a
stricter standard for ground - level
ozone came just hours after another dismal jobs reports and in the midst of an intensifying political debate over the impact of federal regulations on job creation