Not exact matches
Society isn't happy
with single moms; according to a 2011 Pew Research Center
study, nearly seven out of 10 said the trend toward single mothers was bad for society (although writer Tracy Mayor in Brain, Child magazine
calls out the actual
question asked by Pew researchers — how people felt about «more single women deciding to have children without a male partner to help raise them,» not whether they think single mothers per se are bad for society.
In the
study, published online June 3, 2014 in the journal Nutrition, Keck School of Medicine researchers analyzed the chemical composition of 34 popular beverages, finding that beverages and juices made
with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), such as Coca - Cola, Pepsi, Dr Pepper, Mountain Dew and Sprite, all contain 50 percent more fructose than glucose, a blend that
calls into
question claims that sugar and HFCS are essentially the same.
Recent
studies have shown an increase in women
with breast cancer choosing this more aggressive surgery,
called contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, which raises the
question of potential overtreatment among these patients.
A new
study out today in the journal Neurology examines the
question of quality of life for individuals
with a common form of lower back pain
called lumbar spinal stenosis.
This
study answers a fundamental
question about the behavior of large, negatively charged ions
with multiple atoms,
called polyoxyanions.
To address some of those
questions, scientists have been
studying Jupiter
with an observatory
called the Very Large Array in New Mexico.
The
study — which examined insurance claims data for more than 3,000 patients who were at risk for stroke due to atrial fibrillation, treated
with anticoagulants, and later admitted to a hospital for bleeding —
calls into
question the current medical belief that the older drug is safer.
Critics are now
calling into
question the veracity of the
study, claiming it is filled
with flawed assumptions.
I'm also not a doctor (not a medical doctor, anyway), and I'm not at all familiar
with peer - reviewed
studies related to my
question, but it did have to do
with, as Emanuil said, what's commonly
called «carb flu.»
for example did they factor for modern wheat consumption considering how it has been
called into serious
question with Denise Mingers reassessment of wheat consumption increases from CHina
Study Data?
This was segmented into three other moments which
call tests, in order to facilitate the
study and the large number of data associated
with each point in analyzing the music in
question.
Some recent research
calls the claim into
question with multiple
studies showing that skipping breakfast has no impact on weight gain or loss.
This
study calls into
question the notion that providing underprivileged children
with computers will automatically raise their academic achievement.
Most surprising: acquirers purchasing targets
with higher P / E ratios outperformed acquirers of targets
with lower P / E ratios, which seems to fly in the face of every
study I've ever read, and
calls into
question everything that is good and holy in the world.
But before we all go out and buy T - shirts
with some romantic imperative like «Save the Ovaries», perhaps we should step back and consider the following
question: Why haven't previous dog
studies called our attention to this potential downside of ovariectomy?
Yet this factor
calls into
question the frequency
with which cats and dogs should have oral radiographs taken, and should be better documented in
studies to follow.
Still, while Rose modestly
calls How Artists Draw «a first examination of the collection and a rough sketch of some of the
questions the new
study center might address,» her «sketch» is so good that I wouldn't complain if the Menil replaced its permanent modern art installation
with this show while we wait for the new building.
Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which
calls into
question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across
studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in
studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting
studies of children
with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations
with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).
The
study, published in Social Science Research, supposedly
calls into
question the empirically - based argument that children who grow up in households
with two mommies or two daddies generally show no differences on a host of outcomes relative to kids who grow up
with a mom and a dad.