Sentences with phrase «subscale scores by»

Mean Subscale Scores by gender for the self completed SDQ in a community sample of 11 — 17 year old Chinese children

Association of Mothers» and Fathers» Mental Health Symptoms With Children's Child Behavior Problem Index — Externalizing (BPI - EXT) and — Internalizing (BPI - INT) Subscale Scores by the Child's Sex, Multivariate Linear Regression

Mean Subscale Scores by age and gender for the parent completed SDQ in a community sample of 3 — 17 year old Chinese children

Descriptive statistics document the mean reported number of trauma experiences and posttraumatic stress subscale scores by participants» sociodemographic variables.

Not exact matches

aChild Behavior Checklist for 4 - 18 years; bChildren who are currently visiting their father who used to perpetrate intimate partner violence and already separated from their mothers; cInternalizing problems = Withdrawn + Somatic complaints + Anxious / depressed; dExternalizing problems = Delinquent behavior + Aggressive behavior; Total problems = the sum of the scores of all the nine subscales of the CBCL; eAdjusted odds ratios calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; fThe dependent variable: 0 = non - clinical, 1 = clinical; gp values calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; hStandardized regression coefficients calculated by multivariable regression analysis; ip values calculated by multivariable regression analysis; jVariance Inflation Factor; k0 = non-visiting, 1 = visiting; lThe score of the subscale (anxiety) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regression analysis.

We calculated a SDQ total difficulties score by summing individual subscale scores (excluding the prosocial subscale).

A total difficulties score ranging from 0 to 40 was derived by summing all subscales excluding prosocial behaviours.16 Total difficulties scores are considered to provide an indicator of level of risk for emotional or behavioural problems.

Table 2 shows the mean (SD) scores for each of the PedsQL scales and subscales by weight category.

An overall score representing total difficulties was computed by summing the externalizing and internalizing behavior subscales; α coefficients for parent and teacher reports ranged from 0.70 to 0.85.

Summary scores for children's total, physical, and psychosocial health and subscale scores for emotional, social, and school functioning were compared by weight category based on International Obesity Task Force cut points.

Finally, to examine possible threshold and nonlinear relationships that might cut across current overweight and obese cut points, locally weighted regression techniques were used to generate lines of best fit for the relationships between BMI z scores and PedsQL total, summary, and subscale scores that differed significantly by weight category; P <.05 was considered significant.

Parenting sense of competence was slightly lower among intervention recipients (β level, − 0.92 [95 % CI, − 1.40 to − 0.44]-RRB-, an effect driven by lower scores on the satisfaction subscale rather than by differences in self - efficacy (Table 4).

Variables were created by calculating the mean of all items in a subscale, and missing items were replaced with the participant's mean subscale score.

The total and factor scores of the JW - DEQ version B and the HADS subscale scores were correlated by means of the Pearson product - moment correlation coefficients (concurrent validity).

Several studies have replicated the PSC - 17's 3 - factor structure by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in moderate - sized samples, 26,27 and a number of studies28 — 37 have reported on the prevalence of risk by using the overall and subscale scores.

The mean scores across the three virtues were obtained by averaging the scores for each subscale.

The BB families also had enhanced parent - child interaction, including overall score (ES, 0.31), 2 subscales (provision of toys and reading; ES, 0.30 to 0.34), and 1 of the Reading Activities variables measured by the diary (ES, 0.33).

The mean scores for mothers» responses to the 3 CBCL subscales were comparable to those for nonreferred children reported by Achenbach, 24 suggesting that levels of behavioral problems for the Healthy Steps children were similar to the levels for generally healthy children.

Early studies found EPQ - RSC to have high reliability and validity as a measure of personality traits in China.47 48 The total score for the extraversion subscale indicates introversion when it is less than 43.3, intermediate when it is from 43.3 to 56.7 «and extraversion when it is greater than 56.7.48 For the psychoticism subscale, tough - minded is defined as a total score greater than 56.7, intermediate is defined as a total score between 43.3 and 56.7 «and mild is defined as a total score less than 43.3.48 For the neuroticism subscale, a total score of less than 43.3 defines emotional stability, whereas a total score from 43.3 to 56.7 defines intermediate «and a total score greater than 56.7 defines emotional instability.48 For the lie subscale, a total score of 60 or greater indicates that information provided by the respondent might be unreliable.48 In this study, Cronbach's α for EPQ - RSC was 0.903.

Items and response options were unmodified from the original scale, and the standard scoring metric applied: five items assessed each of the subscales, and Total Difficulties was computed by summing the 20 items from the four psychopathology subscales.

Nine subscales are formed by counting the number of items scoring 2 or 3 and dividing by the number of items for each scale, resulting in scales from 0 to 1.

Subscale scores were obtained by summing scores for each subject's subscale items; higher scores indicate greater endorsement of that coping sSubscale scores were obtained by summing scores for each subject's subscale items; higher scores indicate greater endorsement of that coping ssubscale items; higher scores indicate greater endorsement of that coping strategy.

A general health questionnaire score of 5 or more (caseness) was predicted by a higher score on the illness behaviour questionnaire affective inhibition subscale (P = 0.01).

A total score for child related strains was calculated by computing a mean score of all four subscales.

Subscale scores can be computed by summing across items after recoding a number of reversed items.

Before computing the subscale scores (sum across nine items; theoretical range 9 — 54), missing values (one to eight missing item responses for 7 participants) were substituted by this participant's scale mean based on the nonmissing items to obtain sum scores.

The fourth profile was Sets Limits + Restricts All Snacks (n = 23) and was characterized by mothers who reported controlling their daughters» access to snack foods by keeping all snacks out of their daughter's reach; scores were higher on this subscale than on the remaining profiles (P < 0.05, d = 5.00 — 9.00).

The SDQ Total Difficulties Score (TDS) was calculated by aggregating the scores for the emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity - inattention, and peer problems subscales (range 0 — 40).

The SCAS - C / P total scores are calculated by summing all subscale scores.

Total scores per subscale are obtained by summing up all item scores for the scale in question.

The unique relations of each YPI subscale with the NEO domains / facets were examined by computing partial correlations controlling for the scores on the other two YPI psychopathy subscales.

The ASQ includes five scales: (1) ASQ - F1, «Confidence in relationships»; higher scores in this subscale indicate a secure attachment (e.g., «I find it relatively easy to get close to other people»); (2) ASQ - F2, «Need for approval» denotes both worried and fearful aspects of attachment, characterized by an individual's need for others» approval and acceptance (e.g., «It's important for me to avoid doing things that others won't like»); (3) ASQ - F3: the subjects» anxious behavior in searching for others, motivated by the necessity to fulfill dependency needs, is depicted by the subscale «Preoccupation with relationships»; it represents a central topic in the conceptualization of anxious / ambivalent attachment (e.g., «It's very important for me to have a close relationship»); (4) ASQ - F4, «Discomfort with closeness» reflects an avoidant attachment (e.g., «I prefer to keep to myself»), and (5) ASQ - F5 «Relationships as secondary» is typical of a dismissive style, in which subjects tend to emphasize achievements and independence, in order to protect themselves against hurt and vulnerability (e.g., «To ask for help is to admit that you're a failure»).

The secure attachment is characterized by high scores on AAS subscales «close» and «depend» and a low score on AAS subscale «anxiety.»

The CBCL has nine behavioural problem subscales, and queries about the child's behaviour in the past six months.13, 14 The T - scores for each scale are calculated by a computer program.

We performed forward - entry multiple regression analyses to investigate our first two key questions, namely, which variables correlate with depressive symptoms (as measured by the DASS depression subscale), and whether DASS depression scores correlate with physical disability (as measured by the RMDQ) after controlling for other variables known to affect physical disability.

As recommended by Cosco et al. [6], findings like ours should induce caution in the interpretation of group factors scores, posing the clinical usefulness of the two subscales as questionable.

A within - group process subscale score was derived by summing the seven subscales (Cronbach's α =.85).

The ROC analysis uses each value across the entire range of the CBCL subscale T - scores as the cut - off for defining a case and compares this classification to the «true» diagnosis, as defined by the structured diagnostic interview.

The avoidant attachment is characterized by low scores on all three subscales.

The anxious attachment is characterized by a high score on the AAS subscale «anxiety» and moderate scores on the subscales «close» and «depend.»

Subscale scores were computed by summing scores for all items included in a specific subscale (αs ranged from.72Subscale scores were computed by summing scores for all items included in a specific subscale (αs ranged from.72subscale (αs ranged from.72 to.76).

Scale scores can be prorated if at least three items in each subscale are completed and UK normed screening cut - offs are available to identify «abnormal» (top 10 %) and «borderline» (the next 10 %) levels of difficulties by age and gender (http://www.sdqinfo.com).

A total difficulties score (0 — 40) was computed by adding scores from the four problem subscales (conduct, hyperactivity, emotional, and peer problem domains)[27, 28, 29].

Children with current sleep problems were more likely still to be nursed to sleep by an adult and had slightly higher mean scores on Child Behavior Check List subscales for Aggressive Behavior (54 vs 52) and Somatic Problems (55 vs 53).