Sentences with phrase «such changes to the constitution»

Such changes to the constitution must be submitted to the AGM of the breed clubs for agreement.

Not exact matches

If any members of the Church including also individual bishops were to demand that the Church should alter her constitution in a way contradicting her dogmatically defined self - understanding, such movement in favour of change would actually no longer take place within the Church but outside, for those demanding such a change could no longer belong to the Church in the full sense of a visible society.

There are a few main explanations: 1) long term failure in leadership by the Irish Catholic church, and connected with this, the awful Jansenist culture; 2) Europe — or rather, political interference from European Community institutions; 3) American money; 4) the claim of the «Yes» campaign that the Referendum was won by «the stories,» that is, the constant appeal to emotion and the complete refusal actually to think about the legal consequences of passing such a change not merely into law, but also into the Irish Constitution, the foundation of that law.

The new constitution upholds freedom of religion, but also states that «no one shall attempt to change or convert someone from one religion to another, or disturb / jeopardize the religion of others, and such acts / activities shall be punishable by law.»

The six decades during which she has straddled the roles both of head of state and of Supreme Governor of the Church of England have witnessed such societal change that it is almost as if her detractors are waiting patiently for her to leave the stage, before redeveloping the constitution over which the Queen presides.

This they do confessedly... at the hazard of such changes in the constitution from difference of climate as to render their return dangerous, and at the risk of weakening those domestic ties connected with the parental domicile, which are seldom severed but at the expense of virtue.»

Such a move would require a change to Labour's constitution to be passed by the party conference, but given that the unions — most of which back Corbyn — hold 50 % of the votes, it would be possible.

If it seems like such a flagrant injustice to so many English people... then change the constitution and see how easy it is to get a Labour majority without scottish and Welsh Labour MP's.

Under Supreme Court constitutional interpretation, since individual states never had the original sovereign authority to unilaterally change the terms and conditions of service of federal officials agreed to and established in the Constitution, such a power could not be «reserved» under the Tenth Amendment.

But how can such a constitutional guarantee be made without significant changes to parliamentary sovereignty, the very basis of the British constitution?

In addition, the Committee may (i) recommend to the Council appropriate changes in the Constitution and Bylaws; (ii) establish, charge, and, when appropriate, terminate committees to report to the Council on any aspect of Association policy or program or on other matters affecting the advancement of science; (iii) recommend to the Council that it establish and, when appropriate, terminate such committees.

Having seen a strong civil society reaction against such a change that was deemed to run against the principle of constitutionalism, Abe had to abandon the plan, and that is how he then came around to the idea of simply revising the official government interpretation of the constitution to lift the ban on CSD.

The entire waiver process was sloppily administered in the first place, with Duncan granting waivers to states (and allowing them to ignore whole sections of No Child) even thought they have not yet implemented or enacted all the proposals within their applications, and the administration ignoring concerns raised by its own peer review panels about such matters as how states have ignored the need to gain consultation on proposed changes from American Indian tribes as required under the U.S. Constitution (as well as from black and Latino communities equally affected by the evisceration of accountability).

But if the Senate were to magical change, the people could consider it wrong and could revoke such decision which could voting out such a Senate and altering any law or the constitution if they wished.

Instead, such a «major change to UK constitutional arrangements [with the consequent changes in domestic law rights for individuals] must be effected in the only way that the UK constitution recognises, namely by Parliamentary legislation.»

I believe that, once we have agreed on a Bill of Rights, an amending formula, and a system of final adjudication, little would stand in the way of a general constitutional conference to discuss such other particular changes as may be necessary to adapt our constitution to the requirements of our day.

It's been said to me that such an initiative — a referendum to change the Constitution - will suck up a lot of oxygen and resources and perhaps even goodwill.

The Interim National Executive should seek legal advice on the best mechanisms to achieve this — for example, such as requiring 75 % majority vote in the National Congress or by having different categories of membership (with only one group entitled to vote on changes to the Constitution).