Not exact matches
Its a sad day when our young black men do nt have the
freedom to walk through certain neighborhoods without being harrased are mudered, no one has the right to just take a life just because
of the color
of your skin we as a people has to stand up to injustices
such as this no one wants to hear the truth there is still a racial devide in America and our justice system create laws so that this
kind of injustice can continue to happen rather u want to admit it are not our young black men are the prey.
When I read this, about 15 years ago, I was stunned that God wanted His people to use the tithe to celebrate with our families and to help the less financially «properous» people (instead
of judging them) I had
such mixed feelings,
of freedom and joy in God but also a
kind of betrayal from what has been taught, almost to scare us.
The
kind of action from social awareness that is demanded by perfect love is
such as must admit the tragic reality that there are people who are genuinely intent upon using their
freedom to destroy the
freedom of others, and that, under certain circumstances, love itself may dictate that «It is better that many should die prematurely than that nearly all men should live in a permanent state
of hostility or slavery» (MVG 173).
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and
freedoms of this Declaration without distinction
of any
kind such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status».
This knowledge gives a
kind of certainty
such as is possible in the realm
of history and
freedom, that is as a claim to make
freedom itself a binding norm.
It may also happen that
such a Christianity gives the impression
of a
kind of drill, almost
of a subtle form
of brainwashing, a sociological routine which may produce a bourgeois Christianity but not Christian
freedom, and which therefore remains unimportant in the sight
of God.
They often include provisions about religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do in the case
of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be in
such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included in the relationship; what sexual practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what
kinds of freedom each partner is to have.
When we think
of all that has come from him in the impulse toward human
freedom and dignity — the challenge
of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest
of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight
of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those in every
kind of suffering, the stabilizing
of the inner lives
of millions
of his followers around the world, and the fostering
of a prophetic attack on
such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the things that have stemmed from this «penniless teacher
of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder
of it does not sweep over our souls.
Genuine pluralism is a civilizational achievement: the achievement
of what Murray called an «orderly conversation» — a conversation about personal goods and the common good, about the relationship between
freedom and moral truth, about the virtues necessary to form the
kind of citizens who can live their
freedom in
such a way as to make the machinery
of democracy serve genuinely humanistic ends.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit
of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part
of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out
of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking
of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case
of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded
such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best
of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil
of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the
kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version
of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more
freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much
of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club
of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
There is no doubt that Bale needs to get the hell out
of Real if he ever wants to be the
kind of player he once was... this isn't to suggest that he his skills have diminished, he simply isn't the fiery, determined and aggressive player that struck fear in the hearts
of his opponents... the small fish in a big pond just doesn't fit his profile... I can't even remember the last player I've seen who has become so invisible on the big stage (maybe Pogba last year)... maybe it's a case
of culture shock or maybe he wasn't able to handle the notoriety that invariably came with his big money signing, but regardless
of how it happened this guy is a shadow
of his former self... although I doubt he would ever come to a team in
such disarray, he could quite easily fill the shoes
of Sanchez, who ironically was in a similar predicament in Barcelona, as Bale would return to his favoured left side and would be given the same
freedoms that have allowed Sanchez to flourish... ultimately I think the cache
of wearing a Real jersey and competing for the top trophies would be too difficult to give up for a wannabe club run by suits who care little about those
kinds of accolades
What is baffling for anarchists is how moderate republicans, having uncovered
such a radical conception
of freedom as non-domination, fail to advocate the
kind of radical economic and political changes needed to create a society free from domination.
Civil libertarianism is a strain
of political thought that supports civil liberties, or which emphasizes the supremacy
of individual rights and personal
freedoms over and against any
kind of authority (
such as a state, a corporation, social norms imposed through peer pressure, etc.).
It also occurred to me that movies about sexual
freedom,
such as Crash, Baise - moi and 40 Days and 40 Nights, tend not to receive the same
kind of praise as films about sexual repression like this, Trouble Every Day and Romance.
We can have all
kinds of rules to reduce
such differences,
such as rules that limit a school's
freedom to choose students.
They work to engage all
kinds of learners, encourage
freedom of expression without anxiety and teach valuable skills
such as creativity and curiosity.
Shaw Shank Redemption EssayYou may have been asked to write on the topic, «Discuss.The Shaw shank Redemptio n'The first thing a Shaw shank Redemption essay must do is to give a little information about the background by stating that this is a film that has been directed by Frank Darabont who has paid special attention to the different
kinds of oppositions and conflicts
such as:
Freedom vs. imprisonmentCharity vs. brutalityInnocence vs. guiltWhile drawing our attention to these binary Continue reading
As far as I can tell from a quick read
of the ninth installment, titled Take the Money and Run, Escapology is a
kind of very extreme early retirement worldview that puts the focus on
freedom rather than material possessions and the myriad
of costly services most
of us regard as a necessity in this gadget - crazy 21st century (i.e. wireless access, cable TV, smartphones and social media, subscriptions to movie services and magazines and all those other services provided by businesses
such as my employer, Rogers).
It's easier to forgive these flaws when you consider just how captivating a world this game creates, a world that allows for so much
freedom and versatility, a world with
such a rich sense
of history, a world filled with women virtuous and evil,
kind and cunning, poor and powerful.
Few artists
of our time have made more
of that
kind of «
freedom» than Richard Diebenkorn - which is why this retrospective is
such an absorbing event.
Supporting the generation and dissemination
of public knowledge
of the sciences relevant to the global eco-crises we've produced (and how best to undo / manage
such crises) is not a bad idea / activity to pursue; especially if we're determined to nurture and secure the
kinds of clear signals for which future generations are likely to say thanks for your life - affirming,
freedom - loving labors.
These actions are likely to include measures
such as greater concerted world action, curtailing the
freedoms of individuals, companies and nations, and curbing some
kinds of industrial activity, potentially risking economic growth.
That is so obvious and fundamental an intrusion on individual rights, and represents
such a terrible precedent for the exercise
of freedoms of all
kinds (starting with religious
freedom but, I guarantee, not ending there) that the level
of support this bill enjoys simply blows my mind.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and
freedoms set forth in the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, without distinction
of any
kind,
such as race, creed, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.