Related Highlights: Double Bonus: Win - Win for Atmospheric Particle Properties; Fast and Rigorous: Finding
Surface Reflectivity by Looking Up at Clouds; Lord of the Wings: Elevated Particles a Rising Star.
Not exact matches
The research showed that, compared to pure snow and ice, the
reflectivity of the glacier (known as the «albedo») can be reduced
by up to 80 % in places where coloured microbial populations are extremely dense, leading to the darkening of the glacier
surface.
Modifying the roofs with light - colored tiles, the team found that using light - colored concrete, or applying white glazes to buildings, could increase the
reflectivity of urban
surfaces by 10 %.
The
surface's
reflectivity, which scientists call albedo, could decrease
by as much as 10 percent
by the end of the century, the study finds.
By measuring the
surface temperature of a Kuiper Belt object, and combining this with optical observations, its
surface reflectivity and hence its diameter can be determined accurately.
Using satellite data, the scientists then assessed how this new tree and plant cover would drive three climate feedbacks: water vapor in the air, carbon absorption
by plants and the
reflectivity of the Earth's
surface.
sigmaT ^ 4 is the upward blackbody radiation (based on stefan - boltzmann) at the
surface, «a» is the albedo (
reflectivity), so (1 - a) is the fraction of incident solar radiation that is absorbed
by the planet.
Geoengineering proposals fall into at least three broad categories: 1) managing atmospheric greenhouse gases (e.g., ocean fertilization and atmospheric carbon capture and sequestration), 2) cooling the Earth
by reflecting sunlight (e.g., putting reflective particles into the atmosphere, putting mirrors in space to reflect the sun's energy, increasing
surface reflectivity and altering the amount or characteristics of clouds), and 3) moderating specific impacts of global warming (e.g., efforts to limit sea level rise
by increasing land storage of water, protecting ice sheets or artificially enhancing mountain glaciers).
«Applying a 3.6 % cloud
reflectivity perturbation to the shortwave energy balance partitioning given
by Trenberth et al. (2009) corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Wm ⁻² of solar energy reaching the Earth's
surface and an increase of 2.4 Wm ⁻² absorbed
by the
surface.»
It would have to be something that affected the net heat balance of the earth
by affecting incoming radiation (solar inputs, aerosols, clouds), the
reflectivity of the earth (ice caps, land use changes) or the ability of the
surface to cool (greenhouse gases).
As the earth's natural air conditioner, white sea ice moderates solar heating
by increasing the
reflectivity of Earth's
surface and decreasing the amount of heat that would otherwise
by absorbed
by darker ice - free Arctic seas.
For example, the dramatic decline of summer sea ice in the Arctic — a loss of ice cover roughly equal to half the area of the continental United States — exacerbates global warming
by reducing the
reflectivity of Earth's
surface and increasing the amount of heat absorbed.
That is until the
surface is covered
by snow, which being about the same
reflectivity as clouds, cancels the decrease in the incident power so that the net effect is to trap
surface warmth.
In short, Lindzen's argument is that the radiative forcing from aerosols is highly uncertain with large error bars, and that they have both cooling (mainly
by scattering sunlight and seeding clouds) and warming (mainly
by black carbon darkening the Earth's
surface and reducing its
reflectivity) effects.
But these snow - covered caps are increasingly interrupted
by pits like these, whose black mud bottoms of rocky sediment called cryoconite drastically reduces polar
surface reflectivity.
As others have pointed out, excluding clouds, the average
reflectivity of earth's
surface is about 0.124 Earth is not a blackbody, most of the earth is covered
by ocean, which has an emissivity between 0.92 and 0.96 - I'll use a 0.94 average.
The albedo of the Earth System, including the
reflectivity of clouds and of the
surface is estimated to be 70 % 30 %
by many experts.
Is there any likelihood a bloom of plankton (from a freshwater pulse, or fallout of a dust cloud full of minerals, for example) would change the temperature of the
surface water (change the
reflectivity, I suppose, or change how much is absorbed
by making more complicated molecules for photosynthesis)-- sufficient to make the water mass density change, affecting whether it sinks or not?
Abstract «Optically thin AlGaAs / GaAs / AlGaAs double heterostructures, (5000 Å), are floated off their substrates
by the epitaxial liftoff technique and mounted on various high
reflectivity surfaces.
They are now quite complex and factor in things like; variable output
by the sun, variations in the earth's orbit around the sun, greenhouse gases AND dust from volcanoes, greenhouse gases from decay in wetlands and from agriculture (rice paddies are artificial wetlands), differences in the
reflectivity («albedo») of different
surfaces (grass reflects more sunlight than forest, and ice much more than open water etc.)... and there are many more.
The albedo or
reflectivity of the ice
surface is decreased
by coating the
surface with black particulates which don't reflect but absorb the heat from the Sun.
Because meltwater is less reflective than ice, the
surface of the ice sheet is already absorbing more sunlight — previous research found that the
reflectivity of the Greenland ice has dropped
by 6 percent in the last decade, according to an Ohio State University release on the new research.