System of care evaluation: The evaluation of strengths / needs based practice.
Not exact matches
How can you be accused
of neglect when there is no abuse well cps said we both need to see doctors we both need to see them for a medical physiological
evaluation all because we objected to a false claim from a hospital a hospital that did a forced c section on my wife so that they could receive more money from DSHS The cash machine for the poor who in return take's babies to keep there service going selling babies for 25.000 dollars yes it's a sick
system one that «Hitler Would be proud
of The SS worker who brought a Sheriff with her all to see yes our child, is safe yes we
care for him!
However, the findings are unexpected and the obstetric
care system of the Netherlands needs further
evaluation.
By using existing communication infrastructure and expanding the capability
of existing mobile phone technology, mobile phone microscopy
systems could enable greater access to high - quality health
care by allowing rapid, on - or off - site microscopic
evaluation of patient samples.
After extensive research on teacher
evaluation procedures, the Measures
of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring
System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student
evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions
of teachers» ability to
care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multiple years.
Paedagogica Historica: International Journal
of the History
of Education Parenting for High Potential PASAA: Journal
of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand Pastoral
Care in Education Peabody Journal
of Education Pedagogical Research Pedagogies: An International Journal Pedagogy, Culture and Society Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education Perspectives in Education Perspectives in Peer Programs Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education Phi Delta Kappan Philosophical Inquiry in Education Philosophical Studies in Education Philosophy
of Music Education Review Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Physical Educator Physical Review Physics Education Research Physics Education Physics Teacher Planning and Changing Policy Futures in Education portal: Libraries and the Academy Practical Assessment, Research &
Evaluation Practice and Theory in
Systems of Education Practitioner Research in Higher Education Preventing School Failure Primary Science PRIMUS Professional Counselor Professional Development in Education Professional Educator Professional School Counseling PROFILE: Issues in Teachers» Professional Development Prospects: Quarterly Review
of Comparative Education Psicol gica: International Journal
of Methodology and Experimental Psychology Psychology in the Schools Psychology Learning and Teaching Psychology Teaching Review Public Services Quarterly
New York took special
care in developing its teacher
evaluation system to include teachers
of English language learners and English as a second language teachers.
State accountability
systems that emphasize minimum proficiency and teacher
evaluation systems that focus monomaniacally on improving reading and math scores have the effect
of marginalizing those students whose families have taken
care to read to them and do math problems with them — and who look to schools for more.
Determined patient needs based upon initial home
evaluation; established nursing
care plan and charting
system to ensure continuity
of care.
• Hands - on experience in assisting practitioners and nurses in implementing plans
of care for emergency
care patients • Documented success in performing patient
care procedures and treatments in sync with devised plans
of care • Competent at observing patients and reporting their conditions to appropriate supervisors to ensure constant
care and
evaluation • Adept at handling non-invasive monitoring
systems such as taking and recoding vitals, placing oxygen saturation equipment properly and observing cardiac monitors on a constant basis
• Establish and monitor patient
care standards and make recommendations for plausible changes within the
system • Design educational programs for patients and their families and assist nursing staff in implementing these programs • Develop and implement interdisciplinary plans
of care for complex and / or high risk patients • Provide feedback to physicians and other healthcare professionals to assist them in handling the needs
of each individual patient • Perform clinical
evaluations and make clinical judgements to resolve complex nursing issues • Serve as a clinical expert in delivery
of perioperative
care and assist in the provision
of surgical
care • Decide where and how to allocate nursing staff and associated resources • Assess patients to determine their conditions and develop and implement specialized treatment plans • Analyze patient data and outcomes and write correlating reports
• To excel in the field
of Nursing through professional nursing
care such as assessment, planning, implementation,
evaluation, and documentation
of patient
care by attaining a Nursing Coop position at Baptist St Anthony's Health
System.
Assist the Director
of Nursing Services in the design, implementation and
evaluation of nursing
systems that ensure consistent delivery
of care and maintains and promotes resident rights.
Charted and recorded information in client files.Tracked client movement on and off the unit by documenting times and destinations
of clients.Checked facility for open windows, locked doors, malfunctioning smoke detectors and other safety hazards.Quickly responded to crisis situations when severe mental health and behavioral issues arose.Efficiently gathered information from families and social services agencies to inform development
of treatment plans.Documented all patient information including service plans, treatment reports and progress notes.Collaborated closely with treatment team to appropriately coordinate client
care services.Developed comprehensive treatment plans that focused on accurate diagnosis and behavioral treatment
of problems.Consulted with psychiatrists about client medication changes, issues with medicine compliance and efficacy
of medications.Organized treatment projects that focused on problem solving skills and creative thinking.Referred clients to other programs and community agencies to enhance treatment processes.Created and reviewed master treatment and discharge plans for each client.Guided clients in understanding illnesses and treatment plans.Developed appropriate policies for the identification
of medically - related social and emotional needs
of clients.Assisted clients in scheduling home visits and phone calls and monitored effectiveness
of these activities.Evaluated patients for psychiatric services and psychotropic medications.Monitored patients prescribed psychotropic medications to assess the medications» effectiveness and side effects.Evaluated patients to determine potential need to transfer to specialized inpatient mental health facilities.Administered medication to patients presenting serious risk
of danger to themselves and others.Conducted psychiatric
evaluations and executed medication management for both inpatient and outpatient facilities.Led patients in individual, family, group and marital therapy sessions.Diagnosed mental health, emotional and substance abuse disorders.Recorded comprehensive patient histories and coordinated treatment plans with multi-disciplinary team members.Consulted with and developed appropriate treatment and rehabilitation plans for dually diagnosed patients.Referenced and used various therapy techniques, including psychodynamic, family
systems, cognitive behavioral and lifespan integration psychotherapy.
Physical
Evaluation Board Liaison Officer Serviced a 20 - state health
system comprised
of two major tertiary
care academic medical centers, five community hospitals, two health centers, and 29 outlying clinics.
Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through
Systems of Care: Building the Infrastructure: A Guide for Communities Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Designed for communities developing and implementing systems of care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components of the infrastructure needed to support systems o
Systems of Care: Building the Infrastructure: A Guide for Communities Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Designed for communities developing and implementing systems of care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components of the infrastructure needed to support systems of c
Care: Building the Infrastructure: A Guide for Communities Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Designed for communities developing and implementing systems of care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components of the infrastructure needed to support systems o
Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Designed for communities developing and implementing systems of care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components of the infrastructure needed to support systems of c
Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Designed for communities developing and implementing
systems of care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components of the infrastructure needed to support systems o
systems of care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components of the infrastructure needed to support systems of c
care, this guide outlines definitions, goals, activities, personnel, and expected outcomes for the fundamental components
of the infrastructure needed to support
systems o
systems of carecare.
Electronic copies
of products developed by the National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for Systems of Care including: evaluation reports; a Policy Action Guide with fillable forms in PDF and Word; short action briefs on family involvement, establishing partnerships in child welfare, gaining staff buy - in, and leadership development; and infrastructure toolkits on various topics around implementing a Syste
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care including:
evaluation reports; a Policy Action Guide with fillable forms in PDF and Word; short action briefs on family involvement, establishing partnerships in child welfare, gaining staff buy - in, and leadership development; and infrastructure toolkits on various topics around implementing a Syste
evaluation reports; a Policy Action Guide with fillable forms in PDF and Word; short action briefs on family involvement, establishing partnerships in child welfare, gaining staff buy - in, and leadership development; and infrastructure toolkits on various topics around implementing a
System of Care.
These action briefs highlight key findings from the national cross-site
evaluation, share lessons learned by
Systems of Care grant communities, and outline key steps for initiative leaders to advance systems and organizational
Systems of Care grant communities, and outline key steps for initiative leaders to advance
systems and organizational
systems and organizational change.
Building Agency Capacity for Family Involvement in Child Welfare (PDF - 553 KB) Action Brief National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for Systems of Care, 2011 Draws from evaluation findings to present action steps and strategies for preparing a child welfare agency and its staff to engage families ef
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care, 2011 Draws from
evaluation findings to present action steps and strategies for preparing a child welfare agency and its staff to engage families ef
evaluation findings to present action steps and strategies for preparing a child welfare agency and its staff to engage families effectively.
Systems of Care Implementation Case Studies (PDF - 1,198 KB) National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care, 2010 Features detailed examination
of the strategies and approaches used by two grant sites — Contra Costa County, California, and North Carolina — to implement
Systems of Care principles, including family involvement.
Systems of Care National
Evaluation Logic Model (PPT - 23 KB) Describes the grantees» strategic planning of infrastructure and service delivery as well as the cross-site process and outcome evaluation for the i
Evaluation Logic Model (PPT - 23 KB) Describes the grantees» strategic planning
of infrastructure and service delivery as well as the cross-site process and outcome
evaluation for the i
evaluation for the initiative.
Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through
Systems of Care Grant Cluster — An Overview (PPT - 160 KB) This PowerPoint presentation from July 2006 provides information on lessons learned from the grantees and from the Center's technical support and
evaluation efforts.
The
Systems of Care grant communities and the National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for Systems of Care have developed a wide range of family involvement resources reflecting evaluation findings, position qualifications, program implementation tips,
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care have developed a wide range
of family involvement resources reflecting
evaluation findings, position qualifications, program implementation tips,
evaluation findings, position qualifications, program implementation tips, and more.
The Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center (the Center) provides programmatic and evaluation technical assistance to recipients of cooperative agreements from the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through Systems of Care demonstration i
Evaluation Center (the Center) provides programmatic and
evaluation technical assistance to recipients of cooperative agreements from the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through Systems of Care demonstration i
evaluation technical assistance to recipients
of cooperative agreements from the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through
Systems of Care demonstration initiative.
Building Family Capacity For Family Involvement in Child Welfare (PDF - 449 KB) Action Brief National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care, 2011 Describes steps and strategies that child welfare agencies can use to engage and support family members and build their capacity for meaningful family involvement.
Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through
Systems of Care: Systems of Care: Guide for Strategic Planning Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Provides information and materials on procedures any community can use to support the planning and development process for designing a system of c
Care:
Systems of Care: Guide for Strategic Planning Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Provides information and materials on procedures any community can use to support the planning and development process for designing a system of c
Care: Guide for Strategic Planning Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Provides information and materials on procedures any community can use to support the planning and development process for designing a system of c
Care, Children's Bureau (HHS)(2007) View Abstract and Document Provides information and materials on procedures any community can use to support the planning and development process for designing a
system of carecare.
Measurements were two questions from the Primary
Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders patient questionnaire, both the long and short forms
of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, both the long and short forms
of the Beck Depression Inventory, the Symptom - Driven Diagnostic
System for Primary
Care, the Medical Outcomes Study depression measure, and the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule.
Automating guidelines and scoring
of screening measures, providing decision support that is integrated into electronic health records, and providing patients with opportunities for greater participation in their health
care via portals into their electronic medical record have already shown promise.66, 67 Paper - and - pencil screening methods will need to be transformed into Web - based versions, smartphone apps, and waiting room tablets to successfully harness available technology.65, 68 These changes will be critical areas needing further
evaluation to determine best practices.69 Additional
system challenges that will need to be addressed are included in Appendix 2.
Early adolescents in
care / Early treatment goals / ECD principles / Ecological perspective (1) / Ecological perspective (2) / Ecological
systems theory / Ecology
of a
caring environment / The excluded as not addressable individuals / The experience
of the children / A Changing Vision
of Education / Educating / Educating street children / Education / Education and autonomy / Education and therapy / Educational diagnosis / Educational environments in
care / Effective communication / Effective intervention / Effective residential group
care / Effective teamwork / Effects
of intervention / Effects
of maltreatment / Effects
of residential
care / Effects
of residential group
care / Effects
of residential schooling / Ego breakdown / Ego control / Ego disorganization (1) / Ego disorganisation (2) / Elusive family (1) / Elusive family (2) / Emotional abuse / Emotions / Emotions and adolescence / Empathising / Empathy / Empowerment (1) / Empowerment (2) / Empowerment (3) / Encouragement / Engaging / Enjoyment / Environment at Summerhill School / Environments
of respect / Equality / Escape from Freedom / Establishing a relationship / Establishing the relationship / Eternal umbilicus / Ethical decision making / Ethical development / Ethical practice / Ethics / Ethics and legislation / Ethics in practice / Ethics
of treatment / European historical view / Evaluating outcome / Evaluating treatment /
Evaluation (1) /
Evaluation (2) /
Evaluation (3) / Everyday events / Everyday life events (1) / Everyday life events (2) / Excerpt / Excluding parents / Exclusion (1) / Exclusion (2) / Experience
of a foster child / Experience
of group
care / Experiences
of adoption / Externalizing behavior problems / Extracts on empathy
A Closer Look National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care A series
of reports summarizing the work
of the nine grantee communities in the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through
Systems of Care demonstration initiative.
Building and Sustaining Child Welfare Partnerships (PDF - 595 KB) National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care (2011) Highlights the importance
of interagency collaborations and community partnerships and describes steps and strategies that child welfare agencies can use to forge partnerships with child - and family - serving organizations and communitymembers.
Transforming
Systems for Parental Depression and Early Childhood Developmental Delays: Findings and Lessons Learned From the Helping Families Raise Healthy Children Initiative (PDF - 1,567 KB) Schultz, Reynolds, Sontag - Padilla, Lovejoy, Firth, & Pincus (2013) RAND Corporation Discusses the findings
of an
evaluation of the Helping Families Raise Healthy Children initiative, the fourth phase
of the Allegheny County Maternal and Child Health
Care Collaborative's efforts to implement changes in the local system of maternal and child health c
Care Collaborative's efforts to implement changes in the local
system of maternal and child health
carecare.
A
system of data collection and
evaluation to monitor the recruitment and retention
of trained ECEs across the varying programs currently being delivered to support early childhood education and child
care.
Kinship Support Services in California: An
Evaluation of California's Kinship Support Services Program (PDF - 708 KB) Shlonsky, Choi, Piccus, Cardona, & Needell (2004) Highlights findings from the ongoing evaluation of the Kinship Support Services Program, which was designed to support the well - being of California children in formal kinship placements and to minimize the number of children in informal kinship care entering the child welfa
Evaluation of California's Kinship Support Services Program (PDF - 708 KB) Shlonsky, Choi, Piccus, Cardona, & Needell (2004) Highlights findings from the ongoing
evaluation of the Kinship Support Services Program, which was designed to support the well - being of California children in formal kinship placements and to minimize the number of children in informal kinship care entering the child welfa
evaluation of the Kinship Support Services Program, which was designed to support the well - being
of California children in formal kinship placements and to minimize the number
of children in informal kinship
care entering the child welfare
system.
In Trauma - Informed
Care for Children in the Child Welfare
System: An Initial
Evaluation of a Trauma - Informed Parenting Workshop (Child Maltreatment, May 2016, 21 (2), 147 - 155), Sullivan et al. conducts an initial evaluation of a parent workshop for resource parents that incorporates a trauma - informed pe
Evaluation of a Trauma - Informed Parenting Workshop (Child Maltreatment, May 2016, 21 (2), 147 - 155), Sullivan et al. conducts an initial
evaluation of a parent workshop for resource parents that incorporates a trauma - informed pe
evaluation of a parent workshop for resource parents that incorporates a trauma - informed perspective.
The first part
of the answer lies in the professional training that child and youth
care workers receive in communications, counselling, family
systems, program planning, delivery and
evaluation, and other related courses.
Specifically, the Center will study three primary focus areas: the relationship between stress, neurobiology, and genetics and drug abuse, the role
of fathers in the child welfare
system, and an economic
evaluation of a set
of child welfare costs related specifically to the placement
of children in out -
of - home
care.
Contra Costa County used
systems of care committed funds to help develop and improve the internal
evaluation team, as well as bring in external evaluators.
The overall goals
of the
evaluation research were to validate the quality rating
system and describe the experiences
of child
care providers, parents, and children with this new program as it was implemented.
Family Involvement in the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through
Systems of Care Initiative (PDF - 716 KB) National Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care (2010) Describes the planning process and implementation of family involvement at the case, peer, and systems levels and identifies lessons learned and recommendations to enhance implementation of future family involvement efforts in child w
Systems of Care Initiative (PDF - 716 KB) National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for
Systems of Care (2010) Describes the planning process and implementation of family involvement at the case, peer, and systems levels and identifies lessons learned and recommendations to enhance implementation of future family involvement efforts in child w
Systems of Care (2010) Describes the planning process and implementation
of family involvement at the case, peer, and
systems levels and identifies lessons learned and recommendations to enhance implementation of future family involvement efforts in child w
systems levels and identifies lessons learned and recommendations to enhance implementation
of future family involvement efforts in child welfare.
Presenters: Presenters include Jennifer Marcelli, the Center's Program Area Manager for the Foster
Care and Permanency focus area; Taffy Compain, National Foster
Care Specialist at the Children's Bureau; Chrissy Triplett, the Project Manager with the Catawba County Child Wellbeing Project, Inc.; Heather Ball, the
Evaluation Coordinator for the Child Wellbeing Project, Inc.; Phillip H. Redmond, Jr., Associate Director of the Child Care Division at the Duke Endowment; Karin Malm, a child welfare research and evaluation specialist; and a birth parent with firsthand experience with the child welfa
Evaluation Coordinator for the Child Wellbeing Project, Inc.; Phillip H. Redmond, Jr., Associate Director
of the Child
Care Division at the Duke Endowment; Karin Malm, a child welfare research and
evaluation specialist; and a birth parent with firsthand experience with the child welfa
evaluation specialist; and a birth parent with firsthand experience with the child welfare
system.
In addition, the National Technical Assistance and
Evaluation Center for Child Welfare Systems of Care Grantees was created to support the grantees through programmatic and evaluation technical assistance, research, and
Evaluation Center for Child Welfare
Systems of Care Grantees was created to support the grantees through programmatic and
evaluation technical assistance, research, and
evaluation technical assistance, research, and training.
The main focus
of research is on the Out -
of - Home
Care system, including projects that explore the profiles, needs and developmental trajectories of children and young people in care; projects that investigate outcomes linked to child and adolescent well - being; and program evaluati
Care system, including projects that explore the profiles, needs and developmental trajectories
of children and young people in
care; projects that investigate outcomes linked to child and adolescent well - being; and program evaluati
care; projects that investigate outcomes linked to child and adolescent well - being; and program
evaluations.
Her recent work involves improving the well - being
of children who exit the foster
care system and the
evaluation of a professional development
system anchored in an online Associates degree for infant and toddler teachers for the Office
of Head Start.
The focus
of her current work is on maternal and infant home visiting
evaluation, dissemination, and implementation research and the role
of home visiting within early childhood
systems of care.
Melissa Colón is a research analyst for the Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative implementation
evaluation, where she is examining the structure and development
of systems of care for families with young children in high - need communities.
In this
evaluation of the Multidimensional Treatment Foster
Care — Adolescents (MTFC — A) program conducted by Chamberlain and Reid (1998), 85 boys referred for community placement in the juvenile justice
system were randomly assigned to either MTFC — A or Group
Care (GC).
As a Researcher at Chapin Hall, Byers collaborates on studies that include
system - focused
evaluation of child welfare, pediatric primary
care, and early childhood service
systems.
SECTION 1115 WAIVER A statutory provision that allows a State to operate its
system of care for Medicaid enrollees in a manner different from that proscribed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), in an attempt to demonstrate the efficacy and cost - effectiveness
of an alternative delivery
system through research and
evaluation.
The
evaluation takes place at multiple levels: individual outcomes, program processes, community capacity and
systems of care, and state
systems and sustainability.