Not exact matches
According to the
true Christian
doctrine, there should be no hierarchy in the Christian
Church.
The
true Church does not get its
doctrine from those at the bottom.
A lot of
churches believe in order to be considered a
true Christian, you have to also accept the
doctrine of the Trinity.
The writer to this article is not a very informed or intelligent individual and anyone who judges the LDS
church by the polygamist
doctrine is missing out on a
true and virtuous, motivating, and service oriented religion, and is ultimately rejecting the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Most disagree with the practices, interpretation and
doctrine of the other sects and many consider anyone who isn't in their particular
church as «not
true Christians».
I know of no current
church body, which keeps the
true doctrine.
This was
true even for those who had no interest in
church doctrines or worship.
Maybe some Russian or some Greek
churches keep the
true doctrine.
Argues coherently and logically that the
doctrine of Infallibility must be an essential element of the
true Church of Christ.
My definition of «
church» has definitely changed over the years, and I find myself leaning more and more toward the idea that the
true bride of Christ is a group of living breathing people — not a building, not an organization, not a set of
doctrines, etc. — just people who continue on the path toward faith in God.
The factors of chief importance in the development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the tradition of religious thought in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience of Christ and conviction about his person, mission, and nature — this soon became the tradition of the faith or the «
true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience of Christ — only in theory to be distinguished from the preceding — in worship, in preaching, in teaching, in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation of the present Spiritual Christ within his
church.
And the
Church must be allowed to be
true to herself — to preach Christian
doctrine and Christian morality, in and out of season.
The
church, it is
true, has always had to find ways of protecting its
doctrine.
According to the document «Towards Common Witness» some of the characteristics which distinguish proselytism from Christian witness are: unfair criticism of caricaturing of the
doctrines, beliefs and practices of another
church; presenting one's
church or confession as «the
true church»; the use of humanitarian aid, educational opportunities or moral and psychological pressure, to induce people to change their affiliation; exploiting people's loneliness, even disillusionment with their own
church in order to «convert» them.
For him this
doctrine is not only the fundamental discriminator whereby one discerns the «
true Christian» but also the universal teaching of the Christian
church — at least prior to the rise of biblical criticism.
I think we agree on the fact that it is by faith that all are saved i have no problem with that and its in that that there is unity.You find within any christian modern
church law can be mixed with Grace that is not peculiar to any domination maybe it is more extreme in some.Where there are believers there are works of the flesh such as pride and self reliance.I was thinking today the word says if we believe in our hearts and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord then you shall be saved.Its not a hard
doctrine to believe thats in its basic form.The seventh day have tacked on to that belief adherence to the sabbath that is sadly how denominations spring up.In the anglican
church we still recite the apostles creed how many
church still do that today as a basis for there faith in Jesus Christ.Your statement that some are saved is just as
true to those who go to modern christian
churchs who say they are christian but walk according to the flesh..
Were there no such thing as inspiration, Christianity would be
true, and all its essential
doctrines would be credibly witnessed to us in the generally trustworthy reports of the teaching of our Lord and of His authoritative agents in founding the
Church, preserved in the writings of the apostles and their first followers....
The vocation of St. John as the apostle of the Divinity of Christ's one person has fed and powered the
true development of the
doctrine of the
Church at all times, not least in the first centuries in which the
true doctrine of both the divinity and the humanity are hammered out in great Councils, and the concepts are refined in the fires of contrary heresy against either the full Divinity or the full Humanity of Christ.
Now having said that, this ex-communication is an opportunity for Kelly to break free of the chains of pride, deception, and false
doctrine that bound her in the Mormon
church, and to be open to hearing the
true nature of Christ and her inability to please God by any works of her own.
True, it goes without saying that if a man can not in conscience accept the
doctrine of the
Church as the norm of his faith, this must be respected by others, whether they think his view right or not; and the
Church, too, must respect such a conviction and may not suppress it by social pressures or prevent its expression.
This reality makes us aware that every narrow definition of Christian doctrinal certainty will finally have to be abandoned; every claim by any branch of the Christian
church to be the
true church or the only
church will ultimately have to be sacrificed; every
doctrine of infallibility — whether of the papacy, or of the Scriptures, or of any sacred tradition, or of any individual experience — will inevitably have to be forgotten.
We must expect today, when we all know that a new era has begun in the history of human civilisation, that if the religion of Christ is
true, and is founded upon the only claim which makes Christianity the hope of mankind - upon the Divinity personal and unambiguous of Jesus Christ - that we will find within the bosom of the
Church's
doctrine all that we need to fire the world anew, and to restore all things in Christ.
The
Church teaches the truth of the Virgin Birth and the truth of Mary's Immaculate Conception; both
doctrines are
true, but the Virgin Birth is closer to the Paschal Mystery than is the Immaculate Conception.
That this omission had consequences in the life of the
Church is apparent from the diversity of
doctrines — not all of which can possibly be
true — that have been drawn from Paul's words.
The reason can be found in the document's preface where it insists that religious freedom «leaves untouched traditional Catholic
doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the
true religion and toward the one
Church of Christ» (s. 1).
If teachers of status, whether priests or layfolk, do not accept themselves and do not teach to others the
doctrine of life and human goodness that Jesus taught on earth and still teaches in His
Church, they will not form within others the
true identity of the real, the living Jesus.
In fact we would argue that
true development of
doctrine, including the social teaching of the
Church, is only possible on the basis of the orthodox doctrinal and spiritual principles.
Likewise against the Manichees in the matter of the goodness of sexual desire and function, and against the Pelagians in the matter of its perfection and the need of inner grace to attain that perfection, Augustine gave again to the
Church a synthesis of divine and human reasoning which the
Church in his day, and for a thousand years and more afterwards, recognised as
true in fact to the consequences of her
doctrine.
He presented to the
Church of his day, after much dialogue and discussion, a
doctrine of Original Sin which the
Church recognised as
true in all essentials to what she did in fact believe.
The REAL
Church is the heart of man, receiving our LORD's HOLY SPIRIT,
true acceptance of GOD's saving GRACE would mean turning away from false teachings, man's
doctrines and traditions.
As Anderson shows, all the best and
true Catholic reformers — whatever their political views or prudential decisions — were always strong proponents of established
Church doctrine, and fierce disciplinarians when it came to upholding
Church teaching, particularly in the area of sexual morality (a main target of today's «reformers»).
But if this is
true, then it can not now separate its
doctrines of God, Christ,
Church, and Faith from the historical development of human consciousness and the fact of cosmic evolution.
First, the
doctrine of the Protestant
Church, which is the
true one.
My current ministry is taking care of widows and orphans, ministering to those with drug & alcohol problems — in other words doing what the
true God would want; not going after the civil rights of millions of Americans — we need to keep
church separated from hate — and stop trying to deny civil rights based on perceived religious
doctrine.
The LDS
Church derives these
doctrines from its expanded canon of «scripture» that includes alleged modern revelations given to Joseph Smith, who claimed to be the Prophet through whom God restored
true Christianity to the earth.»
But it is necessary, because the Catholic
Church believes that her
doctrine on the Eucharist is
true.
To be fair... this sort of dialogue leads to two possible outcomes: 1) all
doctrine is false, 2) theRoman Catholic is the one
true Church.
true believer = loyalist to the christian
doctrine and to the christian
church who's only interest is in the preservation of the religious hierarchy.
So we teach that the
true harmony of the
church consists in
doctrines and in the
true and harmonious preaching of the Gospel of Christ, and in rites that have been expressly delivered by the Lord,
Find a
true church that does not follow man's
doctrine but follows the New Testament.
The latter two groups felt it was necessary to expound
true doctrine and to be of influence on society through the State support of the
Church.
They were now made responsible for the preservation of
true doctrine, given a more important part in the nomination of ministers, and empowered to admonish people who disregarded the
church laws.
Based on a
true story, Netflix's new film Come Sunday follows renowned pastor Carlton Pearson, played by Chiwetel Ejiofor, who puts his family and reputation at risk when he questions the
church doctrine and his own belief in a vengeful God.