Sentences with phrase «ttc employees»

While the Saskatchewan decision certain gives some support TTC employees» argument, the outcome of any legal challenge will ultimately depend on a court's analysis of the specific legislation at issue.

Freedom of association is not absolute; if the Ontario legislature can demonstrate that its essential services legislation is reasonable and justified in the circumstances, then a court may uphold the law and the TTC employees» will remain unable to strike.

The Union's case seems to be premised on the misplaced perspective that TTC employees have the right to be free from public complaints.

[137] Union counsel also submitted that the privacy of TTC employees is invaded by tweets disclosing where they are working, their employee numbers, and details of complaints about their conduct.

Thus, it is troubling to have allegations of misconduct by particular TTC employees included in tweets which can be viewed by others.

A number of those tweets also include allegations of misconduct by TTC employees.

Even if the TTC did not have a Twitter account, members of the public could take photos or videos of TTC employees and post them on - line.

On Monday, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion brought by the union representing TTC employees to block the implementation of random drug and alcohol testing of TTC employees.

Random drug testing on TTC employees will begin later this month after a judge dismissed an application from the transit workers» union for an injunction — read more...

In Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2017 ONSC 2078, the Ontario Superior Court found that the detection of drug or alcohol usage by TTC employees in safety critical positions was positive, and the implementation of the policy may act as a deterrent.

The second reason this decision takes top spot is because the complaint was not brought just by the persons who manage the Twitter account, i.e. those who job it is to hold up the target at which vitriol is hurled, but rather in respect of TTC employees mentioned via the Twitter account.

The Firm has defended a series of other young professionals charged with Domestic Assault, including bankers, pharmacists, TTC employees, construction and Municipal workers, real estate agents and even other members of the Law Society.

This is way above the average Canadian income, which is in line with Toronto's general assertions that TTC employees are well paid.

Let's say that number is up to 10,000 presently, and the mean wage of TTC employees is $ 80,000 / year.

To help TTC employees understand the «what's in it for me» for employee advocacy, custom training materials like the ones below are created.

However, as submitted by Employer counsel, a tweeter can not legitimately be said to be involved in a commercial purpose by merely taking a photo or video of a TTC employee and attaching it to a tweet.

Tweets calling a TTC employee a «fucking faggot», «brown son of a gun of a driver», or «bald white piece of shit fuck», clearly fall into that category, as do a number of others included in the Tab 1 «Derogatory Language» section of the exhibit.

[142] To bring the operation of @TTChelps into closer alignment with the letter and spirit of Section 41, and with the Section 8 recognition of the requirement that justice in relation to disciplinary matters must be done in a manner that is consistent with dignity, when @TTChelps receives a tweet alleging misconduct by a TTC employee its response should simply be that complaints can not be filed through Twitter and that customers wishing to file a complaint can do so by calling 416-393-3030 or going to ow.ly / B27pF.

As recognized by B.V.'s manager after she filed the aforementioned occurrence report, it is not appropriate for a member of the public to post a photograph of a TTC employee on @TTChelps, particularly in conjunction with an offensive tweet.

Although that contention is not supported by the evidence adduced in these proceedings, the evidence does establish that members of the public have occasionally included a photograph of a TTC employee in tweets sent to @TTChelps.

However, as submitted by Employer counsel, a TTC employee's badge number is not private information, nor is the bus number that a TTC employee is driving or the route number on which it is being driven, because in the context of an employee who works in public providing a public service, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding that information.

When the TTC tweets a response such as «sorry to hear» or «sorry for the experience», it is not indicating that a TTC employee has done anything wrong.

Not exact matches

The companies paid out $ 77.5 billion (42.1 %) in Total Tax Contribution (TTC), royalties and other fees to the government — ahead of employee payroll (28.3 %) and dividends to shareholders and business reinvestment (28.3 %).

Social advocacy (aka employee advocacy) has become the differentiating factor for many travel brands including TTC.

PostBeyond powers 5 different employee advocacy programs for TTC, including for its flagship brands Insight Vacations, Trafalgar Tours and Uniworld.

In the opening keynote and his presentation on Day Two, Dan shared how and why TTC focuses empowering employees as micro-marketers and social brand advocates.

«What's interesting is the Twitter account at issue, the TTC had very little control — if any — over the posts that were made,» Mark Mendl, partner at Baker & McKenzie LLP, says, adding this is a new direction as the vast majority of cases out there have dealt with employee posts to social media, not posts by the general public to a company - held account.

It was found that the TTC had a reasonable system of maintenance in place which required employees to monitor the transit station for hazards.

The account was administered by employees in the TTC Customer Service Department.

Following a recent fatal bus accident, the Toronto Transit Commission («TTC») has approved random drug and alcohol testing for select employees that if implemented would make the TTC the first transit agency in the country (not operating across the United States border) to carry out routine drug testing.

In upholding the TTC's decision to require employees to take random drug and alcohol tests, the Court noted that «The TTC's workplace is literally the City of Toronto and all the people who move about the city have an interest in the TTC safely taking its passengers from one place to another.»

Many of them are also violative of the Commission's Respect and Dignity Policy, which applies not only to employees but also to members of the public utilizing TTC services.

Also, a name such as «TTChelps» is a much easier target for vitriol than would be the name of the employee operating the account; the TTC is a faceless monolith, «Dave» is a human being.

The TTC and its employees provide a fundamental public service which is at least partially paid for by tax dollars.

Union counsel's assertion that the TTC enlists the public to perform surveillance on its employees is preposterous and unsupported by any evidence whatsoever.

That section provides a procedure which must be followed in the investigation of complaints received by the TTC from the public regarding the conduct of a Commission Transportation or Maintenance employee.

[133] It is clear from the totality of the evidence that the TTC has failed to take all reasonable and practical measures to protect bargaining unit employees from that type of harassment by members of the community, as required by the HRC, the Agreement, and the Workplace Harassment Policy.

Although it permits verbal complaints to be made, it requires that they be set out in writing by the complainant in the form of a «letter / signed statement» forwarded to the TTC's Marketing and Public Affairs Department within twenty - one normal working days of the incident in question, unless the complaint involves allegations of a criminal nature or violations of Section 8 of the Agreement, or unless during the interview process the employee agrees with the substance of the complaint.

There would be no benefit to having a TTC policy regarding members of the public taking videos of employees, as this is out of the TTC's control.

Similarly, in its Workplace Harassment Policy, the TTC recognized its obligation to protect all employees from harassment that contravenes the Ontario Human Rights Code, and its obligation to take all reasonable and practical measures to protect employees from harassment by members of the community.

Random drug and alcohol testing for most Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) employees can proceed following a decision of Justice Marrocco denying the ATU Local 113's application for an injunction earlier this week.

The ruling permits the TTC to test 10,000 of its 14,000 employees, including those deemed to be in «safety - sensitive» jobs, as well as those in designated management positions and all executives (including CEO Andy Byford) under the TTC's Fitness for Duty Policy (the Policy).

As can be seen from the recent decision in Amalgamated Transit Union v. TTC (motion for interlocutory injunction), a chasm exists between management and labour in relation to the rights of employer and employee regarding this issue.