Sentences with phrase «tamino post»

I really tried, but I can't find the Tamino post in the Google cache, nor at archive.org (for some reason archive.org has a huge gap between July 2007 and Februray 2008).

The no - dendro reconstruction was breathlessly reported at realclimate (a post subsequently used as authority by the recent Tamino post):

I saw the recent Tamino post.

Since you were interested in the Tamino post, I put together my «chumming» method for comparing reconstructions.

The Tamino post is a great antidote; it's dismaying seeing how strongly the «global warming has stopped» stuff has got hold of even key mainstream news outlets...

McKinney gave a response to the Tamino post suggesting that the satellite data also has major problems, that seems to be a minority opinion.

(I seem to remember there being a Tamino post illustrating this but I can't find it)

See the recent Tamino post for more information.

Note that Tamino posted the only two test results which agree with his hypothesis, while ignoring the vast majority of indicators pointing to the presence of a unit root:

Compare the location of my 1979 - 97 line relative to the data points with the chart Tamino posted.

Not exact matches

You might also be interested in Tamino's very interesting post (Open Mind) on the long running Central England Temperature record.

-- WhatsUpWithThat — specifically the Basil Copeland / Anthony Watts series of posts on solar cycles [the basis of which was demolished by Tamino].

Judith Curry: Too bad Tamino's review was posted during a period when I don't have much time to put into blogging.

My views are very much in agreement with Tamino in post 4.

Actually I think tamino provided a very good service in allowing sheldon to post though I'm not sure he himself thinks so.

Regarding my promised reply to Lazar # 287 I will post at Bishophill on the Tamino thread — I am sure that any comments Lazar may wish to make there in response to my answers will be posted in full and received with great interest.

Update:: Tamino has a post up detailing exactly the problems with the AMO paper that struck me when I read it.

I think we need Tamino to do a statistical analysis of how quickly Judith Curry has a new post on her blog, after Gavin and company do a take down of something she has just written on there, compared with how often she posts on her blog generally... Judging by the comments on both her blog and Real Climate, it appears she had a new post up only three hours after Gavin posted his take down of her!

Using either record in the same analysis as shown in the last figure would give the same result — that there is no practical or statistical evidence that there has been a change in the underlying long - term trend (see Tamino's post on this as well).

I was going to mention tamino's post there... but discovered that the Dark Lord of Wikipedia (or something similar) otherwise known as WMC was too quick and had already done so.

-- WhatsUpWithThat — specifically the Basil Copeland / Anthony Watts series of posts on solar cycles [the basis of which was demolished by Tamino].

Sooner or later, that will get updated... and it will certainly include a link to tamino's post...

«As you can see, Tamino's post is dated March, 2016.

And yet the same reputable Tamino seems to be engaged in a similar «fool's errand» in trying to predict future Arctic Sea Ice Extent in his recent post:

The discussion at Open Mind on Shelby County shows how a mere tinkering (as I hope tamino doesn't mind me calling the post relative to the GHCN QC effort) can raise possible errors and show which stations would be flagged for further investigation.

It's therefor rather amusing that, having given up on the older strategies, focusing either on the invocation of various explanatory «forcings» or else, as in a blatantly misleading post by Tamino, questioning the logic behind the evidence for a pause, the latest efforts have taken the form of attempts to actually alter the data itself.

Response to 1 — wili: If you read Tamino's blog post... He is trying it out for fun, and to get some feel for the timescales involved.

Trouble is the results are on an old comment thread at Tamino's place, and the post is no longer accessible, so I'm working from memory.

I am not smart enough to post on Tamino's site http://tamino.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/temperature-variability-part-2/ or maybe it is closed to comments now.

Also Tamino's site contains at least one excellent post on this.

Well summarized, and along with Tamino's statistical post a good complement to the new Karl et al. paper.

I think Tamino once had a post called «Keep it simple, stupid» saying much the same.

[Update, July 29, 11:30 a.m. Some climate bloggers, led by «Tamino», have harshly criticized me for thinking I am qualified to post a review comment pointing to studies that appear to contradict the «superstorm» argument in the new draft paper by James Hansen and others.

Addendum, July 29, 11:30 a.m. Some climate bloggers, led by «Tamino», have harshly criticized me for thinking I am qualified to post a review comment pointing to studies that appear to contradict the «superstorm» argument in the paper.

(Tamino has a good post on this as well).

[April 1, 9:25 a.m. Insert They also helpfully point to three illuminating posts on the paper at the Open Mind blog (by «Tamino»).]

I suggest you contact Dr. Church or Dr. White (or Tamino, as this is his post) for advice.

I note that, in contemporary comments at Tamino (where you posted at the time), you did not state that you believed that NASA software was incapable of «fixing» such inhomogeneities.

On August 3 (10:46 am Eastern), I had published a post entitled Hansen's Y2K Error in which I observed a previously unreported «Y2K error» in GISS USHCN conclusively disproved efforts by Eli Rabett (for example, here) and Tamino to discredit Anthony Watts» surface stations project on the basis that NASA software could «fix» inhomogeneous station data.

The situation needs to be brought to the public and politicians and through posts such as yours and others at SkS (and RealClimate.org, Tamino, and others) are helping.

Cf. Tamino's recent excellent post comparing to previous larger - than - trend periods in the record - we should expect variability.

As Tamino shows here (and in several other posts) winter max has been declining in recent years.

I suggest you read Greg Laden's post about global warming getting worse, and Tamino's post about the faux pause.

AddendumAddendum, July 29, 11:30 a.m. Some climate bloggers, led by «Tamino», have harshly criticized me for thinking I am qualified to post a review comment pointing to studies that appear to contradict the «superstorm» argument in the paper.

[DC: I have posted in the past on this subject (specifically, three posts on the UAH annual cycle), but perhaps you are thinking of my more recent comments at Tamino's Open Mind.

Both posts were made only to respond to Tamino's response to me, and deleting them is dishonest.

Phil, Tamino's site tells you if your post is waiting for the moderator.

There can be no doubt Tamino intentionally deleted posts that would be damaging to him.

Tamino has a new and unusually good — even by his high standards — post on why there is no «hiatus» even in atmospheric global temperatures.

It's also what Tamino did here in this excellent post.