Go read
the Tamino thread devoted to Dan H's obsfucation.
Regarding my promised reply to Lazar # 287 I will post at Bishophill on
the Tamino thread — I am sure that any comments Lazar may wish to make there in response to my answers will be posted in full and received with great interest.
Not exact matches
The
thread at
Tamino's is comments on the draft.
tamino March 3, 2018 at 12:22 pm It's time for this
thread to come to an end.
At
Tamino's Open Mind, Doc Snow shared a photo link which may be relevant to this
thread, since the reactor site seems to be pretty much at sea level, out into the ocean (Pictures can be helpful):
Trouble is the results are on an old comment
thread at
Tamino's place, and the post is no longer accessible, so I'm working from memory.
Tamino at his blog «Open Mind» directed me to this
thread to ask a question here that I have been asking on «Open Mind».
I did send a thank you over to
Tamino on his open
thread for finding my error (we'll see if it gets accepted).
If you go to
Tamino's
thread (previously linked) the next to last graph (easiest to read) shows sea level as -160 mm in 1880 and +70 mm in 2013.
[DB] «As far as the CET /
Tamino projections the
thread has vanished (sadly missed) but I kept a note of the comments»
How «best» to do this is discussed at
Tamino's and Lucia's
thread.
For the record, the equation that both Beeson and I are using comes originally (I believe) from Rick Baartman, on a
thread over at
Tamino's place:
I would also add that
Tamino has over time deleted larges swaths of posts and complete
threads that put him in a bad light, possibly even to avoid legal repercussions for libeling two prominent scientists (Ben Hermann?)
This is something that came up way up this
thread as well, and that
Tamino also highlighted: In testing for unit root you have to account for the underlying trend.