Sentences with phrase «tamino wrote»

What Tamino wrote down is complete nonsense, statistically speaking.
Tamino wrote about the same errors several days later than McIntyre and gave a terribly bad excuse for not referring to him.
A brief perusal of the literature should make it clear that a great many climate scientists have accepted the hiatus as real, and as a problem, and a great many hypotheses have been published in various efforts to account for it (including a paper Tamino wrote with Stefan Rahmstorf, as I'm sure you are all aware).

Not exact matches

«Peering over his shoulder, we discovered that he had written «I have overcome my fear of writing, just like Tamino in The Magic Flute.»»
In 144 I used the phrase «temperature extremes have gotten enormously hotter» which I meant as a paraphrase of Tamino who wrote: «any way you slice it severe hot outliers are increasing.»
I think we need Tamino to do a statistical analysis of how quickly Judith Curry has a new post on her blog, after Gavin and company do a take down of something she has just written on there, compared with how often she posts on her blog generally... Judging by the comments on both her blog and Real Climate, it appears she had a new post up only three hours after Gavin posted his take down of her!
Many of the comments following the articles, particularly those written by regulars (Ray Ladbury, BLP, Tamino, Hank, and many others) are likewise written by folk who know what they are writing about, and can convey their understanding to others.
Timothy Chase writes in 142: Of course contrarians will point out that instruments at poorer sites will have a bias, but as tamino (# 91) points out, this bias is corrected for, and it is quite possible that given the methodology employed, removing the urban sites would actually result in a higher average temperature, and as Hansen points out (see tamino's first reference in # 93), the bias introduced by urban sites is quite negligible.
While I do think that what John N - G and Tamino have written makes sense, I don't think that these conclusions are based on strong analysis.
And the paper that Tamino (a statistician) recently wrote with some climate scientists.
Quite self - evidently, all those things were indeed done (and Tamino's analysis of Marcott has been extended further since those words were written.)
Tamino, you wrote a long time ago a post on PDO, remarking on the connection between ENSO and PDO, and promising an imminent follow - up, which was interrupted by posts on Australian drought.
Tamino's action suggestion, «politicians who deny the reality, human causation, and danger of global warming should be voted out of office» should be written on every wall and as a ceterum censeo added after every speech.
Self - described «Hansen bulldog» Tamino, writing at NASA's realclimate blog hosted by Hansen's other bulldog (Gavin), wrote: As another example, Montford makes the claim that if you eliminate just two of the proxies used for the MBH98 reconstruction since 1400, the Stahle and NOAMER PC1 series, «you got a completely different result — the Medieval Warm -LSB-...]
Grant Foster (aka Tamino) obviously wrote the research rebuttal article and he then passed it on to others who placed their stamp of approval on it.
Walker's annoyance was such that he «started to write an article to document his [Tamino's] many errors.»
Tamino, I see that the article in the Daily Mail was written by David Rose.
There's one problem with your write - up, Tamino.
Over at Tamino's place VS wrote: «Look at the temeprature series over the past couple [hundred] of thousand of years.
About Tamino, he wrote down things that were plain wrong, and I still firmly stand by that.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z