Dr. Robert Marzano expresses concerns about the inaccurate association of his name with other classroom walkthrough and
teacher observation systems.
See, for example, Table 1 on p. 98 of the article to see if what they have included within the list of components of such new and «complex, elaborate
teacher observation systems systems» is actually new or much different than most of the observational systems in use prior.
Teacher observation systems, which are increasingly used to measure teacher effectiveness, also tend to vary in how they assess teachers in meeting the needs of English language learner students.
Not exact matches
But in recent weeks, Cuomo has indicated he will begin to emphasize a new direction in education after a legislative session that saw yet more changes to the state's
teacher evaluation
system that linked performance reviews to tenure as well as student test scores and in - classroom
observation.
ALBANY — The final plan for a new statewide
teacher evaluation
system will require
observations by an «independent» evaluator, a Cuomo administration official said during a briefing with reporters late Monday.
The budget also created a new
teacher evaluation
system that relies on a mix of in - classroom
observation and at least one standardized test to assess performance.
The move comes after NYSUT pushed back this year against efforts by Gov. Andrew Cuomo to overhaul the state's
teacher evaluation
system, with the performance evaluations linked to both standardized test results and in - classroom
observation, while also making it more difficult for
teachers to obtain and keep tenure.
Cuomo's proposal seeks to limit the number of
teachers who receive high ratings under the
system, since the subjective
observations component is seen as an area where administrators have the opportunity to inflate
teachers» scores.
Principals or
teachers who perform
observations for the purpose of the state's
teacher evaluation
system may count those hours toward the total.
The negotiations, which both sides agreed to in writing, were aimed at creating a
system for fairly evaluating
teachers, using both student performance and
observation, in the 33 schools receiving federal school improvement grants.
Four - out - of - five New York City voters (80 %) support a new
teacher evaluation
system based on both classroom
observations and test scores, with 56 % supporting such a
system strongly.
The New York Daily News reports on our poll that found that 80 % of NYC voters support a new
teacher evaluation
system based on both classroom
observations and test scores.
The New York Daily News blog reports on StudentsFirstNY's recent poll that found that 80 % of NYC voters support a new
teacher evaluation
system based on both classroom
observations and test scores.
Whatever the parties negotiate or King decides, the evaluation
system will be based 20 percent on standardized test scores when applicable, 20 percent on other evidence of student learning and 60 percent on classroom
observation and other measures of
teacher effectiveness, in keeping with the 2010 state law on
teacher evaluation.
The new evaluation
system will provide clear standards and significant guidance to local school districts for implementation of
teacher evaluations based on multiple measures of performance including student achievement and rigorous classroom
observations.
The research team measured
teacher - child interactions at the start and end of the program using the Classroom Assessment Scoring
System (CLASS), an
observation tool with three components: emotional support, classroom organization, and instructional support.
Among the fruits of those efforts was an update to the component weighting in the
teacher - evaluation
system, which now caps value - added at 35 percent and weights classroom
observations at 40 percent.
My
observations of the Finnish education
system match those of Kurt and Gavin's: it's about quality
teachers, personalised learning and formative assessment.
After extensive research on
teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide
teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom
observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring
System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of
teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multiple years.
Traditionally,
teacher evaluation
systems relied heavily on classroom
observations conducted by principals or other school administrators, sometimes with the help of rubrics or checklists.
A study published in Education Next by Eric Taylor and John Tyler found that
teacher evaluation
systems that include high - quality classroom
observations can improve the effectiveness of individual
teachers.
Performance - based accountability evaluates
teachers» effectiveness through a comprehensive, research - based
system that combines such criteria as position responsibilities, classroom
observations, and students» gains in test scores.
The authors point out that the Cincinnati
system of evaluation is different from the standard practice in place in most American school districts, where perfunctory evaluations assign the vast majority of
teachers «satisfactory» ratings, leading many to «characterize classroom
observation as a hopelessly flawed approach to assessing
teacher effectiveness.»
The bias in classroom
observation systems that derives from some
teachers being assigned much more able students than other
teachers is very important to the overall performance of the
teacher evaluation
system.
These new
systems depend primarily on two types of measurements: student test score gains on statewide assessments in math and reading in grades 4 - 8 that can be uniquely associated with individual
teachers; and systematic classroom
observations of
teachers by school leaders and central staff.
While all
teachers are supposed to be observed as part of the state's
teacher assessment
system, the reading initiative and programs like Success for All have created an environment that makes
observation and monitoring a normal part of daily life for
teachers.
Several studies, including our own, clearly demonstrate that
teacher evaluation
systems that are based on a number of components, such as classroom
observation scores and test - score gains, are already much more effective at predicting future
teacher performance than paper credentials and years of experience.
New
teacher evaluation
systems represent a significant improvement over the bad old days of every
teacher getting a satisfactory rating based on a cursory
observation by their principal.
Teachers» scores on the classroom
observation components of Cincinnati's evaluation
system reliably predict the achievement gains made by their students in both math and reading.
Focusing on the
systems as a whole also would have encouraged districts to be more honest in their
observation ratings rather than creating the incentive for subjective
observation ratings to compensate for value - added results that, by definition, grade
teachers on a curve.
What is notable about the version of
teacher evaluation
systems currently evolving in districts throughout the nation, however, is the continued emphasis on classroom
observations, with many
systems employing the same
observation tool used in CPS under the EITP initiative.
We examine a unique intervention in Chicago Public Schools (CPS) to uncover the causal impact on school performance of an evaluation
system based on highly structured classroom
observations of
teacher practice.
In the 2000 — 01 school year, Cincinnati launched the
Teacher Evaluation
System (TES) in which
teachers» performance in and out of the classroom is assessed through classroom
observations and a review of work products.
The administration will allow states greater flexibility to use other
teacher - evaluation methods, such as student and parent surveys and
observation and feedback
systems.
While this approach contrasts starkly with status quo «principal walk - through» styles of class
observation, its use is on the rise in new and proposed evaluation
systems in which rigorous classroom
observation is often combined with other measures, such as
teacher value - added based on student test scores.
Now Tomberlin is working with
teachers on several areas that could be included in the evaluation
system: content pedagogy, participation in professional learning communities, student surveys,
teacher work product,
teacher observation, student learning objectives, and value - added measures to determine if students have achieved a year's work in their subject.
To assess this broad array, an evaluation
system might leverage classroom
observations, tests and school records, as well as surveys of students, other
teachers, and administrators.
Cambridge, MA (October 5, 2015)-- On October 5, researchers at the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University will release findings from the Best Foot Forward project, an initiative testing whether video technology can help address the challenges faced by
teachers and school leaders in implementing classroom
observations that are part of
teacher evaluation
systems.
The old
system consisted of annual
teacher observations done by principals.
The Texas
Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T - TESS) supports teacher instruction and student performance through multiple measures that include teacher observations, self - reflection and goal setting and student
Teacher Evaluation and Support
System (T - TESS) supports
teacher instruction and student performance through multiple measures that include teacher observations, self - reflection and goal setting and student
teacher instruction and student performance through multiple measures that include
teacher observations, self - reflection and goal setting and student
teacher observations, self - reflection and goal setting and student growth.
Jason Kamras, deputy to D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee in charge of human capital, talks with Education Next about the new
teacher evaluation
system put in place in D.C. Beginning this year,
teachers in D.C. will be evaluated based on student test scores (when available) and classroom
observations (by principals and master educators), and poorly performing
teachers may be fired, regardless of tenure.
These new
systems, we're told by our erstwhile comrades - in - arms, have infuriated
teachers, corrupted the formative nature of
observations, and so much more.
A study published in the Winter 2015 issue of Education Next, «Getting Classroom
Observations Right: Lessons on How from Four Pioneering Districts,» looked at the strengths and weaknesses of different
teacher evaluation
systems.
This collaboration has helped jump - start this work across the state and shed light on the many significant challenges associated with overhauling the hoary
systems in place, such as measuring student achievement in «untested» grades and subjects, ensuring inter-rater agreement and accuracy of
teacher practice
observations, and ending the long - standing culture of «The Widget Effect.»
An earlier study published by Education Next looked at whether an evaluation
system based on classroom
observations performed by trained professionals could identify the
teachers whose students demonstrate the largest learning gains.
To ensure that all observers are on the same page in their ability to identify and rate
observations with consistency, Learning Sciences suggests that within any
system of
observation observers take the time to view
teacher practice together and then discuss what each person observed.
Cincinnati's merit pay plan, proposed in 2002, was overwhelmingly voted down by
teachers (1892 to 73), even though the program did not base bonuses on student test scores, but rather on a multifaceted evaluation
system that included classroom
observations by professional peers and administrators and portfolios of lesson plans and student work.
They must also create comprehensive
systems of
teacher and principal development, evaluation and support that include factors beyond test scores, such as principal
observation, peer review, student work, or parent and student feedback... they must set new performance targets for improving student achievement and closing achievement gaps.
Established in the 2009 - 10 school year, D.C.'s IMPACT evaluation
system relies on a complex mix of factors to score each
teacher, including both multiple
observations and measures of student achievement.
While
observation systems themselves are part of a plan for systematic
teacher improvement, there are interconnecting processes that should also be improving systematically.