Not exact matches
Also, the California State
Test scores were
often not available until the end of summer or after school started and couldn't be used by
teachers to help them make placement decisions.
Breastfed children had higher mean scores on
tests of cognitive ability; performed better on standardized
tests of reading, mathematics, and scholastic ability; were rated as performing better in reading and mathematics by their class
teachers; had higher levels of achievement in school - leaving examinations; and less
often left school without educational qualifications.
«Trusting
teachers and freeing them up from the daily grind of targets,
testing and inspections that change as
often as the weather will ensure that there is more time spent on what
teachers do best, providing a stimulating and fulfilling experience for all our youngsters ensuring success and interest in the classroom and beyond»
The focus has
often been on the role of standardized
tests in
teacher evaluations.
But opponents
often associate the standards with other contentious issues, namely
teacher evaluations,
testing and student - data collection.
Betty Rosa, the Regents chancellor and a former New York City school administrator, noted the current evaluation law has created a situation under which
teachers in fields not covered by state
tests, such as physical education,
often find themselves rated on the basis of student achievement in areas that are
tested, such as English and math.
One recent study (pdf) found that among a representative sample of U.S. science students, those who said their science
teachers had them read textbooks more
often had higher
test scores.
Through early
testing and
teacher selection, certain children are singled out for an enriched lesson plan to push them to their limit, whereas others are labeled as low achievers, which
often diminishes their expectations of themselves and hurts their performance in school.
As a character, Fletcher is a Rorschach
test for feelings about fathers and
teachers — and any high - stakes training where tough love and sadism are
often indistinguishable.
Most Finns, including students and
teachers, are happy with one examination given at the end of high school rather than more frequent
tests and the side - effects that
often come with them during the course of schooling.
It would seem that the ongoing discussions about «
teacher effectiveness» and the creation of evaluation systems focused on measuring a
teacher's capacity (increasingly based on
test scores)
often do very little to actually develop that capacity.
With the pressure of high - stakes
testing and a packed curriculum, I
often coach
teachers who are nervous about giving time to a robust PBL project.
Nonetheless, institutions pushed forward with the use of personality
tests to select among
teacher candidates,
often using multiple indexes, even as critics warned that some instruments had low predictive validity, that there was inconsistency in results, or that the lack of replication warranted cautious use.
Summative assessments, or high stakes
tests and projects, are what the eagle eye of our profession is fixated on right now, so
teachers often find themselves in the tough position of racing, racing, racing through curriculum.
What the PBL
teachers often intend to do after
testing is a culminating project or activity that will celebrate and review learning.
MANY
teachers do not know how to use data provided by annual assessments of their pupils» literacy and numeracy ability, despite
often criticising the
tests themselves, a new report has found.
Within this model, they
often learn to play the game of paying attention in class and regurgitating what the
teacher wants on a
test or quiz.
President Barack Obama has
often noted in speeches the enthusiasm of Korean parents for their children's education, the high quality of Korean
teachers, the number of learning hours that Korean students spend, and the outstanding educational achievements these have produced; for example, top rankings in international academic - achievement
tests, and low rates of school dropouts and juvenile delinquency.
It demonstrates that blaming
teachers for poor
test scores and absenteeism is
often both unjust and unconstructive.
Because of the way that
testing permeates education culture, I
often hear some «pushback» from
teachers about their implementation of PBL.
Too
often, high - stakes
tests are used as the primary assessment tool for students, even for
teachers and schools, Nellen says.
We have known for decades that
teachers were being pushed into using bad
test prep, that states and districts were complicit in this, that scores were
often badly inflated, and even that score inflation was creating an illusion of narrowing achievement gaps.
But, as
teachers, we must creatively find the time for projects (
often, projects get pushed aside until the last few weeks of school, when standardized
testing is done).
«
Teachers often take students to a local college for
testing, because there are fewer distractions and the setting reminds students of why they are taking
tests and working so hard.»
«Another simple exercise we
often use with
teachers is to ask them to write down all the words that come to mind when they hear standardized
test,» Taylor shared.
These efforts follow a series of studies of high - stakes
testing programs in which Koretz found that
teachers often respond in ways that produce serious inflation of scores.
Neurologist,
teacher, and author Judy Willis explains how students» performance on
tests can
often be affected by their perceptions of and feelings about why they're being
tested and what's being assessed.
This allows for the use of statistical models to estimate the total contribution — that attributable to both observable and unobserved
teacher attributes — of
teachers toward student
test - score gains (
often referred to as «value added»).
Faced with poor student performance on
tests and assignments,
teachers often recognize that the root of the problem lies, not in a lack of understanding, but in poor study skills.
So, we
often find that
teachers spend a lot of time
testing and the
testing doesn't always get used at the end.
It wasn't always easy to teach in the way that the
teachers in this study believed learning should occur, as current structures in many Australian schools focus on
testing and
often quite narrow assessment regimes.
But the notion of paying
teachers on the basis of their ability to improve
test scores,
often termed «merit pay,» while earnestly debated by education policy researchers, is strongly opposed by
teachers unions and is a political nonstarter in many parts of the country.
When I interviewed
teachers for See Me After Class, the unintended consequences of high - stakes
tests came up most
often among language arts
teachers.
As a rookie high school history
teacher, with the best of intentions I
often told my students that a single upcoming
test or assignment would significantly impact their overall grades.
Teachers are
often encouraged by colleagues and heads of departments to take up opportunities to mark external exam or
tests.
These students, I believe, suffer the most since they are
often the
teacher - pleasers, the ones who get ignored since they do their work and produce good grades and
test scores (of course, I'm generalizing here).
In an era when
teachers are more
often judged based on students»
test scores, this shift is huge.
Further, most middle school
teachers who take the time to teach financial literacy are
often taking time away from a
tested subject area.
While this approach contrasts starkly with status quo «principal walk - through» styles of class observation, its use is on the rise in new and proposed evaluation systems in which rigorous classroom observation is
often combined with other measures, such as
teacher value - added based on student
test scores.
Teachers begin teaching to the
test to raise scores,
often at the expense of more meaningful learning activities.
Neurologist,
teacher, author and Edutopia blogger Judy Willis explains how students» performance on
tests can
often be affected by their perceptions of and feelings about why they're being
tested and what's being assessed.
And as well as being of questionable effectiveness, incentive schemes
often result in unintended and undesirable behaviours on the part of
teachers and schools, ranging from the narrowing of the school curriculum, to withholding less able students from
testing, to providing inappropriate assistance to students during
tests.
Often,
teachers give students group
tests, which, like the class worksheets, are designed to be harder than the individual assignments.
One thus saw — as still occurs today — concerted,
often largely disparate efforts being made to enhance the curriculum, literacy, numeracy, student
testing,
teacher quality, pedagogy, school governance, the digital technology, school resourcing and the school's sub-units.
Often, though,
tests do not align with a school's curriculum, and
teachers are unclear about what is expected of them, said Sandra Feldman, president of the American Federation of T
teachers are unclear about what is expected of them, said Sandra Feldman, president of the American Federation of
TeachersTeachers.
State
test results are
often not useful to
teachers because they arrive too late to inform instructional decisions, and in many cases,
teachers can not access student performance by content standard.
Teachers who've done this have found that students
often have higher
test scores than they do on more traditionally taught units.
Teachers are
often encouraged to take up opportunities to mark external exams or
tests.
The secret of many charter schools» success isn't a mystery: longer hours and additional school days, which are part of a «no excuses» philosophy that emphasizes frequent
testing and
often requires even longer days from charter school
teachers.
* Lengthy application forms,
often printed only in English, that require student and parent essays, report cards,
test scores, disciplinary records,
teacher recommendations and medical records.