Teaching to the test causes score gains that may not represent actual improvements in learning.
Not exact matches
But it ruled that the school board nonetheless passed muster under the secular purpose
test of Lemon because the school board stated two other valid secular purposes for its policy: «disclaiming any orthodoxy of belief that could be inferred from the exclusive place of evolution in the curriculum, and reducing offense
to any student or parent
caused by the
teaching of evolution.»
The damage
caused by the pressure
to teach to the
test will now be added
to by pressure
to enhance teacher assessment results for league table purposes.
Current approaches
to testing and reporting, in fact, unwittingly
cause impoverished, not rich and creative, «
teaching to the
test» items.
That statute has been denounced for
causing too much
testing of school children, making teachers «
teach to the
test»
to avoid penalties, and...
That statute has been denounced for
causing too much
testing of school children, making teachers «
teach to the
test»
to avoid penalties, and mandating the use of unproven improvement strategies for poorly performing schools.
It will indeed be a
cause to cheer if and when policy - makers start
to turn their sights away from the zero - sum game of whose schools are outperforming on ELA and Math
tests and towards the ends that chartered schools were supposed
to lead us in the first place: teacher empowerment, innovation, entrepreneurism and new models of
teaching and learning
to name just a few.
The misuse of and over-emphasis on
test scores
caused by pressures from media, corporate - style education reformers, and misguided federal laws has forced schools nationwide
to teach to these
tests, focusing one - sidedly on rote skills and ignoring higher - level thinking.
Supporters rushed the standards» adoption, used whatever political channels were most convenient, eschewed public debate and discussion, and in doing so triggered a massive backlash that either
caused states
to reject the standards outright or led them
to water down the initiative
to such an extent that there's little left of the original vision, which called for the careful alignment of standards,
tests, curricular resources, and
teaching strategies, all
to be shared across state borders.
Here are 51 easy -
to - use, classroom -
tested alternatives
to the «stand - and - deliver»
teaching techniques that
cause so many students
to tune out or drop out.
This over-emphasis has
caused many teachers
to shift their overall approach
to teaching directly
to these
tests.
WHEREAS, it is widely recognized that high - stakes standardized
testing is an inadequate and often unreliable measure of both student learning and educator effectiveness, and the over-reliance on standardized
testing has
caused considerable collateral damage in many schools, including narrowing the curriculum,
teaching to the
test, reducing student's love of learning, pushing students out of school, driving teachers out of the profession, and undermining school climate; and
It was
taught that it is not also appropriate
to drive slower or higher than the suggested speed as this will normally
cause a risk for a rear end collision and failure in a dive
test.
Moreover, terrific
teaching can actually
cause scores
to go down, and terrible
teaching can
cause scores
to rise, because the kind of instruction that's aimed at
test preparation is very different from the kind that helps kids become critical, curious, creative thinkers.