Continue Reading Employment Contracts:
Termination Provisions Unenforceable Unless They Provide For Statutory Benefits Continuation
Not exact matches
The Court also concluded that the
termination provision's silence on severance pay did not make it void and
unenforceable.
Where a
termination provision in a fixed - term employment agreement is rendered
unenforceable, the employee may be entitled to wages for the balance of the fixed term, without any reduction for mitigated damages.
The common understanding was that in order to protect employees, courts would consider
termination provisions that failed to reference the full scope of the employee's entitlements (including the continuation of benefits) to be
unenforceable and instead grant common law notice of dismissal.
There had been a real willingness on the part of lower courts to rule that under - inclusive
termination provisions were
unenforceable, and that employees subject to them were actually entitled to common law notice of
termination (which, again, is often far in excess of what the ESA provides for).
The
termination provisions should not provide for any entitlements less than those under the CLC as this could risk the
provision being declared
unenforceable.
That said,
termination provisions must still comply with local employment standards legislation or they will be
unenforceable.
Zoomermedia argued that that the
termination provision was
unenforceable because it contravened section 61 (1) of the ESA by expressly excluding entitlement to short - term and long - term disability benefits during the statutory notice period.
Therefore, the entire
termination provision was
unenforceable and Mr. Roberts was not entitled to receive the contractual severance payment.
First, any attempt to contract out of or waive a
provision of the ESA will render a
termination clause
unenforceable, even if both parties freely agree to do so.
In Oudin v. Le Centre Francophone de Toronto, The Ontario Superior Court dismissed a motion for summary judgment brought by an employee who alleged that the
termination provision in his employment agreement was
unenforceable.