Scholars in the field of Old
Testament studies question every detail of the pre-exilic corpus.
Not exact matches
The new total viewpoint of Buber's science of Biblical
study has without
question created a new situation in Old
Testament scholarship.
By the beginning of this century a great change had taken place and James Orr prefaced his defense of the traditional position by sketching the widespread
questioning and rejection of «bodily resurrection» by Christian scholars.10 In 1907 Kirsopp Lake published the first
study of the resurrection, in English, which rested upon a thorough application of historical criticism to the New
Testament records and he concluded that «The empty tomb is for us doctrinally indefensible and is historically insufficiently accredited.
If one wishes a more detailed
study of the
question, one can read Schiflebeeckx's Jesus, in which it takes him 437 pages to come to this point: «All in all, we are led to conclude that the New
Testament, not In spite of the diverse kerygmatic projects but because of them, gives substantial information about Jesus of Nazareth?»
In it, Enns focuses on three specific problems /
questions raised by the modern
study of the Old
Testament and uses those specific problems /
questions to engage in a broader conversation about the nature of Scripture.
In the
study of Old
Testament they had now been led by their teachers to discover what their human
questions were and to what
questions Jesus Christ is the answer.
Chapel Hill, NC About Blog Professor of Religious
Studies, a leading authority on the Bible and the life of Jesus, author Bart D.Ehrman discusses his books and public debates, responds to criticisms from other scholars, and answers
questions raised by readers.The History & Literature of Early Christianity provides Bart's insights and opinions on important issues related to the New
Testament and early Christianity.