While the
Texas rule is virtually identical to Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702, it omits parts (b)- (d) of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (the subparts incorporating Daubert and Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, (1999)-R
rule is virtually identical to Federal
Rule of Evidence Rule 702, it omits parts (b)- (d) of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (the subparts incorporating Daubert and Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, (1999)-R
Rule of Evidence Rule 702, it omits parts (b)- (d) of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (the subparts incorporating Daubert and Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, (1999)-R
Rule 702, it omits parts (b)- (d)
of Federal
Rule of Evidence 702 (the subparts incorporating Daubert and Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, (1999)-R
Rule of Evidence 702 (the subparts incorporating Daubert and Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, (1999)-RRB-.