Not exact matches
One other possible wrinkle that could impact the
rule's implementation, meanwhile, is a pending legal challenge in a
federal court in
Texas.
The
federal judge overseeing the case in
Texas against the Department of Labor's fiduciary
rule on Wednesday denied considering all but two of the eight amicus briefs filed in the
court, allowing only the briefs filed by the Financial Planning Coalition and the American Association for Justice.
On 6 August 2013,
Federal Judge Amos Mazzant of the Eastern District of
Texas of the Fifth Circuit
ruled that bitcoins are «a currency or a form of money» (specifically securities as defined by
Federal Securities Laws), and as such were subject to the
court's jurisdiction, [274][274] and Germany's Finance Ministry subsumed bitcoins under the term «unit of account» — a financial instrument — though not as e-money or a functional currency, a classification nonetheless having legal and tax implications.
A
federal appeals
court had
ruled in favor of school officials in Plano,
Texas, on the liability question, and the justices without comment let that decision stand.
Then, on 22 November,
federal judge Amos L. Mazzant of the Eastern District of
Texas issued an injunction that put implementation of the new
rule on hold until the
court could decide lawsuits brought against it by a number of states and employers.
The
court accepted a case from
Texas, where a
federal appeals
court ruling that prohibited organized student prayers has caused turmoil at games this fall.
Sponsors say the measures are written to be consistent with a much - debated 1992
federal appeals -
court ruling that approved student - led, nonsectarian prayers at a
Texas high school graduation.
The U.S. Supreme
Court declined last week to review a federal appeals court's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took ef
Court declined last week to review a
federal appeals
court's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took ef
court's
ruling that a
Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took effect.
Texas created the policy in 1997 after a
federal appellate
court ruled, in Hopwood v.
Texas, that the state's previous affirmative - action system based on racial preferences was unconstitutional.
And a third decision brought fresh attention to a landmark
federal appeals
court ruling against considering race at the University of
Texas law school.
Documents Illuminate AGs Politicized Climate Campaign Against Exxon by Chris Horner, Senior Legal Fellow, as appearing in RealClear Energy On Oct. 13, a
federal court in Ft. Worth,
Texas ruled that Massachusetts Attorney General -LSB-...]
They include volumes covering Title 18 of the U.S. Code, the
federal sentencing guidelines, the
federal search and seizure manual, various
Texas codes and
rules, and various
federal court rules.
The
Texas Supreme
Court ruled that the action should have been litigated in federal court, because Minton's malpractice claim relied on the viability of the experimental use exception as a defense to invali
Court ruled that the action should have been litigated in
federal court, because Minton's malpractice claim relied on the viability of the experimental use exception as a defense to invali
court, because Minton's malpractice claim relied on the viability of the experimental use exception as a defense to invalidity.
Minton asserted a legal malpractice claim in
Texas state
court after a
federal court ruled that his patent was invalid due to a statutory bar, alleging that his attorney, Gunn, failed to timely raise the experimental use exception.
On a petition for writ of mandamus, the
Federal Circuit ordered the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of
Texas to transfer venue of a patent action — rejecting the four - part venue test proposed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap following the U.S. Supreme
Court's
ruling in TC Heartland LLC...
Federal appeals
court rules that
Texas can begin enforcing restrictions on abortion clinics, Reuters
In
Texas, the Eastern District
federal courts and all of the support systems will face a major contraction as the new
ruling takes effect.
Texas: bill removes power of State Commission on Judicial Conduct to discipline judges who refuse to follow
federal court rulings; claims state judges have free speech right to refuse to obey
federal court rulings
In fact, the
Texas Supreme
Court devoted a section of its opinion to making that very point, noting that its application of proportionality principles aligned practice under the
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure with practice under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, the
court ruled that the
Texas Arbitration Act superseded the
Federal Arbitration Act, allowing parties to contract the right of judicial review of arbitration awards.
The Obama Administration's latest change to the nation's overtime
rules, which was set to take effect on December 1, 2016, has been blocked preliminarily by a
federal court in
Texas.
This Supreme
Court ruling brings
Texas into the mainstream of class - action law, making
Texas law consistent with
federal law, United States Supreme
Court decisions, and the law of most sister states.
But it is unlikely the
court will
rule on this case before the May 31, 2018 deadline imposed by
Texas - based Kinder Morgan Inc., which succeeded in generating a quick response from the Alberta and
federal government.
This is inconsequential, however, because the
Texas Supreme
Court and
Court of Criminal Appeals have both articulated standards concerning the admissibility of expert testimony that are consistent with the
federal rule's text.
Federal appeals
court upholds
ruling in AALDEF case that
Texas election law violates Voting Rights Act
We urge the Eastern District of
Texas to bring its
courts back into line with the
Federal Rules.