Sentences with phrase «text history in»

Once in the app, users have to go to Menu — > App Settings, and tap Sync Your Call and Text History in order to disable the feature.

Not exact matches

Among the data that can be transmitted to remote servers include the voice call recordings in Skype and Wechat, Chrome browser history logs, text messages sent in Skype and Facebook messenger, and photos.

Facebook will also delete call logs older than a year for Messenger and Facebook Lite users on Android who have opted - in to the call and text history feature.

Facebook can see the call and text history for Android users who opt in to let the company see that data.

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site: «But there has also never in the history of the market been a time when we went to a P / E10 level in the 30s and did not see a price crash of 50 percent to 65 percent» And there have never been two such crashes less than 80 years apart.

We see also in Islam a growing progressive trend toward a critical rereading of Islamic texts and history.

But why would he know — he can not comprehend the accumalation of the texts and history after them on the debate of Torahnic law... which Jesus himself participated in (this banter back n forth on what the Torah means in certain sections — or interpretation of how the law is used in daily life).

It doesn't matter to me whether this is «correct» exegesis — either the Bible finds some way of adapting to the modern notions of morality, or it gets left by the wayside on the ever growing dung - heap of rejected holy texts of human history — in my opinion, that's the historical moment we are currently faced with.

The Textus Receptus (Received Text) is probably the most accurately transcribed text in human histText) is probably the most accurately transcribed text in human histtext in human history.

It's the most historically vetted text in the history of the world.

An activist decision is one that invalidates a law or executive action without a solid basis for doing so in the text, history or structure of the Constitution.

This position is not only taught in the AACS science textbooks but in texts for history, geography, social science and literature.

It is not what Jesus intended or said or what the texts assert, but the actual consequences in history which are her touchstone.

I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).

He represents a majority of the att.itudes in varying form and is a product of a flawed text, political and tyrannical interpretations of the text and a sustained history of browbeating, hell scaring, misogyny, racism etc..

Until the modern period, Jewish peoplehood — the notion that the Jews are a distinct group based on both historical and biological criteria — was almost always embedded in the larger tapestry of Jewish ritual, ideas, texts, and history.

Blumhofer, who was on the faculty of the AG seminary when she published the history (she is now at Wheaton College in Illinois), devotes a full third of her text to the church's prehistory.

Any person who reads into the history of Christianity will find that there were many competing schools of thought when the religion was founded, and there are nuances of meaning within the text that were lost in translation.

This was the 1/6 (one shilling and sixpence) popular edition of Fr Philip Caraman SJ's 1951 translation of Gerard's Latin text and it awakened in me a lasting fascination with recusant history.

the Bible has been the most read & most scrutinized text in history.

To be deep in history is certainly, for instance, to cease to be an evangelical of the kind who allows experience to trump doctrine, who believes doctrine can be read off the surface of the biblical text, and who sees no theological or existential problem that can not be solved with a proof text or two.

One of the most gruesome texts in all the Bible (maybe in all of history) is found in Psalm 137:8 - 9:

Yet in the 4,400 pages of the ten economics texts I reviewed, all of the references to religion add up to only two pages, and all are to distant history.

With the exception of brief discussions of Darwin in the world histories and the Scopes trial in the American histories, the texts ignore theological responses to science after the 18th century

The Second Vatican Council is briefly mentioned in only two of the eight texts I reviewed; it is not mentioned in the 250 pages of the national history standards.

To keep my discussion manageable I will comment only on high school texts and standards in three subject areas: economics, the sciences and history.

Perhaps most important, while the great Western religions have held that God is revealed in the events and shape of history, none of the texts discuss religious interpretations of history.

This is, nonetheless, a major achievement in the history of English translations of the Bible, and if it underscores all that is lost when one approaches the text without a knowledge of Hebrew, that, too, makes it a worthy contribution.

In the annals of American history, we've garnered precious little main text; we're the cultural equivalent of a buried footnote.

On page 15 of «The Interpreters Bible», Dr. Herbert F. Farmer, Professor of Divinity at Cambridge University wrote about the indispensability of the texts, their importance and how the «truth» of them should be approached, after an exposition of the traditional conservative Christian view of person - hood, sin and the salvific actions of Jesus (aka Yeshua ben Josef), known as «the Christ» in human history.

Such a history of «subjective aim» is possible only because of a compositional idiosyncrasy of Whitehead's: although he revised his position many times, he tried very hard to preserve the texts of earlier positions in the final version, often by insertions designed to persuade the reader to interpret such texts in the light of later positions.

Erika Delbecque, a librarian at Reading University, found the medieval text buried in a box as she catalogued thousands of items about the history of printing and graphic design the library's archives.

Maclear's «documentary history» provides the major texts that crop up again and again in discussions of church «state relations but are themselves frequently inaccessible to all but specialists.

This valuation of the particular provides Buber with another criterion, that of the «historically possible» which leaves room for the unique: «It is a basic law of methodology not to permit the «firm letter» to be broken down by any general hypothesis based on the comparative history of culture; as long as what is said in that text is historically possible.»

As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it does not simply conduct a one - sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.

Professor Hittinger seems to think that natural law reasoning in deciding cases has safeguards: «Virtually no one holds that natural law can be a tool of legal interpretation completely independent of texts and history.»

Text: One of my graduate school professors, commenting on a historian famous for his prolific reading and reviewing of recent work in American history, said, «We should be grateful to him.

It said «most important» as in «this text has had a massive impact on human history, from wars to literature, from art to entire political systems; all have been heavily informed by this text.»

But what is the relationship of natural law and history to the text when Chief Justice Taney could find in the due process clause a constitutional right to own slaves and Justice Blackmun, with the concurrence of six of Ids colleagues, found in the same clause a right to an abortion?

To those theologians who contend that the life and resurrection of Jesus is one of the most documented events in ancient history, both in scripture and recorded history, Berger asks them to produce «one single police report» from a nonpartisan source that wasn't inserted into the text far after the fact!

exhibit so that I could text my sister from the hall — she's a historian and even though her specialty is more in Canadian history, one of her secret joys is ancient civilizations.

But the process of ecumenical and interreligious dialogue that Pope Benedict XVI has repeatedly endorsed may cause participants to question whether any canonical story of violence — such as the conquest narratives in Joshua and Judges, or functionally equivalent texts in the history of Islam — may legitimately be claimed to offer a religious warrant for continued violence in today's world.

Some Christian scholars are now more interested in the text as we have it and in the history of how it has been used and understood over the centuries by the Church.

Hans Frei, a historian who reflected upon the history of biblical interpretation, was a theologian who called us to faith in Jesus Christ as presented in the texts, not behind the texts.

Not most importantly that since the bible is the most heavily researched book in the history of the world by wide orders of magnitude, scholars have thoroughly examined textual criticism issues such as this, and the Christian can rest assured that: — the bible we have is over 99 % original text — none of the verses under issue affect the Christian message of salvation through faith in the atoning work of Jesus on the cross at all, not even the smallest amount.

I had a fascinating conversation with Max Stackhouse of Andover - Newton Seminary who felt that one of our greatest needs in the subject area of this book was for an examination of the history of preaching on certain texts as the «Rich Young Ruler» to see how sermons related to different contexts.

All the more powerful then are insights whose very genesis lies in those religious texts which have throughout human history provided the symbolic landmarks for life's orientation.

In challenging that misconstruction of Jewish history and theology, along with several other deeply problematic aspects of Dabru Emet, Prof. Levenson did a great service to furthering open discussion on a topic that is far from resolved in the minds of most rabbis and Jewish thinkers, Prof. Novak's «normative text for Jews» notwithstandinIn challenging that misconstruction of Jewish history and theology, along with several other deeply problematic aspects of Dabru Emet, Prof. Levenson did a great service to furthering open discussion on a topic that is far from resolved in the minds of most rabbis and Jewish thinkers, Prof. Novak's «normative text for Jews» notwithstandinin the minds of most rabbis and Jewish thinkers, Prof. Novak's «normative text for Jews» notwithstanding.

In every period of the history of Christianity, the church has had favorite texts and favored interpretations.

I have plenty of facts in History and Extra biblical texts that support my belief in God and Jesus.