Principals Report More Influence Over School Budgets
Than Curriculum Choice in National Survey
Not exact matches
This
curriculum — organized into missions and quests — focuses on multifaceted challenges that may have more
than one correct answer, letting students explore different solutions by making
choices along the way, says Ross Flatt, assistant principal at the school.
Many educators believe that authentic assessment (asking students to perform complex tasks rather
than answer multiple -
choice questions) encourages better teaching and learning; if this proves true, then
curriculum providers using authentic assessments would dominate the market, despite their higher costs.
Rather
than bouncing around from one education fad to another, our schools had no
choice but to remain steadfast in their dedication to «back - to - basics»
curricula and a traditional «no - excuses» culture.
«And the idea of the spiral
curriculum — where you can over time revisit basic ideas / concepts in ever more complex ways — is so different from today, where we try to simplify things to lists, or memorization of isolated names and numbers, or multiple
choice options, thereby deadening rather
than waking up the mind.»
Neither middle class or poor parents should have fewer or no
choices in the array of schools whose teaching and
curricula are critical to the futures of their children and communities,
than in restaurants to which they should never have to go.
The reality that
choice remains illusory for four - fifths of all children in this country and especially for the kids who need strong, comprehensive college - preparatory
curricula the most (and, as Dropout Nation has documented ad nauseam, are the least likely to get it in traditional districts) is more
than enough reason to adopt Common Core (alongside expanding the array of
choice options that can allow for a variety of
curricula choices).
Summary: There are ways to engage students in decision - making including providing feedback on learning experiences, granting more
choice in
curriculum, making student involvement in school governance more
than a symbolic gesture, including students on interview panels for teachers, and asking for suggestions on school - wide needs, problems and challenges.
For example, as my team reported in School
Choice in the Real World, Arizona charter school teachers are more
than twice as likely (62 - 25 %)
than district school teachers to report having a role in establishing
curricula, and more
than three times as likely (55 - 17 %) to determine class schedules.
However, most of these tests are multiple
choice, standardized measures of achievement, which have had a number of unintended consequences, including: narrowing of the academic
curriculum and experiences of students (especially in schools serving our most school - dependent children); a focus on recognizing right answers to lower - level questions rather
than on developing higher - order thinking, reasoning, and performance skills; and growing dissatisfaction among parents and educators with the school experience.
She argues that school reformers assume that schools can do more to address poverty
than is realistic, that accountability policies encourage narrowing of the
curriculum and teaching to the test, that vouchers have accumulated no significant evidence of effectiveness, that «virtual charter schools» are a ripoff of taxpayers, and that there are more effective policy solutions that are far from test - based accountability and «school
choice» policies: social services for poor families, early childhood education, protecting the autonomy of teachers and elected school boards, reducing class sizes, eliminating for - profit companies and chains from operating charter schools, and aggressively fighting racial and socioeconomic segregation in schools.
In order to foster student engagement — to encourage investment of time and effort in their legal studies — the Calgary
curriculum focuses on 1) increasing student
choice; 2) introducing more focused and intensive learning (to allow students to deepen their effort in one area rather
than skimming the surface of several); and 3) improving scaffolding in the first year program.
Summary: There are ways to engage students in decision - making including providing feedback on learning experiences, granting more
choice in
curriculum, making student involvement in school governance more
than a symbolic gesture, including students on interview panels for teachers, and asking for suggestions on school - wide needs, problems and challenges.