Sentences with phrase «then average their answers»

Then average their answers.

Not exact matches

On average, each question will take about 5 - 7 minutes to answer, so if you told the person the call will take 30 minutes, then plan to ask about 6 questions.

Incorrect Answers Question: If taxes equal government spending, then: Your Answer: government debt is zero Correct Answer: tax per person equals government spending per person on average Question: The Puritans: Your Answer: opposed all wars on moral grounds Correct Answer: stressed the sinfulness of all humanity

If you're anything like the average first - time parent, then your answer is most likely....

Well, then pete had the right answer, although I think the amplitude of the zig - zags of the hockey stick for the 100 added together (or let's say averaged at each time t) would be more than one - tenth of the individual PC1s.

With selection of authors drawn with equal likelihood of either gender then a random guessing machine making 1,045 guesses would expect to get an average of 522 correct answers and if it repeated the experiment many times we would expect 95 % of the results to lie between 490 and 554 correct answers.

Having defined the optimal frequency to make contributions through dollar cost averaging (monthly) above, I then set about finding an answer to the question of what the best asset class is to purchase with each new contribution.

Finally to answer your question: You can achieve his 13 % tax rate by ignoring all taxes except federal tax, by calculating the average tax rate instead of the marginal tax rate (these two don't change what you pay, but what the numbers are in your mind), then by making huge donations to charities, buying a big house with a big mortgage, and having unpaid expenses.

If the answer is only «pretty good» then resuming house training techniques will be needed to improve his batting average.

Since the average clinic might not have time to spend hours immediately answering questions online, you can run a campaign through which you take questions over a period of time and then send out the answers as one post or as a series of posts alongside some beautiful images or memes to keep it fun and engaging.

The best simple answer I've seen is basically that you have to go to a 2 - box model of Earth, with warm tropics and cold poles, and then realize that thanks to the thermohaline circulation the deep oceans are coupled almost exclusively to the polar regions, and so are in the «cold» box and not the warm one or some average of them.

There seem to be two answers; either temperatures are going to rise at an average annual rate as predicted by the IPCC and the GCMs, or temperatures are going to reach a maximum and then decline.

Should the veracity of the GH theory not have to answer to these far more detailed predictions then to a simple estimation of increased surface temperature, and using whichever of the various means of arriving at a global average best matches that one parameter?

If their answers are not sufficiently clear and accurate to convince the average person, as well as the skeptic, then they're also insufficient to be used as the basis for real - world actions.

If we ask, «Will the earths average temperature melt all of the polar ice» and all we know («normal science» knowing) is that the average temp is between -273 and 100K, then we can not answer that question with scientific knowledge.

If the question is, what is the point about which the average motion of a given planet is most Keplerian over a given interval of time, then Leif's answer of «every planet orbits the barycenter of that body and the Sun» may be approximately the correct one.

Then you get the IPCC taking the averages of 22 different models, all possibly cherry - picked to provide the «right» answer — and the averages of the different models are averaged again.