Sentences with phrase «then chose points»

Not exact matches

Consider the purpose of the gathering, then choose one to three salient points to mention.

The celeb can then choose to answer these questions by responding directly to the fan, at which point the fan will likely freak out on their Twitter page that Kim Kardashian just answered their query as to how she lost her baby weight (it was the Atkins diet).

At some point the company may choose to do so, but until then you should plan to hold your investment for a significant period of time before a «liquidation event» occurs.

If you believe in active management over passive management (i.e., you think there is value to someone choosing particular stocks over a broad - based index), then you will prefer mutual funds (Yes, there are several actively - managed ETFs, but not enough to choose from at this point).

Why has the NDP chosen to attack this world - class institution to score cheap political points, and then be flat wrong?

Beside I think the whole point of Mormon's baptizing dead people is that then they would have a choice to choose or deny the mormon doctrine?????

My point is that when a homosexual couple wants an offspring they will try only one way that is copulation the way God planed if not from their own loins then from a third party, Adoption, IVF, this is how they choose.

As far as someone who calls them self a Christian and is involved in sin we should absolutely point out their sin and if they choose to continue in their sin then we should not associate with them.

I'm not sure I understood your last point, I operate under no such delusion, I will make no bones about the fact that if you choose to spend your life here without God, then you will do the very same in your eternity.

(Maybe not... based on your ramblings I guess I should not take that for granted) But for some reason you have chosen to accept the revelation of science only up to a specific point in history and then no more.

You are welcome to disagree, and you are free to do so in whatever manner you choose; if your response is some type of irrational, hate - driven attack on someone else's way of life, though, you really are contributing more to my point then your own.

And then, after that, the believer chose Christ (Palmer, Five Points of Calvinism, 28).

But those who chose the faintly unhinged design wanted to make a point about the sort of country Britain then was, and they were very successful.

not only does this author abuse the scripture, he points out the «pick and choose» flaws in many of these arguments... and then goes on to only use one verse himself... LOL this guy should right Obama's speeches.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

At the point where anyone of religious faith would then attribute the goodness and power of creation to an omnipotent and loving God, Frank chooses to step back from that conclusion, and just revel in «the mystery», and bemoan its sudden passing when we die.

I tried picking and choosing what to ignore and what to follow and quickly realized that if you do that, you can not be sincere about your religion, and if you aren't sincere, then what's the point?

And if it can be shown that God as witnessed in the Scriptures is not the liberator of the oppressed, then black theology would have either to drop the «Christian» designation or to choose another starting point.

So then what is the point of God's having a chosen people?

when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.

If you choose not to use the Weight Watchers recipe builder to calculate your smoothie PointsPlus (in which case the banana is free) then the smoothie is 4 points + instead of 7.

Predictably, after doing the same things over and over, I get sick of the same workout and the same thing for breakfast, and then get to the point where I choose not to work out, or choose a drive - thru breakfast because I'm tired of what I have at home.

Next Up: The Vols have a «Name your chosen point total» game against Georgia State in Knoxville on Saturday, then welcome Florida to town on September 15 and Akron on September 22.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If you have no control or influence over the decisions of a third party multi-national business and they are making decisions you don't like then get wise to the fact, make your point then either do something about it yourself or at least stop slagging off those who are in a similar position with no control but choose to behave differently.

I spent the After noon before he went to work On the 5th of November Promising the sex, The Vacations and holidays he wanted and to let him choose a position any place else on the next bid list that went up in two weeks then we might have a real married life The Next eight years was Armed intimidatrioion because nobody would face him other wise, Even that ended up with him remembering who held him at gun point then he would catch them in ambush and make sure they hurt very badly.

The World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action points out that «When feeding bottles are used in public for fear of public exposure of breasts, or when women's reasons for choosing bottle - feeding include fears that breastfeeding will alter the shape of their breasts, then women are being treated as sex objects.

My point is that if you are going to rely on a historical based fear of women and babies dieing in childbirth (which they did and still do) then it is important to look at the correlations and significant factors so you can consciously choose if you want to continue acting from that fear based model.

While it's your responsibility to coach your child and point out the consequences of his choices, your child learns best when given the opportunity to identify his choices, consider each choice, choose, and then experience the outcome.

If a government - run health service decides to seriously restrict the practice of midwives, then a woman's right to choose a home birth becomes a moot point because even if she can secure the services of an Independent Midwife, or if she qualifies for one of the handful of hospital - led home birth schemes (known as DOMINO)-- she will not genuinely be «allowed» to make this choice because midwives are not covered by insurance to attend these births.

At some point, however, if we all move towards the co-op model, we will work out the retailers from the system... so the only to buy cloth diapers will be to choose from like 2 things at Target / Walmart... maybe a couple things on Amazon... and then find the co-ops.

These wonderful additions to any ceremony or reception make a beautiful focal point for wedding photos too, so choose the one that reflects your personality and style, then use it to your best advantage for stunning wedding photographs.

They want to be able to choose people — perhaps on a «points - based system» — who will most benefit the economy: superstars of the future — unhindered by «backwards» cultural tradition and able to innovate and drive forward a new economy; cheap labour which — free from EU regulations — can be brought into work hard on construction projects and then sent packing afterwards.

If the electorate won't vote for our leader then what is the point in choosing him or her in the first place?

Taxpayer - funded charter schools should not have the right to choose to educate fewer high - needs students than public schools and then point to how successful they are in comparison.

There is no point in having a review body that chooses comparators then doesn't keep us up with them.»

«But then he could choose to vacate at that point.

The Assembly then chose not to pass the nine agreed - upon points.

If your goal is to persuade and be believed about the truth of a particular point, then what would possess you to choose to work in a genre whose very name, fiction, explicitly warns the reader not to believe a word she reads?

The M - TRAN computer cycles through thousands of possible patterns of motion, selecting the most promising candidates, sampling their effectiveness, and then choosing the most promising as the starting point for the next round of candidates.

The user simply points and clicks on an item, then chooses a grasp.

After the students calculated the basic data of the human being, they were then able to calculate both the time and power required to teleport the human from Earth to the chosen point in space.

In this session, students will justify choosing specific traits for their child, then acquire points used to buy additional traits.

However I was able then at that point to take any food I choose.

You can also choose to keep a track of the calories for a few days and then make it a point to keep an average.

Next time, you'll do 4 × 5, work your way up to 4 × 10, then 5 × 5 to 5 × 10, at which point you could think about choosing a more difficult exercise and start again at 3 × 5.

Armed with a tape measure and dressed only in your best under wear, measure your bust at the fullest point, then for your waist choose the narrowest point above the navel..

If you are wearing separates, then choose one floral print (either at the top or at the bottom) as the focal point and then work the rest of your outfit around this focal point.

Predictably, after doing the same things over and over, I get sick of the same workout and the same thing for breakfast, and then get to the point where I choose not to work out, or choose a drive - thru breakfast because I'm tired of what I have at home.

m a cool dude and a very humble man so therefore im one of the realest man out here in the world so if one of u ladies choose to get at me then from that point on u can get to know me better...