Sentences with phrase «then logical thinking»

Not exact matches

You do this by thinking through all the objections that a qualified prospect might make, then develop logical, complete answers to each of these objections so you're prepared if and when they come up.

At first I thought it was incredibly logical, and then I started finding out about the different quirks, all the ways you can count to ten depending on the shape of the object.

You can then start to think — and not just react — and the exchange becomes more logical and less emotional.

If we don't have another «Sell in May», then toward the end of this summer, investors may want to assess a longer - term outlook, and a logical step may be to think about $ 120 earnings and an 18 P / E.

Seminary, then, is a learning laboratory in which Christians can learn to think about the logical implications of Christian doctrine.

Creating a website forces you to think through what is more important about your church, and then organize it in a logical and orderly way.

If you really think that intelligence is a good thing, then the only logical path here is to use that intelligence and realize that god most likely does not exist.

Concerning the conceivability of nothing, Craighead asserts that there is no logical or practical difficulty in our thinking of every contingent item of our experience becoming nonexistent and then not being replaced by anything else; in fact, he holds, the reason we can appreciate a magician's trick or the steady - state theory of cosmology is that we can indeed conceive of a rabbit or of hydrogen atoms appearing out of absolutely nothing.

If the division was any busier then I'd ofcourse rather see Anderson vs another prospect just because that seems like more logical matchmaking, but as the way things are (and I'm not saying the UFC couldn't change the way things are if they really invested in it) I think this is as good a match up as we can ask for from a sport perspective.

missing out on kyrchowik is just being arrogant thinking coq is going to do the job & then after the season get over we will hear more logical explanations from wenger more stats etc

its almost as if wenger hears what everyone else is saying, looks at the most logical simple lineup and then goes «but i'm smarter than that: i will surprise them by putting out this incredibly unguessable, surprising lineup because i will never do what everyone thinks because I AM THE MANAGER»

I have always liked lacazette, so this might come across as me making excuses, but which honest logical thinking arsenal fan could tell me that we are playing good football, so why are we so quick to find fault with lacazette, a player who has proved that once given the right service, will score, so we shift our frustration from a player who we've only just bought and ignore the fact that we play sideways and backwards, edging forward, then when in the final third we start playing five - aside, we've become predictable, one dimensional and a laughing stock on and of the pitch.

If we take a defensive player in the 1st, an interior lineman or a running back in the 2nd, then I think the next logical pick would be to take whatever position we didn't take in the 2nd.

Walk away and cool off, and then later on you can hold your child accountable with consequences that are well - thought out, logical, and meaningful.

Then there are the less logical thoughts people like me — who value predictability, organization, and high levels of competence — entertain while we're sitting there, every two or three hours, breastfeeding our bottomless pit of a baby.

It would seem logical, then, to think that the babies of mothers who practice attachment parenting would not need attachment objects.

«To write concisely: fully explain your thoughts in paragraph form, distill each paragraph into an easily understood sentence, and then string these sentences together to create a logical flow of ideas.»

but, being the logical thinking person that I am, I have the following question... If Dr. G's video was correct, then it would follow that the masses of paleo eaters would become diabetics with extremely high cholesterol levels!

But once we realize that people have very different kinds of minds, different kinds of strengths — some people are good in thinking spatially, some in thinking language, others are very logical, other people need to be hands - on and explore actively and try things out — then education, which treats everybody the same way, is actually the most unfair education.

When students are ready to use logical thinking skills to organize abstract ideas, then they are ready to benefit from The Write Foundation.

This may sound like a logical first step when you are getting started in real estate investing, but think about this - what if you determined an area first, then found out you can't get enough money to buy a home there?

If this shutdown was in the works, it is logical to think that it was kept under wraps for fear the word would get out, spread, and then people would grab their CB before the closures began.

So IF I'm happy to fly those days, and IF I think $ 2,500 RT to London in business class is reasonable, then it's a logical thing to buy.

My focus lately has been shifting from completing older design docs, to learning Game Maker Studio, and then deciding that I should read up more on logical thinking for programming, and at the same time spruce up my memory on an easy to learn language that I was still familiar with, Processing.

So for his, then upcoming show in Berlin he thought what's the next logical step up from a flag or a banner, and a quilt is what has came to his mind.

He then went on to explain why it's perfectly logical to think that dinosaurs and man coexisted on Earth.

If you think that the atmosphere isn't warming, then maybe you can present a logical argument to explain why ACO2 isn't warming the climate.

If you think that ACO2 warms the climate, and you haven't identified some anomalous factor that would explain some «pause» or «stop,» when you say that the warming has «paused» or «stopped,» then you are not being logical.

It certainly looks interesting that Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Triton, and Pluto are warming, and if that's all you heard then it seems logical to think maybe the Sun is the cause.

However, I do think it is rational and logical to think that if a misleading narrative was intentionally constructed from that set of documents then that narrative might not be valid.

However, if «skeptics» toss out 8 conspiracy theories, 10 logical fallacies, and 17 arguments with ZERO thought put into them, then it is a good thing that we get to hear all sides.

If you (generic) can't see how ludicrous it is to think that a real gas which has weight and volume behaves in the atmosphere as if an ideal gas which has neither, and think that because the ideal imaginary gas spreads to fill the container according to its given properties means that a real gas CO2 behaves this way in the atmosphere, you'll be easily convinced that CO2 can diffuse and spreads as this imaginary gas and take it as perfectly logical then that because it is well mixed by this imaginary diffusion it stays that way and can stay in the atmosphere for hundreds and even thousands of years accumulating.

If we are concerned about this but also care about logical consistency, then we should leave it to the jury to reject a mistake caused by intoxication on the same basis as any other, ie if it thinks that it was unreasonable on its own merits, and disregarding the prehistory of the mistake.