Therefore electronic records management is now better defined as «records control,» and not simply as «systems management.»
Not exact matches
Therefore, 72.34 is an extremely important national standard, particularly so because
electronic records and information
management technology enables every
electronic interaction, communication, and movement of information to automatically produce an
electronic record, any one of which could be related to a legal service or proceeding, and become a piece of evidence,
records now being the most frequently used kind of evidence.
Therefore an investigation of the quality of
electronic records management is mandatory.
And
therefore, how can the Sedona Canada Principles — Addressing
Electronic Discovery be an adequate text, given that it completely ignores the importance of electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evid
Electronic Discovery be an adequate text, given that it completely ignores the importance of
electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evid
electronic records management, and the critical dependence on an
electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evid
electronic record upon its ERMS, and also the provisions of the Evidence Acts?
Therefore it doesn't investigate such defects, or the state of
electronic records management, or the quality of the software that operates it.
Re: lawyers practising in association with non-lawyers: - Absolutely necessary because: (1) technology will be the basis of almost all laws,
therefore we will have to practice with other experts in that technology; (2)
records management law will be a major area of practice because,
records are the most frequently used form of evidence and e-
records depend for everything on their e-
records management systems (ERMSs), and they must be compliant with the National Standards of Canada for e-
records management, which standards require legal opinions, and every significant change to an ERMS requires a legal opinion re ability to produce
records able to satisfy laws as to e-discovery, admissibility of evidence, privacy & access to information,
electronic commerce, tax laws, and compliance with National Standards of Canada for e-
records management; (3) all new technologies require a legal framework, which means more work for lawyers; and, (4) otherwise, other professions and service providers who now provide «legal information,» will begin to provide «legal advice» and other services that only lawyers should be providing.
[4]
Therefore, during e-discovery proceedings concerning large ERMSs, opposing lawyers should be asking one another: «Is your client's
electronic records management system in compliance with the National Standard of Canada for
electronic records management, and if so, when was the last time it was so certified by an expert in
electronic records management?»
Electronic discovery can not be made as simple and inexpensive as pre-electronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication creates
Electronic discovery can not be made as simple and inexpensive as pre-
electronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication creates
electronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-
record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-
electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication creates
electronic paper
record is not affected by its
records management system; (2)
electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication creates
electronic technology has made the making of
records much less expensive and time - consuming,
therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every
electronic communication creates
electronic communication creates a
record.
For purposes of this discussion, mobile phone tower location data involves two technologies: (1) that which provides the mobile phone services and thereby produces the data that is
recorded in Rogers»
electronic records management systems (ERMSs), and is later made available to the police; and, (2) the technology upon which Rogers» ERMSs are based, and is
therefore that which is depended upon to accurately store and retrieve such data.