Think over these questions before you start writing.
But before you make the decision to bring a furry friend into your life, take a moment to
think over these questions:
Please take a moment to
think over these questions:
But before you make that decision to bring a furry friend into your life, take a moment to
think over these questions:
Not exact matches
When faced with curveball
questions such as these, best - selling management author and CNBC contributor Suzy Welch says the best way to respond is to carefully
think over your answer before blurting it out.
«I
think that sometimes we skip
over what ought to be the first and most important
question, which is
thinking long and hard and deeply about how to frame the problem,» Gladwell said.
Rather than ask difficult
questions and
think things thoroughly through, decision makers unconsciously use the word synergy to make problematic deals seem more palatable, like slathering ketchup
over rancid meatloaf.
Responding to a
question about whether his companies had suffered blowback
over his stated politics, Thiel said, «I don't
think so.»
The key takeaway is much the same as Olds» — just take a little time to ask a few
questions and
think things
over before you exercise your admirable frankness.
I
think the transmission of the monetary policy may be improving... But the
question is
over the missing inflation,» he said.
Stabilising and maintaining price expectations is the key issue in
thinking about the
question of «
over the course of the cycle».
«I
think it's safe to say very simply that Facebook is losing the trust of an awful lot of Americans as a result of this incident,» said Peters, tying his constituents»
questions about mobile data mining to their outrage
over the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
But
over time, many self - declared fans of integrative
thinking began to ask Roger (and later Jennifer) this
question: «How do we actually apply integrative
thinking to our own problems and situations?»
Before a capacity audience of
over 550, Dr. Zakaria shared his
thoughts on the historical underpinnings of President Trump as a geopolitical game changer before engaging in a
question - and - answer session moderated by APF Canada President and CEO, Stewart Beck.
Instead of just handing
over contact information for an ebook or white paper, quiz takers are engaged with
thought provoking, compelling and fun
questions.
Salespeople who ask provocative
questions and challenge prospects to
think differently about their situation are far more likely to close sales than the nice guy or gal who lets others walk all
over them.
However, I
think the shock to Europe is probably one that could be a little more permanent, and people will likely begin to
question investments in the eurozone
over the longer - term.
I
think what shook markets across the globe was not the size of Greece's economy or financial system, but more the prospect of a Greek exit from the eurozone, which would have put a big
question mark
over the irreversibility of the entire euro system.
There's no hard and fast rule for when this is but if you hear a family member or someone at the table say something you
think might be worth calling them out
over, you could try asking yourself these
questions:
Norman: and I
think what is being intentionally looked
over is that the «segregation» in
question is entirely, entirely a voluntary pursuit.
I don't
think it's a
question of cruelty to him or to the organization — I
think there's a meta story here that we seem to have to confront
over and
over.
Now that my year of biblical womanhood is
over, I
thought you might have some
questions for us — about the project, about our marriage, about our strange, self - employed life in East Tennessee.
I
think we have gotten to a place of understanding
over the last 10 - 15 years that God doesn't expect perfection from us, and He does meet us where we are, and that He can handle our big
questions and our wrestling and our doubts.
Me
Thinks Mary isn't answering... so why all the posts dated the February 23, 2011 ASKING THE SAME
QUESTIONS OVER AGAIN?
Are you SO indoctrinated that you
think everything will end, and your lives will be
over, or have no purpose, if you
question your religious beliefs.
I
think you are very confused
over the point of the
question.
The real
question the Church of England will have to
think about
over the next few years is, what can we learn from this in a rural context?»
As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of
thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity)
over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum
questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).
With respect to doctrinal
questions (as distinct from ethical
questions) I
think there is far too much emphasis in most churches on what you are required to believe, which results in relationship - ending events
over inconsequential stuff.
In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY
think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's
questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray
over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.
Then, too, it will presumably be possible to leave it an open
question whether the history of human descent as known to us does or does not possess features which only after the Fall of the first man can be
thought of to some extent as a predominance of his pre-human past and of his environment,
over a sensitivity to the world around him no longer protected by the gift of integrity, and
over his lack of adaptation to a particular milieu.
I
question the source that came up with this for you, but I
think there's a higher debate
over whether successful people should be automatically branded in a negative, manipulative light.
The chairman of Christian Aid also appeared to blame the ongoing debate
over Europe on a growing sense of nationalism in the UK, he said: «With the Scottish independence agitation and all the
questions about a federal UK quite a lot of people feel we need to affirm now what we are, what we distinctively are as English even more than British and that imperceptibly I
think strengthens some of this unease about that mysterious entity called Europe which is
over there.»
As I
think over my conversation with him today, and after watching only 15 minutes of the movie, I have two
questions I want to ask him.
His strategy, which he refers to as a «recurrence» to this phase of philosophic
thought, is to back up to the point where he is sitting there cheek to jowl with Descartes, and then to start all
over again, this time avoiding the hopeless dualism which has kept Descartes, and the whole tradition which constitutes the phase of
thought in
question, from completing the Copernican Revolution.
Over coffee, quietly raise theological
questions such as, «What do you
think Steinbrenner and A-Rod will discuss in hell?»
Over at Times and Seasons, a blog mostly for Mormons, where I am guest, I have posted some
thoughts on a «third - order»
question that lies behind or underneath the most vital (I
think) contemporary political issues.
I do not know of any, and I have been
thinking about such
questions for
over forty years.
The Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church has felt sometimes the WCC has not placed its
thinking on the social content of salvation solidly within the perspective of the ultimate goal of salvation... the eternal life in God, «with the result that appropriation of eternal life is made to depend on social conditions rather than social conditions on the appropriation of eternal life»; and the Ecumenical Patriarchate has warned us that in «turning towards the anguish of the man today», the WCC must not forget the basic truth that man sees himself as hungering for an answer to a basic
question over and beyond his acute interest in the most vital socio - political problems of the day.»
I
think what I would do with «Pedro» here is what I recently started doing with some others who love to revisit the same
questions over and
over again, as if they were either drunk or suffering from memory loss.
If we now find ourselves obliged to raise precisely this
question once again and to
think it
over afresh, we must first of all make it clear that we are here taking the concept of good in its widest sense, that is to say, simply as the contrary of vicious, lawless and scandalous, as the opposite of public transgression of the moral law, as good in contrast to the publican and harlot.
I don't
think I would put them to the average layperson in a small group setting, but to a pastor or deacon, a
question or two at a time... for the record, I am a high school grad, have had three jobs in my entire life (church custodian, newspaper pasteup [pre-computer pagination], and grocery deli clerk), am on SSDI for complications of Marfan's Syndrome, and a Medicare beneficiary, no secondary insurance because I am about $ 20
over the income limit for Medicaid.
But the recognition that human
thought can not attain any certain knowledge can liberate one to
think freely and creatively
over a wide range of
questions that have often been taboo when one was supposed to limit
thinking to areas in which certainty is possible.
I'm not gonna beat you
over the head with scriptures from various faiths, though I
think a good read of Huston Smith's THE RELIGIONS OF MAN would be a healthy read for a
questioning mind.
The
question that Christians (or other religious people) should ask themselves here is philosophical rather than sociological: Granting (as I
think we must) that modern science has given us new and often penetrating insights into reality and that modern technology has enormously increased our control
over our lives, is it not possible that in the process some very precious things have been lost?
As Yahweh overpassed early limitations in the
thinking of his people until he was recognized as God of heaven and earth, the
question of his power
over the realm below the earth was inevitably raised, and the forces which had expanded his sway elsewhere tended to include also under his domain the abode of the rephaim.
She explained: «I
think there is a massive
question over the whole idea of encouraging younger and younger children to spend more and more time glued to screens.»
If a denomination turned to a specific faculty with a specific
question, requesting guidance in
thinking about it, that faculty could organize itself in such a way that students and teachers could work together
over a period of years to come up with ideas that would often be genuinely helpful.
It isn't possible for me to go into these stories in any detail in such a short time, so I
thought, instead of doing that, I would like to devote my time this morning to addressing some of the main
questions people have asked me repeatedly
over the course of the last two years, when I was working on the book, and after the book had come out.
Genevieve this is my story i hope it may help you but your
question was one i struggled
over for years i couldnt let go of my past sins they were on a continous loop playing in my mind that nearly drove me
over the edge.I knew that Christ had forgiven me but i couldnt forgive myself maybe i
thought that i deserved to be punished.What set me free from this trap?