Thus by their very nature, hybrid blended - learning models cost teachers more time than they save.
Not exact matches
Many — if not most — studies — such as literature, philosophy, history, religion, geography, and anthropology (to name only some of them)--
by their
very nature draw upon a variety of other fields of study and
thus are particularly suited to general education, provided they are not ruined for that purpose
by professional zeal to make them into precise, technical, exclusive disciplines — as occurs even in such a naturally general field as literature, when its promoters restrict it to technical textual analysis.
«Divine inspiration» means «produced
by God», and this means, in terms of our discussion of God in Chapter VIII, «arising from those aspects of the
nature of things which are experienced in the five fundamentals of change, dependence, etc.»
Thus divine inspiration can be intelligibly interpreted to mean that the Scriptures are
very particularly transparent to and vehicles of the basic experiences called religious.
Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level,
thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit,
by it's
very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.
Thus «faith», the pattern of contemporary religious experience which is to relate us to God through Christ, can not
by its
very nature be built upon «the present evil aeon», with all that it provides of worldly security under man's control and invariably at his disposal;
by definition «faith» is the life given in death, and consequently has its basis beyond our control, is lived out of the future, is «an act of faith».
Thus Beauty is left as the one aim which
by its
very»
nature is self - justifying.
Arsenal players
by nature, like most technical players avoid contact
thus not
very good competing in aerial battles.
This effect turns out to be relatively small because it is proportional in
nature, and
thus results in a
very small absolute increase when growth is suppressed i the first place
by limited growing seasons.
This is caused
by the
nature of the new «shale» reservoirs, which have extremely low permeability, and
thus tend to produce in commercial quantities if the «petroleum» has
very low viscosity.
Moreover the recent decline of the yearly increments d (CO2) / dt acknowledged
by Francey et al (2013)(figure 17 - F) and even
by James Hansen who say that the Chinese coal emissions have been immensely beneficial to the plants that are now bigger grow faster and eat more CO2 due to the fertilisation of the air (references in note 19) cast some doubts on those compartment models with many adjustable parameters, models proved to be blatantly wrong
by observations as said
very politely
by Wang et al.: (Xuhui Wang et al: A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations,
Nature, 2014) «
Thus, the problems present models have in reproducing the observed response of the carbon cycle to climate variability on interannual timescales may call into question their ability to predict the future evolution of the carbon cycle and its feedbacks to climate»
You are subjects dealing with subjective writings,
thus the only possible outcome will be subjective
by it's
very nature at both ends (written texts and data reduction are clearly both subjective efforts).
Further, as stated many times
by others, CO2 sensitivity is log,
thus, we will have to reach 1000 ppm to increase the temp
by 2C, and even there, the probability of the actual temp metric reaching that point is, IMO,
very low, because
nature does have feedbacks.
The ruling confirms that there is no mens rea (intent) bundled within the offence of «super speeding»
thus such an offence,
by its
very nature, can not be punished
by criminal sanctions such as jail (which IS indeed a possible sentence for stunt driving).
The Lambs, who should be the collective fighters,
by dint of their majority status numbers, but who
by their
very collective newbie
nature are pacifists, who
thus are not fighters, but who would collectively benefit the most from real political efficiencies at the CREAcrat level, remain dutifully silent.