In this sweeping town hall meeting moderated by New York
Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin, pioneering scientists presented research at the vanguard of solar, wind, geothermal and algae / biofuel energy, while conservationists and high - level policy - makers provided additional perspectives on the challenges and opportunities presented by this urgent global problem.
Here's an astonishing segment from a recent interview with futurist Vaclav Smil, conducted by New York
Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin.
Excerpt: New York
Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin publicly chastised NASA warming scientist James Hansen for promoting sea level claims that are at the upper boundary of what is «even physically possible.»
Yesterday, I discussed the latest essay on climate science and politics from New York
Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin (along wirth Joe Romm's critique).
First, there was another confused piece on climate change from New York
Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin, this time postulating that «stable temperatures» and «a recent spate of relatively cool years» might blunt momentum for an international agreement on curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
After the interview, it fell to
Times environmental reporter Coral Davenport to point out that the Supreme Court had already granted authority to the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases.
Awarded a major grant to conduct an exhaustive study of the deteriorating environment of the Arctic by the Pew Charitable Trusts (the first time Pew has given such a grant to a journalist), Los Angeles
Times environmental reporter Marla Cone traveled across the Arctic, from Greenland to the Aleutian Islands, to find out why the Arctic is toxic.
Not exact matches
In recent years
reporters have chronicled the «repentant stance» that characterizes such gatherings of men as Promise Keepers, as participants openly regret their acts or omissions as husbands, fathers, brothers and sons.24 At
times, however, a failure to respond to
environmental damage mirrors omissions on the home front.
That landmark statement, and the dawn of the global warming discussion, was covered by Andy Revkin, then a DISCOVER senior editor and now an
environmental reporter for The New York
Times.
Given the pre-Thanksgiving rollout of EPA's new ozone standards, several
environmental reporters joked that the agency's midsummer
time frame will lead to rules being proposed on Friday, July 3 (Greenwire, Nov. 26, 2014).
Indeed, as an environment
reporter who travels frequently in Europe, I find that one of the obvious paradoxes of global
environmental statistics is how American per capita emissions are two to three
times that of Sweden or France, although Americans» quality of life is certainly not two to three
times better than that of a Swede or a Frenchman.
Yes, many people repeat Gelbspan's line about
reporters giving unfair media balance to crooked skeptic scientists, but it doesn't take much additional digging to see where a Senior Producer at Turner Broadcasting, Teya Ryan, made her case in 1990 with a lengthy opinion in the Society of
Environmental Journalists Winter 1990 - 91 newsletter about media balance being «artificial, a matter of giving equal air
time or newshole space to dissenting views of questionable merit.
Environmental reporters for The New York
Times and The Washington Post covered the story, inevitably dubbed «climategate,» giving IPCC scientists a chance to explain the e-mail exchanges.
As Andrew Revkin wrote last year about his storied career as an
environmental reporter at The
Times, «I saw a widening gap between what scientists had been learning about global warming and what advocates were claiming as they pushed ever harder to pass climate legislation.»
In the United States, a critical role has been played by among others by
environmental reporter Andrew Revkin, who at a critical point turned over his blog at the New York
Times to largely serve as a forum for doubt and contrarianism about basic climate science.
While it's perhaps unfair to compare Eilperin's work to that of the
Times» entire environment desk, it's hard to argue that there's a more influential national
reporter on
environmental issues.
Bill Keller, the
Times» former executive editor, created the
environmental desk in 2009 and hired Erica Goode, now a national desk
reporter covering criminal justice, as its editor.
Andrew Revkin, the normally perceptive New York
Times environmental science
reporter, appeared to assert that Dyson's views were worth considering, and implied that Dyson had too much integrity to lend his name to tawdry anti-AGW PR campaigns:
SEJ member,
reporter and author Andrew Revkin is the senior fellow for
environmental understanding at Pace University's Academy for Applied Environmental Studies and writes the award - winning Dot Earth blog for the Op - Ed side of The Ne
environmental understanding at Pace University's Academy for Applied
Environmental Studies and writes the award - winning Dot Earth blog for the Op - Ed side of The Ne
Environmental Studies and writes the award - winning Dot Earth blog for the Op - Ed side of The New York
Times.
Andy has been one of the U.S.'s top
environmental reporters over the past few decades, including a 15 - year stint at the New York
Times.